Non-small cell lung cancer

From HemOnc.org - A Hematology Oncology Wiki
Revision as of 04:29, 12 May 2017 by PeterYang (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Use of this site is subject to you reading and agreeing with the terms set forth in the disclaimer.

Is there a regimen missing from this list? Would you like to share a different dosage/schedule or an additional reference for a regimen? Have you noticed an error? Do you have an idea that will help the site grow to better meet your needs and the needs of many others? You are invited to contribute to the site.

115 regimens on this page
229 variants on this page


Guidelines

ASCO

ESMO

IASLC

NCCN

Adjuvant therapy

Carboplatin & Paclitaxel

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Strauss et al. 2008 (CALGB 9633) Phase III Observation Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

References

  1. Strauss GM, Herndon JE 2nd, Maddaus MA, Johnstone DW, Johnson EA, Harpole DH, Gillenwater HH, Watson DM, Sugarbaker DJ, Schilsky RL, Vokes EE, Green MR. Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study Groups. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 1;26(31):5043-51. Epub 2008 Sep 22. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Docetaxel

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Barlesi et al. 2015 Phase III Cisplatin & Gemcitabine Seems not superior

Treatment begins within 8 weeks of complete R0 resection for Stage IB–III NSCLC.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 3 cycles

References

  1. Barlesi F, Chouaid C, Crequit J, Le Caer H, Pujol JL, Legodec J, Vergnenegre A, Le Treut J, Fabre-Guillevin E, Loundou A, Auquier P, Simeoni MC, Thomas PA. A randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin with docetaxel plus cisplatin in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer with quality of life as the primary objective. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):783-90. Epub 2015 Mar 11. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Etoposide

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Arriagada et al. 2004 Phase III Observation Seems to have superior OS

Chemotherapy

28-day cycle for 4 cycles

References

  1. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Vansteenkiste J; International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 22;350(4):351-60. link to original article PubMed

Cisplatin & Gemcitabine

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Barlesi et al. 2015 Phase III Cisplatin & Docetaxel Seems not superior

Treatment begins within 8 weeks of complete R0 resection for Stage IB–III NSCLC.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 3 cycles

References

  1. Barlesi F, Chouaid C, Crequit J, Le Caer H, Pujol JL, Legodec J, Vergnenegre A, Le Treut J, Fabre-Guillevin E, Loundou A, Auquier P, Simeoni MC, Thomas PA. A randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin with docetaxel plus cisplatin in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer with quality of life as the primary objective. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):783-90. Epub 2015 Mar 11. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Pemetrexed

back to top

CPx: Cisplatin & Pemetrexed

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Kreuter et al. 2013 (TREAT) Randomized Phase II Cisplatin & Vinorelbine Seems not superior (*)

Treatment to begin within 4 to 6 weeks after complete resection of pathologically confirmed NSCLC stages (according to the TNM staging system version 6) IB, IIA, IIB or T3N1. *Efficacy based on updated results.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

References

  1. Kreuter M, Vansteenkiste J, Fischer JR, Eberhardt W, Zabeck H, Kollmeier J, Serke M, Frickhofen N, Reck M, Engel-Riedel W, Neumann S, Thomeer M, Schumann C, De Leyn P, Graeter T, Stamatis G, Zuna I, Griesinger F, Thomas M; TREAT investigators. Randomized phase 2 trial on refinement of early-stage NSCLC adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed versus cisplatin and vinorelbine: the TREAT study. Ann Oncol. 2013 Apr;24(4):986-92. Epub 2012 Nov 15. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Kreuter M, Vansteenkiste J, Fischer JR, Eberhardt WE, Zabeck H, Kollmeier J, Serke M, Frickhofen N, Reck M, Engel-Riedel W, Neumann S, Thomeer M, Schumann C, De Leyn P, Graeter T, Stamatis G, Griesinger F, Thomas M; TREAT investigators. Three-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Phase II Trial on Refinement of Early-Stage NSCLC Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and Pemetrexed versus Cisplatin and Vinorelbine (the TREAT Study). J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jan;11(1):85-93. link to original article PubMed

Cisplatin & Vinblastine

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Arriagada et al. 2004 Phase III Observation Seems to have superior OS

Note: Exact days for parts of the regimen were not specified by Arriagada et al. 2004. This vinblastine schedule is extrapolated from regimen information in Table 1 in which vinblastine is said to be given "weekly from days 1 to 29" and "then every 2 weeks after day 43 until last cisplatin administration.

Chemotherapy

12-week course

References

  1. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Vansteenkiste J; International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 22;350(4):351-60. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Vindesine

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Arriagada et al. 2004 Phase III Observation Seems to have superior OS

Note: Exact days for parts of the regimen were not specified by Arriagada et al. 2004. This vindesine schedule is extrapolated from regimen information in Table 1 in which vindesine is said to be given "weekly from days 1 to 29" and "then every 2 weeks after day 43 until last cisplatin administration.

Chemotherapy

12-week course

References

  1. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Vansteenkiste J; International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 22;350(4):351-60. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Vinorelbine

back to top

CVb: Cisplatin & Vinorelbine

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Winton et al. 2005 (JBR.10) Phase III Observation Seems to have superior OS
Kreuter et al. 2013 (TREAT) Randomized Phase II Cisplatin & Pemetrexed Seems not superior (*)

Treatment in TREAT to begin within 4 to 6 weeks after complete resection of pathologically confirmed NSCLC stages (according to the TNM staging system version 6) IB, IIA, IIB or T3N1. *TREAT Efficacy based on updated results.

Chemotherapy

28-day cycle for 4 cycles

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Arriagada et al. 2004 Phase III Observation Seems to have superior OS
Douillard et al. 2006 (ANITA) Phase III Observation Seems to have superior OS

Chemotherapy

28-day cycle for 4 cycles

Regimen #3

Study Evidence
Hotta et al. 2001 Phase II

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

References

  1. Hotta K, Sekine I, Tamura T, Sawada M, Watanabe H, Kusaba H, Akiyama Y, Inoue A, Shimoyama T, Nokihara H, Ueda Y, Yamamoto N, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Kodama T, Saijo N. A phase I/II study of cisplatin and vinorelbine chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001 Dec;31(12):596-600. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Vansteenkiste J; International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 22;350(4):351-60. link to original article PubMed content property of HemOnc.org
  3. Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D, Rigas J, Johnston M, Butts C, Cormier Y, Goss G, Inculet R, Vallieres E, Fry W, Bethune D, Ayoub J, Ding K, Seymour L, Graham B, Tsao MS, Gandara D, Kesler K, Demmy T, Shepherd F; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group; National Cancer Institute of the United States Intergroup JBR.10 Trial Investigators. Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 23;352(25):2589-97. link to original article PubMed
  4. Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M, Carpagnano F, Ramlau R, Gonzáles-Larriba JL, Grodzki T, Pereira JR, Le Groumellec A, Lorusso V, Clary C, Torres AJ, Dahabreh J, Souquet PJ, Astudillo J, Fournel P, Artal-Cortes A, Jassem J, Koubkova L, His P, Riggi M, Hurteloup P. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Sep;7(9):719-27. link to original article PubMed
  5. Kreuter M, Vansteenkiste J, Fischer JR, Eberhardt W, Zabeck H, Kollmeier J, Serke M, Frickhofen N, Reck M, Engel-Riedel W, Neumann S, Thomeer M, Schumann C, De Leyn P, Graeter T, Stamatis G, Zuna I, Griesinger F, Thomas M; TREAT investigators. Randomized phase 2 trial on refinement of early-stage NSCLC adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed versus cisplatin and vinorelbine: the TREAT study. Ann Oncol. 2013 Apr;24(4):986-92. Epub 2012 Nov 15. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Kreuter M, Vansteenkiste J, Fischer JR, Eberhardt WE, Zabeck H, Kollmeier J, Serke M, Frickhofen N, Reck M, Engel-Riedel W, Neumann S, Thomeer M, Schumann C, De Leyn P, Graeter T, Stamatis G, Griesinger F, Thomas M; TREAT investigators. Three-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Phase II Trial on Refinement of Early-Stage NSCLC Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and Pemetrexed versus Cisplatin and Vinorelbine (the TREAT Study). J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jan;11(1):85-93. link to original article PubMed

Placebo (Observation)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Arriagada et al. 2004 Phase III Cisplatin & Etoposide Seems to have inferior OS
Cisplatin & Vinblastine Seems to have inferior OS
Cisplatin & Vindesine Seems to have inferior OS
Cisplatin & Vinorelbine Seems to have inferior OS
Winton et al. 2006 (JBR.10) Phase III Cisplatin & Vinorelbine Seems to have inferior OS
Douillard et al. 2006 (ANITA) Phase III Cisplatin & Vinorelbine Seems to have inferior OS
Strauss et al. 2008 (CALGB 9633) Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Seems not superior

No treatment. Placed here because one or more randomized clinical trials included a placebo or observation arm in this disease context.

References

  1. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Vansteenkiste J; International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 22;350(4):351-60. link to original article PubMed
  2. Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D, Rigas J, Johnston M, Butts C, Cormier Y, Goss G, Inculet R, Vallieres E, Fry W, Bethune D, Ayoub J, Ding K, Seymour L, Graham B, Tsao MS, Gandara D, Kesler K, Demmy T, Shepherd F; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group; National Cancer Institute of the United States Intergroup JBR.10 Trial Investigators. Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 23;352(25):2589-97. link to original article PubMed
  3. Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M, Carpagnano F, Ramlau R, Gonzáles-Larriba JL, Grodzki T, Pereira JR, Le Groumellec A, Lorusso V, Clary C, Torres AJ, Dahabreh J, Souquet PJ, Astudillo J, Fournel P, Artal-Cortes A, Jassem J, Koubkova L, His P, Riggi M, Hurteloup P. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Sep;7(9):719-27. link to original article PubMed
  4. Strauss GM, Herndon JE 2nd, Maddaus MA, Johnstone DW, Johnson EA, Harpole DH, Gillenwater HH, Watson DM, Sugarbaker DJ, Schilsky RL, Vokes EE, Green MR. Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study Groups. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 1;26(31):5043-51. Epub 2008 Sep 22. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Chemotherapy & radiation therapy

Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, concurrent RT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Belani et al. 2005 Phase II

Note: This regimen is listed by the NCCN, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer version 2.2012, but this differs from the Belani et al. 2005 reference, in which additional consolidation chemotherapy is given after completion of concurrent chemotherapy & radiation therapy. That regimen is detailed here.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 2 cycles, given with concurrent radiation therapy

Concurrent radiation therapy

  • Concurrent radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy fractions x 25 fractions (total dose: 45 Gy), given once per day 5 days per week, then 2 Gy fractions x 9 fractions (additional dose: 18 Gy), given once per day 5 days per week. Total dose: 63 Gy over a total 7 week course of treatment.

References

  1. Belani CP, Choy H, Bonomi P, Scott C, Travis P, Haluschak J, Curran WJ Jr. Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):5883-91. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, concurrent RT -> consolidation chemo

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Belani et al. 2005 Phase II

Chemoradiotherapy

21-day cycle for 2 cycles, given with concurrent radiation therapy

Concurrent radiation therapy

  • Concurrent radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy fractions x 25 fractions (total dose: 45 Gy), given once per day 5 days per week, then 2 Gy fractions x 9 fractions (additional dose: 18 Gy), given once per day 5 days per week. Total dose: 63 Gy over a total 7 week course of treatment.

Consolidation chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 2 cycles

References

  1. Belani CP, Choy H, Bonomi P, Scott C, Travis P, Haluschak J, Curran WJ Jr. Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):5883-91. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Carboplatin, Paclitaxel -> sequential RT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Belani et al. 2005 Phase II

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 2 cycles, then proceed to radiation therapy

Radiation therapy

  • Sequential radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy fractions x 25 fractions (total dose: 45 Gy), given once per day 5 days per week, then 2 Gy fractions x 9 fractions (additional dose: 18 Gy), given once per day 5 days per week. Total dose: 63 Gy over a total 7 week course of treatment.

References

  1. Belani CP, Choy H, Bonomi P, Scott C, Travis P, Haluschak J, Curran WJ Jr. Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):5883-91. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Cisplatin, Etoposide, concurrent RT

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Curran et al. 2011 (RTOG 9410) Phase III Cisplatin, Vinblastine, concurrent RT Seems not superior
Cisplatin, Vinblastine, sequential RT Might have superior OS

Chemoradiotherapy

  • Cisplatin (Platinol) 50 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1, 8, 29, 36
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 50 mg PO BID on days 1 to 5, 8 to 12, 29 to 33, 36 to 40
  • Concurrent radiation therapy, 1.2 Gy fractions (total dose: 69.6 Gy), given twice per day for 5 days per week, starting on day 1

5-week course

Regimen #2

Study Evidence
Albain et al. 2002 (SWOG 9019) Phase II

Chemoradiotherapy

  • Cisplatin (Platinol) 50 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1, 8, 29, 36
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 50 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5, 29 to 33
  • Concurrent radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy fractions x 25 fractions (total dose: 45 Gy), given 5 days per week, to start within 24 hours of chemotherapy

5-week initial course of chemoradiotherapy

Patients were reimaged with CT scan (bone scan and head imaging were only done if patients had new symptoms), and those without progression or new metastatic disease received an additional 2 Gy per day x 8 fractions for a total of 61 Gy administered overall.

References

  1. Albain KS, Crowley JJ, Turrisi AT 3rd, Gandara DR, Farrar WB, Clark JI, Beasley KR, Livingston RB. Concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, and chest radiotherapy in pathologic stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II study, SWOG 9019. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Aug 15;20(16):3454-60. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Curran WJ Jr, Paulus R, Langer CJ, Komaki R, Lee JS, Hauser S, Movsas B, Wasserman T, Rosenthal SA, Gore E, Machtay M, Sause W, Cox JD. Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 5;103(19):1452-60. Epub 2011 Sep 8. Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(1):79. link to original article PubMed

Cisplatin, Etoposide, concurrent RT -> consolidation chemo

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Albain et al. 2002 (SWOG 9019) Phase II

Note: The NCCN, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer version 2.2012, describes "two extra cycles" of chemotherapy being given after completion of concurrent RT, but no primary reference can be found for this. It is unclear what the length of each cycle is supposed to be.

Chemoradiotherapy

  • Cisplatin (Platinol) 50 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1, 8, 29, 36
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 50 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5, 29 to 33
  • Concurrent radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy fractions x 25 fractions (total dose: 45 Gy), given 5 days per week, to start within 24 hours of chemotherapy

5-week initial course of chemotherapy & radiation; patients were reimaged with CT scan (bone scan and head imaging were only done if patients had new symptoms), and those without progression or new metastatic disease received an additional 2 Gy per day x 8 fractions for a total of 61 Gy administered overall

Consolidation chemotherapy

28-day cycle for 2 cycles

References

  1. Albain KS, Crowley JJ, Turrisi AT 3rd, Gandara DR, Farrar WB, Clark JI, Beasley KR, Livingston RB. Concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, and chest radiotherapy in pathologic stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II study, SWOG 9019. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Aug 15;20(16):3454-60. link to original article contains protocol--see note above PubMed

Cisplatin, Vinblastine, concurrent RT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Curran et al. 2011 (RTOG 9410) Phase III Cisplatin, Etoposide, concurrent RT Seems not superior
Cisplatin, Vinblastine, sequential RT Seems to have superior OS

Chemoradiotherapy

5-week course of chemotherapy

References

  1. Curran WJ Jr, Paulus R, Langer CJ, Komaki R, Lee JS, Hauser S, Movsas B, Wasserman T, Rosenthal SA, Gore E, Machtay M, Sause W, Cox JD. Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 5;103(19):1452-60. Epub 2011 Sep 8. Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(1):79. link to original article PubMed

Cisplatin, Vinblastine, sequential RT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Curran et al. 2011 (RTOG 9410) Phase III Cisplatin, Etoposide, concurrent RT Might have inferior OS
Cisplatin, Vinblastine, concurrent RT Seems to have inferior OS

Chemotherapy

5-week total course of chemotherapy

  • Radiation therapy given after chemotherapy is complete

References

  1. Curran WJ Jr, Paulus R, Langer CJ, Komaki R, Lee JS, Hauser S, Movsas B, Wasserman T, Rosenthal SA, Gore E, Machtay M, Sause W, Cox JD. Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 5;103(19):1452-60. Epub 2011 Sep 8. Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(1):79. link to original article PubMed

Advanced or metastatic disease, ALK-positive

Alectinib (Alecensa)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Ou et al. 2015 (NP28673) Phase II
Gandhi et al. 2015 (NP28761) Phase II

Patients in NP28673 and NP28761 were ALK mutation positive and had progression of disease on Crizotinib (Xalkori).

Chemotherapy

Given until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent

References

  1. Leena Gandhi, Alice Shaw, Shirish M. Gadgeel, Gregory Riely, Jeremy Cetnar, Howard Jack West, D. Ross Camidge, Mark A. Socinski, Alberto Chiappori, Tarek Mekhail, Bo H. Chao, Hossein Borghaei, Kathryn A. Gold, Ali Hassan Zeaiter, Walter Bordogna, Bogdana Balas, Oscar Puig, Volkmar Henschel, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, NP28761 Study Investigators. A phase II, open-label, multicenter study of the ALK inhibitor alectinib in an ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) U.S./Canadian population who had progressed on crizotinib (NP28761). 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting abstract 8019. link to abstract
  2. Ou SI, Ahn JS, De Petris L, Govindan R, Yang JC, Hughes B, Lena H, Moro-Sibilot D, Bearz A, Ramirez SV, Mekhail T, Spira A, Bordogna W, Balas B, Morcos PN, Monnet A, Zeaiter A, Kim DW. Alectinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Global Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 23. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Brigatinib (Alunbrig)

Brigatinib (Alunbrig) for advanced or metastatic ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Ceritinib (Zykadia)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Soria et al. 2017 (ASCEND-4) Phase III Carboplatin & Pemetrexed
Cisplatin & Pemetrexed
Superior PFS

Chemotherapy

Given until progression of disease

References

  1. Phase I: Shaw AT, Kim DW, Mehra R, Tan DS, Felip E, Chow LQ, Camidge DR, Vansteenkiste J, Sharma S, De Pas T, Riely GJ, Solomon BJ, Wolf J, Thomas M, Schuler M, Liu G, Santoro A, Lau YY, Goldwasser M, Boral AL, Engelman JA. Ceritinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 27;370(13):1189-97. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Soria JC, Tan DS, Chiari R, Wu YL, Paz-Ares L, Wolf J, Geater SL, Orlov S, Cortinovis D, Yu CJ, Hochmair M, Cortot AB, Tsai CM, Moro-Sibilot D, Campelo RG, McCulloch T, Sen P, Dugan M, Pantano S, Branle F, Massacesi C, de Castro G Jr. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):917-929. Epub 2017 Jan 24. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Crizotinib (Xalkori)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Kwak et al. 2010 Phase II
Shaw et al. 2013 Phase III Pemetrexed Superior PFS
Docetaxel Superior PFS

Chemotherapy

28-day cycles, given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

Shaw et al. 2013 used 21-day cycles, and crizotinib was similarly given 250 mg PO BID on all days.

References

  1. Kwak EL, Bang YJ, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Solomon B, Maki RG, Ou SH, Dezube BJ, Jänne PA, Costa DB, Varella-Garcia M, Kim WH, Lynch TJ, Fidias P, Stubbs H, Engelman JA, Sequist LV, Tan W, Gandhi L, Mino-Kenudson M, Wei GC, Shreeve SM, Ratain MJ, Settleman J, Christensen JG, Haber DA, Wilner K, Salgia R, Shapiro GI, Clark JW, Iafrate AJ. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 28;363(18):1693-703. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Camidge DR, Bang YJ, Kwak EL, Iafrate AJ, Varella-Garcia M, Fox SB, Riely GJ, Solomon B, Ou SH, Kim DW, Salgia R, Fidias P, Engelman JA, Gandhi L, Jänne PA, Costa DB, Shapiro GI, Lorusso P, Ruffner K, Stephenson P, Tang Y, Wilner K, Clark JW, Shaw AT. Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Oct;13(10):1011-9. Epub 2012 Sep 4. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Retrospective: Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Solomon BJ, Riely GJ, Gainor J, Engelman JA, Shapiro GI, Costa DB, Ou SH, Butaney M, Salgia R, Maki RG, Varella-Garcia M, Doebele RC, Bang YJ, Kulig K, Selaru P, Tang Y, Wilner KD, Kwak EL, Clark JW, Iafrate AJ, Camidge DR. Effect of crizotinib on overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring ALK gene rearrangement: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):1004-12. Epub 2011 Sep 18. link to original article PubMed
  3. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K, Seto T, Crinó L, Ahn MJ, De Pas T, Besse B, Solomon BJ, Blackhall F, Wu YL, Thomas M, O'Byrne KJ, Moro-Sibilot D, Camidge DR, Mok T, Hirsh V, Riely GJ, Iyer S, Tassell V, Polli A, Wilner KD, Jänne PA. Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20;368(25):2385-94. Epub 2013 Jun 1. link to original article link to supplementary appendix contains verified protocol PubMed

Advanced or metastatic disease

Afatinib (Gliotrif)

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Yang et al. 2012 (LUX-Lung 2) Phase II
Sequist et al. 2013 (LUX-Lung 3) Phase III Cisplatin & Pemetrexed Superior PFS
Wu et al. 2014 (LUX-Lung 6) Phase III Cisplatin & Gemcitabine Superior PFS
Soria et al. 2015 (LUX-Lung 8) Phase III Erlotinib Superior OS
Park et al. 2016 (LUX-Lung 7) Randomized Phase II Gefitinib Seems to have superior PFS

Chemotherapy

  • Afatinib (Gliotrif) 40 mg PO once per day, given 1 hour before eating food (Yang et al. 2012: "no food intake immediately before or after afatinib")
    • In LUX-Lung 3, patients could be increased to 50 mg PO once per day if they did not experience any grade 2 or higher rash, diarrhea, mucositis, or other drug-related adverse event.

Given until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Miller et al. 2012 (LUX-Lung 1) Phase III Placebo Superior PFS
Katakami et al. 2013 (LUX-Lung 4) Phase II

In LUX-Lung 4, 72.6% of patients were EGFR mutation positive. This was third or fourth line therapy for participants, who had progressed while receiving erlotinib and/or gefitinib and had received one or two previous lines of chemotherapy, including at least one platinum-based regimen.

Chemotherapy

Given until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent

References

  1. Miller VA, Hirsh V, Cadranel J, Chen YM, Park K, Kim SW, Zhou C, Su WC, Wang M, Sun Y, Heo DS, Crino L, Tan EH, Chao TY, Shahidi M, Cong XJ, Lorence RM, Yang JC. Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):528-38. Epub 2012 Mar 26. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Yang JC, Shih JY, Su WC, Hsia TC, Tsai CM, Ou SH, Yu CJ, Chang GC, Ho CL, Sequist LV, Dudek AZ, Shahidi M, Cong XJ, Lorence RM, Yang PC, Miller VA. Afatinib for patients with lung adenocarcinoma and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (LUX-Lung 2): a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):539-48. Epub 2012 Mar 26. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, O'Byrne K, Hirsh V, Mok T, Geater SL, Orlov S, Tsai CM, Boyer M, Su WC, Bennouna J, Kato T, Gorbunova V, Lee KH, Shah R, Massey D, Zazulina V, Shahidi M, Schuler M. Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3327-34. Epub 2013 Jul 1. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Subgroup analysis: Yang JC, Hirsh V, Schuler M, Yamamoto N, O'Byrne KJ, Mok TS, Zazulina V, Shahidi M, Lungershausen J, Massey D, Palmer M, Sequist LV. Symptom Control and Quality of Life in LUX-Lung 3: A Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin/Pemetrexed in Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3342-50. Epub 2013 Jul 1. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    2. Update: Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, Sebastian M, Popat S, Yamamoto N, Zhou C, Hu CP, O'Byrne K, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Geater SL, Lee KY, Tsai CM, Gorbunova V, Hirsh V, Bennouna J, Orlov S, Mok T, Boyer M, Su WC, Lee KH, Kato T, Massey D, Shahidi M, Zazulina V, Sequist LV. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51. link to SD article PubMed
    3. Subgroup analysis: Schuler M, Wu YL, Hirsh V, O'Byrne K, Yamamoto N, Mok T, Popat S, Sequist LV, Massey D, Zazulina V, Yang JC. First-Line Afatinib versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Common Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations and Brain Metastases. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Mar;11(3):380-90. link to SD article PubMed
  4. Katakami N, Atagi S, Goto K, Hida T, Horai T, Inoue A, Ichinose Y, Koboyashi K, Takeda K, Kiura K, Nishio K, Seki Y, Ebisawa R, Shahidi M, Yamamoto N. LUX-Lung 4: A Phase II Trial of Afatinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Progressed During Prior Treatment With Erlotinib, Gefitinib, or Both. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3335-41. Epub 2013 Jul 1. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  5. Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Li W, Hou M, Shi JH, Lee KY, Xu CR, Massey D, Kim M, Shi Y, Geater SL. Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):213-22. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, Sebastian M, Popat S, Yamamoto N, Zhou C, Hu CP, O'Byrne K, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Geater SL, Lee KY, Tsai CM, Gorbunova V, Hirsh V, Bennouna J, Orlov S, Mok T, Boyer M, Su WC, Lee KH, Kato T, Massey D, Shahidi M, Zazulina V, Sequist LV. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51. link to SD article PubMed
    2. Subgroup analysis: Schuler M, Wu YL, Hirsh V, O'Byrne K, Yamamoto N, Mok T, Popat S, Sequist LV, Massey D, Zazulina V, Yang JC. First-Line Afatinib versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Common Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations and Brain Metastases. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Mar;11(3):380-90. link to SD article PubMed
  6. Soria JC, Felip E, Cobo M, Lu S, Syrigos K, Lee KH, Göker E, Georgoulias V, Li W, Isla D, Guclu SZ, Morabito A, Min YJ, Ardizzoni A, Gadgeel SM, Wang B, Chand VK, Goss GD; LUX-Lung 8 Investigators. Afatinib versus erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUX-Lung 8): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):897-907. Epub 2015 Jul 5. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  7. Park K, Tan EH, O'Byrne K, Zhang L, Boyer M, Mok T, Hirsh V, Yang JC, Lee KH, Lu S, Shi Y, Kim SW, Laskin J, Kim DW, Arvis CD, Kölbeck K, Laurie SA, Tsai CM, Shahidi M, Kim M, Massey D, Zazulina V, Paz-Ares L. Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): a phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):577-89. Epub 2016 Apr 12. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Atezolizumab (Tecentriq)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Fehrenbacher et al. 2016 (POPLAR) Randomized Phase II Docetaxel Seems to have superior OS
Rittmeyer et al. 2017 (OAK) Phase III Docetaxel Superior OS

Immunotherapy

3-week cycles

References

  1. Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, Vansteenkiste J, Mazieres J, Park K, Smith D, Artal-Cortes A, Lewanski C, Braiteh F, Waterkamp D, He P, Zou W, Chen DS, Yi J, Sandler A, Rittmeyer A; POPLAR Study Group. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46. Epub 2016 Mar 9. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J, Gadgeel SM, Hida T, Kowalski DM, Dols MC, Cortinovis DL, Leach J, Polikoff J, Barrios C, Kabbinavar F, Frontera OA, De Marinis F, Turna H, Lee JS, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, He P, Chen DS, Sandler A, Gandara DR; OAK Study Group.. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Jan 21;389(10066):255-265. link to origial article PubMed

Cabozantinib (Cometriq)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Neal et al. 2016 (ECOG-ACRIN 1512) Randomized Phase II Cabozantinib & Erlotinib Not reported
Erlotinib Superior PFS

Chemotherapy

Continued until progression or intolerance

References

  1. Neal JW, Dahlberg SE, Wakelee HA, Aisner SC, Bowden M, Huang Y, Carbone DP, Gerstner GJ, Lerner RE, Rubin JL, Owonikoko TK, Stella PJ, Steen PD, Khalid AA, Ramalingam SS; ECOG-ACRIN 1512 Investigators.. Erlotinib, cabozantinib, or erlotinib plus cabozantinib as second-line or third-line treatment of patients with EGFR wild-type advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ECOG-ACRIN 1512): a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov 4. [Epub ahead of print] link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Cabozantinib & Erlotinib

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Neal et al. 2016 (ECOG-ACRIN 1512) Randomized Phase II Cabozantinib Not reported
Erlotinib Superior PFS

Chemotherapy

Continued until progression or intolerance

References

  1. Neal JW, Dahlberg SE, Wakelee HA, Aisner SC, Bowden M, Huang Y, Carbone DP, Gerstner GJ, Lerner RE, Rubin JL, Owonikoko TK, Stella PJ, Steen PD, Khalid AA, Ramalingam SS; ECOG-ACRIN 1512 Investigators.. Erlotinib, cabozantinib, or erlotinib plus cabozantinib as second-line or third-line treatment of patients with EGFR wild-type advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ECOG-ACRIN 1512): a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov 4. [Epub ahead of print] link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Carboplatin & Docetaxel

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Fossella et al. 2003 (TAX 326) Phase III Cisplatin & Docetaxel Not reported
Cisplatin & Vinorelbine Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. Fossella F, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Pluzanska A, Gorbounova V, Kaukel E, Mattson KV, Ramlau R, Szczesna A, Fidias P, Millward M, Belani CP. Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TAX 326 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3016-24. Epub 2003 Jul 1. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Carboplatin & Gemcitabine

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Sederholm et al. 2005 Phase III Gemcitabine Seems to have superior OS
Grønberg et al. 2009 Phase III Carboplatin & Pemetrexed Seems not superior
Zhou et al. 2011 (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802) Phase III Erlotinib Inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. Sederholm C, Hillerdal G, Lamberg K, Kölbeck K, Dufmats M, Westberg R, Gawande SR. Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: the Swedish Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8380-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Grønberg BH, Bremnes RM, Fløtten O, Amundsen T, Brunsvig PF, Hjelde HH, Kaasa S, von Plessen C, Stornes F, Tollåli T, Wammer F, Aasebø U, Sundstrøm S. Phase III study by the Norwegian lung cancer study group: pemetrexed plus carboplatin compared with gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;27(19):3217-24. Epub 2009 May 11. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  3. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, Lu S, Zhang L, Hu C, Hu C, Luo Y, Chen L, Ye M, Huang J, Zhi X, Zhang Y, Xiu Q, Ma J, Zhang L, You C. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):735-42. Epub 2011 Jul 23. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, Lu S, Zhang L, Hu C, Hu C, Luo Y, Chen L, Ye M, Huang J, Zhi X, Zhang Y, Xiu Q, Ma J, Zhang L, You C. Final overall survival results from a randomised, phase III study of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802). Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1877-83. Epub 2015 Jul 3. link to original article PubMed

Carboplatin & Paclitaxel

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Johnson et al. 2004 Randomized Phase II PacCBev Seems to have inferior TTP
Sandler et al. 2006 (ECOG 4599) Phase III PacCBev -> Maintenance Bev Inferior OS
Lilenbaum et al. 2008 Phase III Erlotinib Seems to have superior OS
Mok et al. 2009 (IPASS) Phase III Gefitinib Inferior PFS
Maemondo et al. 2010 Phase III Gefitinib Inferior PFS
Socinski et al. 2012 Phase III Carboplatin & nabPaclitaxel Inferior ORR
Langer et al. 2014 Phase III Carboplatin, Figitumumab, Paclitaxel Might have superior OS
Ramalingam et al. 2016 Randomized Phase II Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Veliparib Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 3 to 6 cycles

Patients in Socinski et al. 2012 "could continue in the absence of progressive disease and unacceptable toxicity per the investigator's discretion."

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Lynch et al. 2012 Randomized Phase II Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Ipilimumab Seems to have inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Regimen #3, weekly paclitaxel

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Quoix et al. 2011 (IFCT-0501) Phase III Gemcitabine Superior OS
Vinorelbine Superior OS

Study involved only patients 70 to 89 years old

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Growth factor support was not recommended as primary prophylaxis during cycle 1, but could be used if the patient develops grade 3-4 neutropenia

28-day cycle for up to 4 cycles

Regimen #4

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Mok et al. 2009 (IPASS) Phase III Gefitinib Inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 6 cycles

Regimen #5

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Schiller et al. 2002 Phase III Cisplatin & Docetaxel Seems not superior
Cisplatin & Gemcitabine Seems not superior
Cisplatin & Paclitaxel Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J, Johnson DH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 10;346(2):92-8. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Johnson DH, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny WF, Herbst RS, Nemunaitis JJ, Jablons DM, Langer CJ, DeVore RF 3rd, Gaudreault J, Damico LA, Holmgren E, Kabbinavar F. Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2184-91. link to original article PubMed
  3. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, Lilenbaum R, Johnson DH. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2542-50. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Subset analysis: Ramalingam SS, Dahlberg SE, Langer CJ, Gray R, Belani CP, Brahmer JR, Sandler AB, Schiller JH, Johnson DH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Outcomes for elderly, advanced-stage non small-cell lung cancer patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel: analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):60-5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Lilenbaum R, Axelrod R, Thomas S, Dowlati A, Seigel L, Albert D, Witt K, Botkin D. Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib or standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 20;26(6):863-9. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  5. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y, Nishiwaki Y, Ohe Y, Yang JJ, Chewaskulyong B, Jiang H, Duffield EL, Watkins CL, Armour AA, Fukuoka M. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):947-57. Epub 2009 Aug 19. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  6. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, Gemma A, Harada M, Yoshizawa H, Kinoshita I, Fujita Y, Okinaga S, Hirano H, Yoshimori K, Harada T, Ogura T, Ando M, Miyazawa H, Tanaka T, Saijo Y, Hagiwara K, Morita S, Nukiwa T; North-East Japan Study Group. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2380-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  7. Quoix E, Zalcman G, Oster JP, Westeel V, Pichon E, Lavolé A, Dauba J, Debieuvre D, Souquet PJ, Bigay-Game L, Dansin E, Poudenx M, Molinier O, Vaylet F, Moro-Sibilot D, Herman D, Bennouna J, Tredaniel J, Ducoloné A, Lebitasy MP, Baudrin L, Laporte S, Milleron B; Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique. Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011 Sep 17;378(9796):1079-88. Epub 2011 Aug 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  8. Lynch TJ, Bondarenko I, Luft A, Serwatowski P, Barlesi F, Chacko R, Sebastian M, Neal J, Lu H, Cuillerot JM, Reck M. Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2046-54. Epub 2012 Apr 30. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  9. Socinski MA, Bondarenko I, Karaseva NA, Makhson AM, Vynnychenko I, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Bhar P, Zhang H, Iglesias JL, Renschler MF. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2055-62. Epub 2012 Apr 30. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  10. Langer CJ, Novello S, Park K, Krzakowski M, Karp DD, Mok T, Benner RJ, Scranton JR, Olszanski AJ, Jassem J. Randomized, phase III trial of first-line figitumumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin alone in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 1;32(19):2059-66. Epub 2014 Jun 2. link to original article PubMed
  11. Ramalingam SS, Blais N, Mazieres J, Reck M, Jones CM, Juhasz E, Urban L, Orlov S, Barlesi F, Kio E, Keiholz U, Qin Q, Qian J, Nickner C, Dziubinski J, Xiong H, Ansell P, McKee M, Giranda V, Gorbunova V. Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of Veliparib in Combination with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 10. [Epub ahead of print] link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Carboplatin & Paclitaxel, nanoparticle albumin-bound

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Socinski et al. 2012 Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Superior ORR

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 6 cycles; treatment could continue at physician's discretion if there was no progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Socinski MA, Bondarenko I, Karaseva NA, Makhson AM, Vynnychenko I, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Bhar P, Zhang H, Iglesias JL, Renschler MF. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2055-62. Epub 2012 Apr 30. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Bevacizumab (PacCBev)

back to top

PacCBev: Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Bevacizumab

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Patel et al. 2013 (PointBreak) Phase III PemCBev -> Maintenance PemBev Seems to have inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Premedications per paclitaxel label
  • Erythropoietic agents or granulocyte colony-stimulating factors allowed per ASCO & NCCN guidelines

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease proceeded to bevacizumab maintenance therapy.

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Johnson et al. 2004 Randomized Phase II Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Seems to have superior TTP
Sandler et al. 2006 (ECOG 4599) Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Superior OS

Chemotherapy

  • Carboplatin (Paraplatin) AUC 6 IV over 15 to 30 minutes once on day 1, given second, starting 60 minutes after the completion of paclitaxel
  • Paclitaxel (Taxol) 200 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours once on day 1, given first
  • Bevacizumab (Avastin) 15 mg/kg IV on day 1, given third, starting 60 minutes after the completion of carboplatin
    • Infusion time for bevacizumab per Johnson, et al. 2004 was over 90 minutes for cycle 1; if tolerated, bevacizumab was given over 30 to 60 minutes for cycles 2 and later

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles, or until progression of disease, or unacceptable toxicity

After 6 cycles, patients in ECOG 4599 who had stable disease or response continued to bevacizumab maintenance therapy.

References

  1. Johnson DH, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny WF, Herbst RS, Nemunaitis JJ, Jablons DM, Langer CJ, DeVore RF 3rd, Gaudreault J, Damico LA, Holmgren E, Kabbinavar F. Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2184-91. link to original article PubMed
  2. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, Lilenbaum R, Johnson DH. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2542-50. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Subset analysis: Ramalingam SS, Dahlberg SE, Langer CJ, Gray R, Belani CP, Brahmer JR, Sandler AB, Schiller JH, Johnson DH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Outcomes for elderly, advanced-stage non small-cell lung cancer patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel: analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):60-5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Patel JD, Socinski MA, Garon EB, Reynolds CH, Spigel DR, Olsen MR, Hermann RC, Jotte RM, Beck T, Richards DA, Guba SC, Liu J, Frimodt-Moller B, John WJ, Obasaju CK, Pennella EJ, Bonomi P, Govindan R. PointBreak: a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 1;31(34):4349-57. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Ipilimumab

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Lynch et al. 2012 Randomized Phase II Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Seems to have superior PFS

Note: this is the "phased" approach to this regimen.

Chemoimmunotherapy

Supportive medications

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Patients without progressive disease proceeded to receive maintenance ipilimumab therapy.

References

  1. Lynch TJ, Bondarenko I, Luft A, Serwatowski P, Barlesi F, Chacko R, Sebastian M, Neal J, Lu H, Cuillerot JM, Reck M. Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2046-54. Epub 2012 Apr 30. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Carboplatin & Pemetrexed

back to top

Example orders

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ardizzoni et al. 2012 (GOIRC 02-2006) Randomized Phase II Pemetrexed Seems not superior
Zukin et al. 2013 Phase III Pemetrexed Superior OS
Langer et al. 2016 (KEYNOTE-021) Randomized Phase II Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, Pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab maintenance +/- pemetrexed maintenance Inferior ORR
Mok et al. 2016 (AURA3) Phase III Osimertinib Inferior PFS

Patients enrolled in AURA3 had locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with progression after first-line EGFR TKI therapy, and were required to have presence of an EGFR p.T790M mutation.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • (Ardizzoni et al. 2012 contained more details):
  • Dexamethasone (Decadron) 4 mg or equivalent corticosteroid PO BID on the day before, the day of, and day after each dose of pemetrexed
  • Folic acid 350 to 600 mcg PO once per day, starting 1 to 2 weeks before the first dose of pemetrexed, to be taken throughout pemetrexed therapy.
  • Cyanocobalamin (Vitamin B12) 1000 mcg IM once every 9 weeks, first dose 1 to 2 weeks before the first dose of pemetrexed, to be given throughout pemetrexed therapy

21-day cycle for up to 4 cycles, 6 cycles (AURA3), or until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal

Treatment in KEYNOTE-021 and AURA3 followed by optional pemetrexed maintenance.

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Grønberg et al. 2009 Phase III Carboplatin & Gemcitabine Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

21-day cycles

References

  1. Grønberg BH, Bremnes RM, Fløtten O, Amundsen T, Brunsvig PF, Hjelde HH, Kaasa S, von Plessen C, Stornes F, Tollåli T, Wammer F, Aasebø U, Sundstrøm S. Phase III study by the Norwegian lung cancer study group: pemetrexed plus carboplatin compared with gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;27(19):3217-24. Epub 2009 May 11. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Ardizzoni A, Tiseo M, Boni L, Vincent AD, Passalacqua R, Buti S, Amoroso D, Camerini A, Labianca R, Genestreti G, Boni C, Ciuffreda L, Di Costanzo F, de Marinis F, Crinò L, Santo A, Pazzola A, Barbieri F, Zilembo N, Colantonio I, Tibaldi C, Mattioli R, Cafferata MA, Camisa R, Smit EF. Pemetrexed versus pemetrexed and carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the GOIRC 02-2006 randomized phase II study and pooled analysis with the NVALT7 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):4501-7. Epub 2012 Oct 29. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Zukin M, Barrios CH, Rodrigues Pereira J, De Albuquerque Ribeiro R, de Mendonça Beato CA, do Nascimento YN, Murad A, Franke FA, Precivale M, de Lima Araujo LH, Da Rocha Baldotto CS, Vieira FM, Small IA, Ferreira CG, Lilenbaum RC. Randomized Phase III Trial of Single-Agent Pemetrexed Versus Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 2. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2849-53. Epub 2013 Jun 17. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Langer CJ, Gadgeel SM, Borghaei H, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Patnaik A, Powell SF, Gentzler RD, Martins RG, Stevenson JP, Jalal SI, Panwalkar A, Yang JC, Gubens M, Sequist LV, Awad MM, Fiore J, Ge Y, Raftopoulos H, Gandhi L; KEYNOTE-021 investigators.. Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for advanced, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1497-1508. Epub 2016 Oct 10. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  5. Jänne PA, Yang JC, Kim DW, Planchard D, Ohe Y, Ramalingam SS, Ahn MJ, Kim SW, Su WC, Horn L, Haggstrom D, Felip E, Kim JH, Frewer P, Cantarini M, Brown KH, Dickinson PA, Ghiorghiu S, Ranson M. AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1689-99. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  6. Mok TS, Wu YL, Ahn MJ, Garassino MC, Kim HR, Ramalingam SS, Shepherd FA, He Y, Akamatsu H, Theelen WS, Lee CK, Sebastian M, Templeton A, Mann H, Marotti M, Ghiorghiu S, Papadimitrakopoulou VA; AURA3 Investigators. Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640. Epub 2016 Dec 6. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, Bevacizumab (PemCBev)

back to top

PemCBev: Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, Bevacizumab

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Patel et al. 2013 (PointBreak) Phase III PacCBev -> Maintenance Bev Seems to have superior PFS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Premedications, folic acid, and vitamin supplementation per pemetrexed label
  • Erythropoietic agents or granulocyte colony-stimulating factors allowed per ASCO & NCCN guidelines

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease proceeded to bevacizumab & pemetrexed maintenance therapy.

References

  1. Patel JD, Socinski MA, Garon EB, Reynolds CH, Spigel DR, Olsen MR, Hermann RC, Jotte RM, Beck T, Richards DA, Guba SC, Liu J, Frimodt-Moller B, John WJ, Obasaju CK, Pennella EJ, Bonomi P, Govindan R. PointBreak: a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 1;31(34):4349-57. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, Pembrolizumab

Source: Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, Pembrolizumab in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer


Regimen

Cisplatin & Docetaxel

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Mitsudomi et al. 2016 (WJTOG3405) Phase III Gefitinib Inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 3 to 6 cycles

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Schiller et al. 2002 Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Seems not superior
Cisplatin & Gemcitabine Seems not superior
Cisplatin & Paclitaxel Seems not superior
Fossella et al. 2003 (TAX 326) Phase III Carboplatin & Docetaxel
Cisplatin & Vinorelbine Seems to have superior OS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J, Johnson DH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 10;346(2):92-8. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Fossella F, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Pluzanska A, Gorbounova V, Kaukel E, Mattson KV, Ramlau R, Szczesna A, Fidias P, Millward M, Belani CP. Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TAX 326 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3016-24. Epub 2003 Jul 1. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  3. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, Seto T, Satouchi M, Tada H, Hirashima T, Asami K, Katakami N, Takada M, Yoshioka H, Shibata K, Kudoh S, Shimizu E, Saito H, Toyooka S, Nakagawa K, Fukuoka M; West Japan Oncology Group.. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Feb;11(2):121-8. Epub 2009 Dec 18. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Gemcitabine

back to top

GP: Gemcitabine & Platinol (Cisplatin)

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Thatcher et al. 2015 (SQUIRE) Phase III Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, Necitumumab Seems to have inferior OS
Wu et al. 2015 (ENSURE) Phase III Erlotinib Inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

Patients in ENSURE received up to 4 cycles.

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Wu et al. 2014 (LUX-Lung 6) Phase III Afatinib Inferior PFS

Tumor specimen was required to be EGFR mutation-positive.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Regimen #3

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Schiller et al. 2002 Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Seems not superior
Cisplatin & Docetaxel Seems not superior
Cisplatin & Paclitaxel Superior PFS
Scagliotti et al. 2008 Phase III Cisplatin & Pemetrexed Seems non-inferior

Note: the subgroup of Scagliotti et al. 2008 with adenocarcinoma seemed to have superior OS with this regimen.

Chemotherapy

28-day cycles

References

  1. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J, Johnson DH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 10;346(2):92-8. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, Biesma B, Vansteenkiste J, Manegold C, Serwatowski P, Gatzemeier U, Digumarti R, Zukin M, Lee JS, Mellemgaard A, Park K, Patil S, Rolski J, Goksel T, de Marinis F, Simms L, Sugarman KP, Gandara D. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3543-51. Epub 2008 May 27. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  3. Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Li W, Hou M, Shi JH, Lee KY, Xu CR, Massey D, Kim M, Shi Y, Geater SL. Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):213-22. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, Sebastian M, Popat S, Yamamoto N, Zhou C, Hu CP, O'Byrne K, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Geater SL, Lee KY, Tsai CM, Gorbunova V, Hirsh V, Bennouna J, Orlov S, Mok T, Boyer M, Su WC, Lee KH, Kato T, Massey D, Shahidi M, Zazulina V, Sequist LV. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51. link to SD article PubMed
    2. Subgroup analysis: Schuler M, Wu YL, Hirsh V, O'Byrne K, Yamamoto N, Mok T, Popat S, Sequist LV, Massey D, Zazulina V, Yang JC. First-Line Afatinib versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Common Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations and Brain Metastases. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Mar;11(3):380-90. link to SD article PubMed
  4. Thatcher N, Hirsch FR, Luft AV, Szczesna A, Ciuleanu TE, Dediu M, Ramlau R, Galiulin RK, Bálint B, Losonczy G, Kazarnowicz A, Park K, Schumann C, Reck M, Depenbrock H, Nanda S, Kruljac-Letunic A, Kurek R, Paz-Ares L, Socinski MA; SQUIRE Investigators. Necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin alone as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SQUIRE): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):763-74. Epub 2015 Jun 1. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  5. Wu YL, Zhou C, Liam CK, Wu G, Liu X, Zhong Z, Lu S, Cheng Y, Han B, Chen L, Huang C, Qin S, Zhu Y, Pan H, Liang H, Li E, Jiang G, How SH, Fernando MC, Zhang Y, Xia F, Zuo Y. First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1883-9. Epub 2015 Jun 23. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, Necitumumab

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Thatcher et al. 2015 (SQUIRE) Phase III Cisplatin & Gemcitabine Seems to have superior OS

Patients had stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Antiemetic premedications for gemcitabine and cisplatin "according to local practice."
  • "Pre-emptive treatment for skin toxicity was allowed only after the first cycle."

21-day cycle for 6 cycles

Patients who were free of disease progression proceeded to maintenance necitumumab.

References

  1. Thatcher N, Hirsch FR, Luft AV, Szczesna A, Ciuleanu TE, Dediu M, Ramlau R, Galiulin RK, Bálint B, Losonczy G, Kazarnowicz A, Park K, Schumann C, Reck M, Depenbrock H, Nanda S, Kruljac-Letunic A, Kurek R, Paz-Ares L, Socinski MA; SQUIRE Investigators. Necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin alone as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SQUIRE): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):763-74. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Paclitaxel

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Schiller et al. 2002 Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Seems not superior
Cisplatin & Docetaxel Seems not superior
Cisplatin & Gemcitabine Inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J, Johnson DH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 10;346(2):92-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Pemetrexed

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Scagliotti et al. 2008 Phase III Cisplatin & Gemcitabine Seems non-inferior
Sequist et al. 2013 (LUX-Lung 3) Phase III Afatinib Inferior PFS
Paz-Ares et al. 2015 (INSPIRE) Phase III Cisplatin, Pemetrexed, Necitumumab Seems not superior
Soria et al. 2015 (IMPRESS) Phase III Cisplatin, Pemetrexed, Gefitinib Seems not superior
Mok et al. 2016 (AURA3) Phase III Osimertinib Inferior PFS

Note: the subgroup of Scagliotti et al. 2008 with adenocarcinoma seemed to have inferior OS with this regimen. Patients enrolled in AURA3 had locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with progression after first-line EGFR TKI therapy, and were required to have presence of an EGFR p.T790M mutation.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Patients without disease progression in AURA3 could optionally proceed to pemetrexed maintenance after 4 cycles.

Regimen #2

Study Evidence
Paz-Ares et al. 2012 (PARAMOUNT) Non-randomized portion of RCT

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Folic acid, Cyanocobalamin (Vitamin B12), prophylactic Dexamethasone (Decadron)
  • "Investigators followed current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines for use of colony-stimulating factors and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents."

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Subsequently patients were randomized to placebo versus pemetrexed maintenance.

References

  1. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, Biesma B, Vansteenkiste J, Manegold C, Serwatowski P, Gatzemeier U, Digumarti R, Zukin M, Lee JS, Mellemgaard A, Park K, Patil S, Rolski J, Goksel T, de Marinis F, Simms L, Sugarman KP, Gandara D. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3543-51. Epub 2008 May 27. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Paz-Ares L, de Marinis F, Dediu M, Thomas M, Pujol JL, Bidoli P, Molinier O, Sahoo TP, Laack E, Reck M, Corral J, Melemed S, John W, Chouaki N, Zimmermann AH, Visseren-Grul C, Gridelli C. Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):247-55. Epub 2012 Feb 16. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Paz-Ares LG, de Marinis F, Dediu M, Thomas M, Pujol JL, Bidoli P, Molinier O, Sahoo TP, Laack E, Reck M, Corral J, Melemed S, John W, Chouaki N, Zimmermann AH, Visseren-Grul C, Gridelli C. PARAMOUNT: Final Overall Survival Results of the Phase III Study of Maintenance Pemetrexed Versus Placebo Immediately After Induction Treatment With Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2895-902. Epub 2013 Jul 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, O'Byrne K, Hirsh V, Mok T, Geater SL, Orlov S, Tsai CM, Boyer M, Su WC, Bennouna J, Kato T, Gorbunova V, Lee KH, Shah R, Massey D, Zazulina V, Shahidi M, Schuler M. Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3327-34. Epub 2013 Jul 1. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Subgroup analysis: Yang JC, Hirsh V, Schuler M, Yamamoto N, O'Byrne KJ, Mok TS, Zazulina V, Shahidi M, Lungershausen J, Massey D, Palmer M, Sequist LV. Symptom Control and Quality of Life in LUX-Lung 3: A Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin/Pemetrexed in Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3342-50. Epub 2013 Jul 1. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    2. Update: Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, Sebastian M, Popat S, Yamamoto N, Zhou C, Hu CP, O'Byrne K, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Geater SL, Lee KY, Tsai CM, Gorbunova V, Hirsh V, Bennouna J, Orlov S, Mok T, Boyer M, Su WC, Lee KH, Kato T, Massey D, Shahidi M, Zazulina V, Sequist LV. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51. link to SD article PubMed
    3. Subgroup analysis: Schuler M, Wu YL, Hirsh V, O'Byrne K, Yamamoto N, Mok T, Popat S, Sequist LV, Massey D, Zazulina V, Yang JC. First-Line Afatinib versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Common Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations and Brain Metastases. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Mar;11(3):380-90. link to SD article PubMed
  4. Paz-Ares L, Mezger J, Ciuleanu TE, Fischer JR, von Pawel J, Provencio M, Kazarnowicz A, Losonczy G, de Castro G Jr, Szczesna A, Crino L, Reck M, Ramlau R, Ulsperger E, Schumann C, Miziara JE, Lessa ÁE, Dediu M, Bálint B, Depenbrock H, Soldatenkova V, Kurek R, Hirsch FR, Thatcher N, Socinski MA; INSPIRE investigators. Necitumumab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (INSPIRE): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):328-37. Epub 2015 Feb 18. link to original article PubMed
  5. Soria JC, Wu YL, Nakagawa K, Kim SW, Yang JJ, Ahn MJ, Wang J, Yang JC, Lu Y, Atagi S, Ponce S, Lee DH, Liu Y, Yoh K, Zhou JY, Shi X, Webster A, Jiang H, Mok TS. Gefitinib plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer after progression on first-line gefitinib (IMPRESS): a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):990-8. Epub 2015 Jul 6. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed
  6. Mok TS, Wu YL, Ahn MJ, Garassino MC, Kim HR, Ramalingam SS, Shepherd FA, He Y, Akamatsu H, Theelen WS, Lee CK, Sebastian M, Templeton A, Mann H, Marotti M, Ghiorghiu S, Papadimitrakopoulou VA; AURA3 Investigators. Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640. Epub 2016 Dec 6. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin, Pemetrexed, Bevacizumab

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Barlesi et al. 2013 (AVAPERL (MO22089)) Phase II

Chemotherapy

  • Cisplatin (Platinol) 75 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1
  • Pemetrexed (Alimta) 500 mg/m2 IV over 10 minutes once on day 1
  • Bevacizumab (Avastin) 7.5 mg/kg IV once on day 1; administered over 90 minutes for the first dose, and if well tolerated, subsequent infusions were given over 60 minutes, then 30 minutes

Supportive medications

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Patients with complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) were randomized to bevacizumab maintenance versus bevacizumab & pemetrexed maintenance.

References

  1. Barlesi F, Scherpereel A, Rittmeyer A, Pazzola A, Ferrer Tur N, Kim JH, Ahn MJ, Aerts JG, Gorbunova V, Vikström A, Wong EK, Perez-Moreno P, Mitchell L, Groen HJ. Randomized Phase III Trial of Maintenance Bevacizumab With or Without Pemetrexed After First-Line Induction With Bevacizumab, Cisplatin, and Pemetrexed in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: AVAPERL (MO22089). J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 20;31(24):3004-11. Epub 2013 Jul 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Vinorelbine

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Pirker et al. 2009 (FLEX) Phase III Cisplatin, Vinorelbine, Cetuximab Seems to have inferior OS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Fossella et al. 2003 (TAX 326) Phase III Carboplatin & Docetaxel Seems not superior
Cisplatin & Docetaxel Seems to have inferior OS

Chemotherapy

28-day cycles

References

  1. Fossella F, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Pluzanska A, Gorbounova V, Kaukel E, Mattson KV, Ramlau R, Szczesna A, Fidias P, Millward M, Belani CP. Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TAX 326 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3016-24. Epub 2003 Jul 1. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Vynnychenko I, Park K, Yu CT, Ganul V, Roh JK, Bajetta E, O'Byrne K, de Marinis F, Eberhardt W, Goddemeier T, Emig M, Gatzemeier U; FLEX Study Team. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 May 2;373(9674):1525-31. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin, Vinorelbine, Cetuximab

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Pirker et al. 2009 (FLEX) Phase III Cisplatin & Vinorelbine Seems to have superior OS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Cetuximab was then to continue until progression or intolerable toxicity.

References

  1. Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Vynnychenko I, Park K, Yu CT, Ganul V, Roh JK, Bajetta E, O'Byrne K, de Marinis F, Eberhardt W, Goddemeier T, Emig M, Gatzemeier U; FLEX Study Team. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 May 2;373(9674):1525-31. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Docetaxel (Taxotere)

back to top

Example orders

Regimen #1, 3-week docetaxel

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Hanna et al. 2004 Phase III Pemetrexed Inconclusive whether non-inferior
Chen et al. 2006 Phase III Docetaxel 35 mg/m2, 3 out of 4 wks Seems not superior
Docetaxel 40 mg/m2, 2 out of 3 wks Seems not superior
Kim et al. 2008 (INTEREST) Phase III Gefitinib Seems non-inferior
Shaw et al. 2013 Phase III Crizotinib Inferior PFS
Garassino et al. 2013 (TAILOR) Phase III Erlotinib Seems to have superior OS
Reck et al. 2014 (LUME-Lung 1) Phase III Docetaxel & Nintedanib Inferior PFS
Garon et al. 2014 (REVEL) Phase III Docetaxel & Ramucirumab Seems to have inferior OS
Brahmer et al. 2015 (CheckMate 017) Phase III Nivolumab Inferior OS
Borghaei et al. 2015 (CheckMate 057) Phase III Nivolumab Inferior OS
Herbst et al. 2015 (KEYNOTE-010) Phase II/III Pembrolizumab Inferior OS
Fehrenbacher et al. 2016 (POPLAR) Randomized Phase II Atezolizumab Seems to have inferior OS
Rittmeyer et al. 2017 (OAK) Phase III Atezolizumab Inferior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Per Hanna et al. 2004: Dexamethasone (Decadron) 8 mg PO BID the day before, the day of, and the day after docetaxel
  • Per Chem et al. 2006: Dexamethasone (Decadron) 8 mg PO once 12 hours before docetaxel, 10 mg IV once 30 minutes before docetaxel, and 8 mg PO 12 hours after docetaxel

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/physician choice

Regimen #2, 35 mg/m2, 3 out of 4 weeks

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Chen et al. 2006 Phase III Docetaxel 40 mg/m2, 2 out of 3 wks Seems not superior
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2, every 3 wks Seems not superior
Garassino et al. 2013 (TAILOR) Phase III Erlotinib Seems to have superior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Dexamethasone (Decadron) 8 mg PO once 12 hours before docetaxel, 10 mg IV once 30 minutes before docetaxel, and 8 mg PO 12 hours after docetaxel

28-day cycles

References

  1. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Pereira JR, De Marinis F, von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Tsao TC, Pless M, Muller T, Lim HL, Desch C, Szondy K, Gervais R, Shaharyar, Manegold C, Paul S, Paoletti P, Einhorn L, Bunn PA Jr. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1589-97. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Chen YM, Shih JF, Perng RP, Tsai CM, Whang-Peng J. A randomized trial of different docetaxel schedules in non-small cell lung cancer patients who failed previous platinum-based chemotherapy. Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):1031-8. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Kim ES, Hirsh V, Mok T, Socinski MA, Gervais R, Wu YL, Li LY, Watkins CL, Sellers MV, Lowe ES, Sun Y, Liao ML, Osterlind K, Reck M, Armour AA, Shepherd FA, Lippman SM, Douillard JY. Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2008 Nov 22;372(9652):1809-18. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  4. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K, Seto T, Crinó L, Ahn MJ, De Pas T, Besse B, Solomon BJ, Blackhall F, Wu YL, Thomas M, O'Byrne KJ, Moro-Sibilot D, Camidge DR, Mok T, Hirsh V, Riely GJ, Iyer S, Tassell V, Polli A, Wilner KD, Jänne PA. Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20;368(25):2385-94. Epub 2013 Jun 1. link to original article link to supplementary appendix contains verified protocol PubMed
  5. Garassino MC, Martelli O, Broggini M, Farina G, Veronese S, Rulli E, Bianchi F, Bettini A, Longo F, Moscetti L, Tomirotti M, Marabese M, Ganzinelli M, Lauricella C, Labianca R, Floriani I, Giaccone G, Torri V, Scanni A, Marsoni S; TAILOR trialists. Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):981-8. Epub 2013 Jul 22. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed
  6. Reck M, Kaiser R, Mellemgaard A, Douillard JY, Orlov S, Krzakowski M, von Pawel J, Gottfried M, Bondarenko I, Liao M, Gann CN, Barrueco J, Gaschler-Markefski B, Novello S; LUME-Lung 1 Study Group. Docetaxel plus nintedanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 1): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):143-55. 2. Epub 2014 Jan 9. link to original article PubMed
  7. Garon EB, Ciuleanu TE, Arrieta O, Prabhash K, Syrigos KN, Goksel T, Park K, Gorbunova V, Kowalyszyn RD, Pikiel J, Czyzewicz G, Orlov SV, Lewanski CR, Thomas M, Bidoli P, Dakhil S, Gans S, Kim JH, Grigorescu A, Karaseva N, Reck M, Cappuzzo F, Alexandris E, Sashegyi A, Yurasov S, Pérol M. Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014 Aug 23;384(9944):665-73. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  8. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crinò L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, Antonia S, Pluzanski A, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Waterhouse D, Ready N, Gainor J, Arén Frontera O, Havel L, Steins M, Garassino MC, Aerts JG, Domine M, Paz-Ares L, Reck M, Baudelet C, Harbison CT, Lestini B, Spigel DR. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35. Epub 2015 May 31. link to original article PubMed
  9. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, Chow LQ, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhäufl M, Arrieta O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Lena H, Poddubskaya E, Gerber DE, Gettinger SN, Rudin CM, Rizvi N, Crinò L, Blumenschein GR Jr, Antonia SJ, Dorange C, Harbison CT, Graf Finckenstein F, Brahmer JR. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39. Epub 2015 Sep 27. link to original article PubMed
  10. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Pérez-Gracia JL, Han JY, Molina J, Kim JH, Arvis CD, Ahn MJ, Majem M, Fidler MJ, de Castro G Jr, Garrido M, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Im E, Dolled-Filhart M, Garon EB. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-50. Epub 2015 Dec 19. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  11. Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, Vansteenkiste J, Mazieres J, Park K, Smith D, Artal-Cortes A, Lewanski C, Braiteh F, Waterkamp D, He P, Zou W, Chen DS, Yi J, Sandler A, Rittmeyer A; POPLAR Study Group. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46. Epub 2016 Mar 9. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  12. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J, Gadgeel SM, Hida T, Kowalski DM, Dols MC, Cortinovis DL, Leach J, Polikoff J, Barrios C, Kabbinavar F, Frontera OA, De Marinis F, Turna H, Lee JS, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, He P, Chen DS, Sandler A, Gandara DR; OAK Study Group. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Jan 21;389(10066):255-265. link to origial article contains protocol PubMed

Docetaxel & Ramucirumab

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Garon et al. 2014 (REVEL) Phase III Docetaxel Seems to have superior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Colony-stimulating factors and erythroid-stimulating factor use per investigator discretion.

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or death

References

  1. Garon EB, Ciuleanu TE, Arrieta O, Prabhash K, Syrigos KN, Goksel T, Park K, Gorbunova V, Kowalyszyn RD, Pikiel J, Czyzewicz G, Orlov SV, Lewanski CR, Thomas M, Bidoli P, Dakhil S, Gans S, Kim JH, Grigorescu A, Karaseva N, Reck M, Cappuzzo F, Alexandris E, Sashegyi A, Yurasov S, Pérol M. Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014 Aug 23;384(9944):665-73. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Erlotinib (Tarceva)

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Shepherd et al. 2005 (NCIC CTG BR.21) Phase III Placebo Superior OS
Lilenbaum et al. 2008 Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Seems to have inferior OS
Zhou et al. 2011 (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802) Phase III Carboplatin & Gemcitabine Superior PFS
Ramalingam et al. 2012 Randomized Phase II Dacomitinib Seems to have inferior PFS
Garassino et al. 2013 (TAILOR) Phase III Docetaxel Seems to have inferior OS
Ramalingam et al. 2014 (ARCHER 1009) Phase III Dacomitinib Seems not superior
Scagliotti et al. 2015 Phase III Erlotinib & Figitumumab Seems not superior
Wu et al. 2015 (ENSURE) Phase III Cisplatin & Gemcitabine Superior PFS
Soria et al. 2015 (LUX-Lung 8) Phase III Afatinib Inferior OS
Urata et al. 2016 (WJOG 5108L) Phase III Gefitinib Inconclusive whether non-inferior
Neal et al. 2016 (ECOG-ACRIN 1512) Randomized Phase II Cabozantinib Inferior PFS
Cabozantinib & Erlotinib Inferior PFS
Spigel et al. 2016 (METLung) Phase III Erlotinib & Onartuzumab Might have superior OS

Chemotherapy

Continued until progression or intolerance

Regimen #2, low-dose

Study Evidence
Yeo et al. 2010 Retrospective

Chemotherapy

Continued until progression or intolerance

References

  1. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Campos D, Maoleekoonpiroj S, Smylie M, Martins R, van Kooten M, Dediu M, Findlay B, Tu D, Johnston D, Bezjak A, Clark G, Santabárbara P, Seymour L; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Lilenbaum R, Axelrod R, Thomas S, Dowlati A, Seigel L, Albert D, Witt K, Botkin D. Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib or standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 20;26(6):863-9. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  3. Yeo WL, Riely GJ, Yeap BY, Lau MW, Warner JL, Bodio K, Huberman MS, Kris MG, Tenen DG, Pao W, Kobayashi S, Costa DB. Erlotinib at a dose of 25 mg daily for non-small cell lung cancers with EGFR mutations. J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Jul;5(7):1048-53. link to PMC article PubMed
  4. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, Lu S, Zhang L, Hu C, Hu C, Luo Y, Chen L, Ye M, Huang J, Zhi X, Zhang Y, Xiu Q, Ma J, Zhang L, You C. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):735-42. Epub 2011 Jul 23. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, Lu S, Zhang L, Hu C, Hu C, Luo Y, Chen L, Ye M, Huang J, Zhi X, Zhang Y, Xiu Q, Ma J, Zhang L, You C. Final overall survival results from a randomised, phase III study of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802). Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1877-83. Epub 2015 Jul 3. link to original article PubMed
  5. Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, Palmero R, Garcia-Gomez R, Pallares C, Sanchez JM, Porta R, Cobo M, Garrido P, Longo F, Moran T, Insa A, De Marinis F, Corre R, Bover I, Illiano A, Dansin E, de Castro J, Milella M, Reguart N, Altavilla G, Jimenez U, Provencio M, Moreno MA, Terrasa J, Muñoz-Langa J, Valdivia J, Isla D, Domine M, Molinier O, Mazieres J, Baize N, Garcia-Campelo R, Robinet G, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Lopez-Vivanco G, Gebbia V, Ferrera-Delgado L, Bombaron P, Bernabe R, Bearz A, Artal A, Cortesi E, Rolfo C, Sanchez-Ronco M, Drozdowskyj A, Queralt C, de Aguirre I, Ramirez JL, Sanchez JJ, Molina MA, Taron M, Paz-Ares L; Spanish Lung Cancer Group in collaboration with Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie and Associazione Italiana Oncologia Toracica. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):239-46. Epub 2012 Jan 26. link to SD article PubMed
  6. Ramalingam SS, Blackhall F, Krzakowski M, Barrios CH, Park K, Bover I, Seog Heo D, Rosell R, Talbot DC, Frank R, Letrent SP, Ruiz-Garcia A, Taylor I, Liang JQ, Campbell AK, O'Connell J, Boyer M. Randomized phase II study of dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 20;30(27):3337-44. link to original article PubMed
  7. Garassino MC, Martelli O, Broggini M, Farina G, Veronese S, Rulli E, Bianchi F, Bettini A, Longo F, Moscetti L, Tomirotti M, Marabese M, Ganzinelli M, Lauricella C, Labianca R, Floriani I, Giaccone G, Torri V, Scanni A, Marsoni S; TAILOR trialists. Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):981-8. Epub 2013 Jul 22. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed
  8. Ramalingam SS, Jänne PA, Mok T, O'Byrne K, Boyer MJ, Von Pawel J, Pluzanski A, Shtivelband M, Docampo LI, Bennouna J, Zhang H, Liang JQ, Doherty JP, Taylor I, Mather CB, Goldberg Z, O'Connell J, Paz-Ares L. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced-stage, previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1009): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1369-78. link to original article PubMed
  9. Scagliotti GV, Bondarenko I, Blackhall F, Barlesi F, Hsia TC, Jassem J, Milanowski J, Popat S, Sanchez-Torres JM, Novello S, Benner RJ, Green S, Molpus K, Soria JC, Shepherd FA. Randomized, phase III trial of figitumumab in combination with erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in patients with nonadenocarcinoma nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015 Mar;26(3):497-504. Epub 2014 Nov 13. link to original article PubMed
  10. Wu YL, Zhou C, Liam CK, Wu G, Liu X, Zhong Z, Lu S, Cheng Y, Han B, Chen L, Huang C, Qin S, Zhu Y, Pan H, Liang H, Li E, Jiang G, How SH, Fernando MC, Zhang Y, Xia F, Zuo Y. First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1883-9. Epub 2015 Jun 23. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  11. Soria JC, Felip E, Cobo M, Lu S, Syrigos K, Lee KH, Göker E, Georgoulias V, Li W, Isla D, Guclu SZ, Morabito A, Min YJ, Ardizzoni A, Gadgeel SM, Wang B, Chand VK, Goss GD; LUX-Lung 8 Investigators. Afatinib versus erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUX-Lung 8): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):897-907. Epub 2015 Jul 5. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  12. Urata Y, Katakami N, Morita S, Kaji R, Yoshioka H, Seto T, Satouchi M, Iwamoto Y, Kanehara M, Fujimoto D, Ikeda N, Murakami H, Daga H, Oguri T, Goto I, Imamura F, Sugawara S, Saka H, Nogami N, Negoro S, Nakagawa K, Nakanishi Y. Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Gefitinib With Erlotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: WJOG 5108L. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3248-57. Epub 2016 Mar 28. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  13. Neal JW, Dahlberg SE, Wakelee HA, Aisner SC, Bowden M, Huang Y, Carbone DP, Gerstner GJ, Lerner RE, Rubin JL, Owonikoko TK, Stella PJ, Steen PD, Khalid AA, Ramalingam SS; ECOG-ACRIN 1512 Investigators.. Erlotinib, cabozantinib, or erlotinib plus cabozantinib as second-line or third-line treatment of patients with EGFR wild-type advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ECOG-ACRIN 1512): a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov 4. [Epub ahead of print] link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  14. Spigel DR, Edelman MJ, O'Byrne K, Paz-Ares L, Mocci S, Phan S, Shames DS, Smith D, Yu W, Paton VE, Mok T. Results From the Phase III Randomized Trial of Onartuzumab Plus Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib in Previously Treated Stage IIIB or IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: METLung. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;35(4):412-420. Epub 2016 Dec 12. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Gefitinib (Iressa)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Kris et al. 2003 (IDEAL2) Randomized Phase II Gefitinib 500 mg/day Seems not superior
Kim et al. 2008 (INTEREST) Phase III Docetaxel Seems non-inferior
Mok et al. 2009 (IPASS) Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Superior PFS
Mitsudomi et al. 2009 (WJTOG3405) Phase III Cisplatin & Docetaxel Superior PFS
Maemondo et al. 2010 Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Superior PFS
Shi et al. 2013 (ICOGEN) Phase III Icotinib Seems non-inferior
Douillard, et al. 2014 Phase IV
Park et al. 2016 (LUX-Lung 7) Randomized Phase II Afatinib Seems to have inferior PFS
Urata et al. 2016 (WJOG 5108L) Phase III Erlotinib Inconclusive whether non-inferior
Cheng et al. 2016 Randomized Phase II P+G Seems to have inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

Given until progression of objective disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, Lynch TJ Jr, Prager D, Belani CP, Schiller JH, Kelly K, Spiridonidis H, Sandler A, Albain KS, Cella D, Wolf MK, Averbuch SD, Ochs JJ, Kay AC. Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2149-58. link to original article PubMed
  2. Kim ES, Hirsh V, Mok T, Socinski MA, Gervais R, Wu YL, Li LY, Watkins CL, Sellers MV, Lowe ES, Sun Y, Liao ML, Osterlind K, Reck M, Armour AA, Shepherd FA, Lippman SM, Douillard JY. Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2008 Nov 22;372(9652):1809-18. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y, Nishiwaki Y, Ohe Y, Yang JJ, Chewaskulyong B, Jiang H, Duffield EL, Watkins CL, Armour AA, Fukuoka M. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):947-57. Epub 2009 Aug 19. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, Seto T, Satouchi M, Tada H, Hirashima T, Asami K, Katakami N, Takada M, Yoshioka H, Shibata K, Kudoh S, Shimizu E, Saito H, Toyooka S, Nakagawa K, Fukuoka M; West Japan Oncology Group.. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Feb;11(2):121-8. Epub 2009 Dec 18. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed
  5. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, Gemma A, Harada M, Yoshizawa H, Kinoshita I, Fujita Y, Okinaga S, Hirano H, Yoshimori K, Harada T, Ogura T, Ando M, Miyazawa H, Tanaka T, Saijo Y, Hagiwara K, Morita S, Nukiwa T; North-East Japan Study Group. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2380-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  6. Shi Y, Zhang L, Liu X, Zhou C, Zhang L, Zhang S, Wang D, Li Q, Qin S, Hu C, Zhang Y, Chen J, Cheng Y, Feng J, Zhang H, Song Y, Wu YL, Xu N, Zhou J, Luo R, Bai C, Jin Y, Liu W, Wei Z, Tan F, Wang Y, Ding L, Dai H, Jiao S, Wang J, Liang L, Zhang W, Sun Y. Icotinib versus gefitinib in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ICOGEN): a randomised, double-blind phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):953-61. Epub 2013 Aug 13. link to original article PubMed
  7. Douillard JY, Ostoros G, Cobo M, Ciuleanu T, McCormack R, Webster A, Milenkova T. First-line gefitinib in Caucasian EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients: a phase-IV, open-label, single-arm study. Br J Cancer. 2014 Jan 7;110(1):55-62. link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
  8. Park K, Tan EH, O'Byrne K, Zhang L, Boyer M, Mok T, Hirsh V, Yang JC, Lee KH, Lu S, Shi Y, Kim SW, Laskin J, Kim DW, Arvis CD, Kölbeck K, Laurie SA, Tsai CM, Shahidi M, Kim M, Massey D, Zazulina V, Paz-Ares L. Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): a phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):577-89. Epub 2016 Apr 12. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  9. Urata Y, Katakami N, Morita S, Kaji R, Yoshioka H, Seto T, Satouchi M, Iwamoto Y, Kanehara M, Fujimoto D, Ikeda N, Murakami H, Daga H, Oguri T, Goto I, Imamura F, Sugawara S, Saka H, Nogami N, Negoro S, Nakagawa K, Nakanishi Y. Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Gefitinib With Erlotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: WJOG 5108L. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3248-57. Epub 2016 Mar 28. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  10. Cheng Y, Murakami H, Yang PC, He J, Nakagawa K, Kang JH, Kim JH, Wang X, Enatsu S, Puri T, Orlando M, Yang JC. Randomized Phase II Trial of Gefitinib With and Without Pemetrexed as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3258-66. Epub 2016 Aug 9. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Gemcitabine (Gemzar)

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Quoix et al. 2011 (IFCT-0501) Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Inferior OS

Study involved only patients 70 to 89 years old

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Growth factor support was not recommended as primary prophylaxis during cycle 1, but could be used if the patient develops grade 3 to 4 neutropenia

21-day cycle for up to 5 cycles

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Sederholm et al. 2005 Phase III Carboplatin & Gemcitabine Seems to have inferior OS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

Regimen #3

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Gridelli et al. 2003 (MILES) Phase III Gemcitabine & Vinorelbine Seems not superior
Vinorelbine Seems not superior

Study involved only patients at least 70 years old

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • "Antiemetic agents and other supportive treatments were provided at the discretion of the treating physician."

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

References

  1. Gridelli C, Perrone F, Gallo C, Cigolari S, Rossi A, Piantedosi F, Barbera S, Ferraù F, Piazza E, Rosetti F, Clerici M, Bertetto O, Robbiati SF, Frontini L, Sacco C, Castiglione F, Favaretto A, Novello S, Migliorino MR, Gasparini G, Galetta D, Iaffaioli RV, Gebbia V; MILES Investigators. Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Mar 5;95(5):362-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Sederholm C, Hillerdal G, Lamberg K, Kölbeck K, Dufmats M, Westberg R, Gawande SR. Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: the Swedish Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8380-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Quoix E, Zalcman G, Oster JP, Westeel V, Pichon E, Lavolé A, Dauba J, Debieuvre D, Souquet PJ, Bigay-Game L, Dansin E, Poudenx M, Molinier O, Vaylet F, Moro-Sibilot D, Herman D, Bennouna J, Tredaniel J, Ducoloné A, Lebitasy MP, Baudrin L, Laporte S, Milleron B; Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique. Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011 Sep 17;378(9796):1079-88. Epub 2011 Aug 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Gemcitabine & Vinorelbine

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Gridelli et al. 2003 (MILES) Phase III Gemcitabine Seems not superior
Vinorelbine Seems not superior

Study involved only patients at least 70 years old

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • "Antiemetic agents and other supportive treatments were provided at the discretion of the treating physician."

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

References

  1. Gridelli C, Perrone F, Gallo C, Cigolari S, Rossi A, Piantedosi F, Barbera S, Ferraù F, Piazza E, Rosetti F, Clerici M, Bertetto O, Robbiati SF, Frontini L, Sacco C, Castiglione F, Favaretto A, Novello S, Migliorino MR, Gasparini G, Galetta D, Iaffaioli RV, Gebbia V; MILES Investigators. Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Mar 5;95(5):362-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Osimertinib (Tagrisso)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Jänne et al. 2015 (AURA) Phase I
Mok et al. 2016 (AURA3) Phase III Carboplatin & Pemetrexed
Cisplatin & Pemetrexed
Superior PFS

Patients enrolled in AURA3 had locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with progression after first-line EGFR TKI therapy, and were required to have presence of an EGFR p.T790M mutation.

Chemotherapy

Given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Jänne PA, Yang JC, Kim DW, Planchard D, Ohe Y, Ramalingam SS, Ahn MJ, Kim SW, Su WC, Horn L, Haggstrom D, Felip E, Kim JH, Frewer P, Cantarini M, Brown KH, Dickinson PA, Ghiorghiu S, Ranson M. AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1689-99. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Mok TS, Wu YL, Ahn MJ, Garassino MC, Kim HR, Ramalingam SS, Shepherd FA, He Y, Akamatsu H, Theelen WS, Lee CK, Sebastian M, Templeton A, Mann H, Marotti M, Ghiorghiu S, Papadimitrakopoulou VA; AURA3 Investigators. Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640. Epub 2016 Dec 6. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Nivolumab (Opdivo)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence ORR Comparator Efficacy Pt Population
Rizvi et al. 2015 (CheckMate 063) Phase II 14% (95% CI 9 - 22) Chemo exposed
Brahmer et al. 2015 (CheckMate 017) Phase III 20% (95% CI 14 - 28) Docetaxel Superior OS Squamous only, chemo exposed
Borghaei et al. 2015 (CheckMate 057) Phase III 19% (95% CI 15 - 24) Docetaxel Superior OS Non-squamous only, chemo exposed

Immunotherapy

  • Nivolumab (Opdivo) 3 mg/kg IV once on day 1
    • Notably, on 9/13/16 the FDA recommended that dosing for this indication be changed to 240 mg with the same schedule based on updated pharmacokinetic data.

2-week cycles, given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Rizvi NA, Mazières J, Planchard D, Stinchcombe TE, Dy GK, Antonia SJ, Horn L, Lena H, Minenza E, Mennecier B, Otterson GA, Campos LT, Gandara DR, Levy BP, Nair SG, Zalcman G, Wolf J, Souquet PJ, Baldini E, Cappuzzo F, Chouaid C, Dowlati A, Sanborn R, Lopez-Chavez A, Grohe C, Huber RM, Harbison CT, Baudelet C, Lestini BJ, Ramalingam SS. Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): a phase 2, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb 19. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crinò L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, Antonia S, Pluzanski A, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Waterhouse D, Ready N, Gainor J, Arén Frontera O, Havel L, Steins M, Garassino MC, Aerts JG, Domine M, Paz-Ares L, Reck M, Baudelet C, Harbison CT, Lestini B, Spigel DR. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35. Epub 2015 May 31. link to original article PubMed
  3. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, Chow LQ, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhäufl M, Arrieta O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Lena H, Poddubskaya E, Gerber DE, Gettinger SN, Rudin CM, Rizvi N, Crinò L, Blumenschein GR Jr, Antonia SJ, Dorange C, Harbison CT, Graf Finckenstein F, Brahmer JR. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39. Epub 2015 Sep 27. link to original article PubMed

P+G

back to top

P+G: Pemetrexed, Gefitinib

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Cheng et al. 2016 Randomized Phase II Gefitinib Seems to have superior PFS

Chemotherapy

3-week cycles, given until progression of objective disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Cheng Y, Murakami H, Yang PC, He J, Nakagawa K, Kang JH, Kim JH, Wang X, Enatsu S, Puri T, Orlando M, Yang JC. Randomized Phase II Trial of Gefitinib With and Without Pemetrexed as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3258-66. Epub 2016 Aug 9. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Pembrolizumab (Keytruda)

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence ORR Comparator Efficacy Pt Population
Reck et al. 2016 (KEYNOTE-024) Phase III 44.8% (95% CI 36.8 - 53.0) Investigators' choice of 4-6 cycles of:

Carboplatin & Pemetrexed, Cisplatin & Pemetrexed, Carboplatin & Gemcitabine, Cisplatin & Gemcitabine, or Carboplatin & Paclitaxel

Superior OS First-line therapy, PD-L1 expressed on at least 50% of tumor cells, no EGFR/ALK mutations

Immunotherapy

21-day cycles for up to 35 cycles

Regimen #2

Study Evidence ORR Comparator Efficacy Pt Population
Herbst et al. 2015 (KEYNOTE-010) Phase II/III 2 mg/kg: 18% (95% CI 14 - 23)

10 mg/kg: 19% (95% CI 15 - 23)

Docetaxel Superior OS Chemo exposed

Immunotherapy

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, Leighl N, Balmanoukian AS, Eder JP, Patnaik A, Aggarwal C, Gubens M, Horn L, Carcereny E, Ahn MJ, Felip E, Lee JS, Hellmann MD, Hamid O, Goldman JW, Soria JC, Dolled-Filhart M, Rutledge RZ, Zhang J, Lunceford JK, Rangwala R, Lubiniecki GM, Roach C, Emancipator K, Gandhi L; KEYNOTE-001 Investigators. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2018-28. Epub 2015 Apr 19. link to original article PubMed
  2. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Pérez-Gracia JL, Han JY, Molina J, Kim JH, Arvis CD, Ahn MJ, Majem M, Fidler MJ, de Castro G Jr, Garrido M, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Im E, Dolled-Filhart M, Garon EB. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-50. Epub 2015 Dec 19. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  3. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, Gottfried M, Peled N, Tafreshi A, Cuffe S, O'Brien M, Rao S, Hotta K, Leiby MA, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Rangwala R, Brahmer JR; KEYNOTE-024 Investigators. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 8. link to original article link to supplementary appendix contains verified protocol PubMed

Pemetrexed (Alimta)

back to top

Example orders

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Hanna et al. 2004 Phase III Docetaxel Inconclusive whether non-inferior
Ardizzoni et al. 2012 (GOIRC 02-2006) Randomized Phase II Carboplatin & Pemetrexed Seems not superior
Shaw et al. 2013 Phase III Crizotinib Inferior PFS
Zukin et al. 2013 Phase III Carboplatin & Pemetrexed Inferior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • (per Ardizzoni et al. 2012):
  • Dexamethasone (Decadron) 4 mg or equivalent corticosteroid PO BID on the day before, the day of, and day after each dose of pemetrexed
  • Folic acid 350 to 600 mcg PO once per day, starting 1 to 2 weeks before the first dose of pemetrexed, to be taken throughout pemetrexed therapy.
    • Hanna et al. 2004 used folic acid 1 mg PO once per day
  • Cyanocobalamin (Vitamin B12) 1000 mcg IM once every 9 weeks, first dose 1 to 2 weeks before the first dose of pemetrexed, to be given throughout pemetrexed therapy

21-day cycles

Ardizzoni et al. 2012 & Zukin et al. 2013 treated patients for up to 4 cycles or until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal.

References

  1. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Pereira JR, De Marinis F, von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Tsao TC, Pless M, Muller T, Lim HL, Desch C, Szondy K, Gervais R, Shaharyar, Manegold C, Paul S, Paoletti P, Einhorn L, Bunn PA Jr. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1589-97. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Ardizzoni A, Tiseo M, Boni L, Vincent AD, Passalacqua R, Buti S, Amoroso D, Camerini A, Labianca R, Genestreti G, Boni C, Ciuffreda L, Di Costanzo F, de Marinis F, Crinò L, Santo A, Pazzola A, Barbieri F, Zilembo N, Colantonio I, Tibaldi C, Mattioli R, Cafferata MA, Camisa R, Smit EF. Pemetrexed versus pemetrexed and carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the GOIRC 02-2006 randomized phase II study and pooled analysis with the NVALT7 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):4501-7. Epub 2012 Oct 29. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K, Seto T, Crinó L, Ahn MJ, De Pas T, Besse B, Solomon BJ, Blackhall F, Wu YL, Thomas M, O'Byrne KJ, Moro-Sibilot D, Camidge DR, Mok T, Hirsh V, Riely GJ, Iyer S, Tassell V, Polli A, Wilner KD, Jänne PA. Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20;368(25):2385-94. Epub 2013 Jun 1. link to original article link to supplementary appendix contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Zukin M, Barrios CH, Rodrigues Pereira J, De Albuquerque Ribeiro R, de Mendonça Beato CA, do Nascimento YN, Murad A, Franke FA, Precivale M, de Lima Araujo LH, Da Rocha Baldotto CS, Vieira FM, Small IA, Ferreira CG, Lilenbaum RC. Randomized Phase III Trial of Single-Agent Pemetrexed Versus Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 2. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2849-53. Epub 2013 Jun 17. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Placebo (Observation)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group, 1999 Phase III Vinorelbine Seems to have inferior OS
Shepherd et al. 2005 (NCIC CTG BR.21) Phase III Erlotinib Inferior OS
Miller et al. 2012 (LUX-Lung 1) Phase III Afatinib Inferior PFS
Paz-Ares et al. 2015 (MISSION) Phase III Sorafenib Inferior PFS

No active antineoplastic treatment. Placed here because one or more randomized clinical trials included a placebo or observation arm in this disease context.

References

  1. The Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group. Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Jan 6;91(1):66-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Campos D, Maoleekoonpiroj S, Smylie M, Martins R, van Kooten M, Dediu M, Findlay B, Tu D, Johnston D, Bezjak A, Clark G, Santabárbara P, Seymour L; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  3. Miller VA, Hirsh V, Cadranel J, Chen YM, Park K, Kim SW, Zhou C, Su WC, Wang M, Sun Y, Heo DS, Crino L, Tan EH, Chao TY, Shahidi M, Cong XJ, Lorence RM, Yang JC. Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):528-38. Epub 2012 Mar 26. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Paz-Ares L, Hirsh V, Zhang L, de Marinis F, Yang JC, Wakelee HA, Seto T, Wu YL, Novello S, Juhász E, Arén O, Sun Y, Schmelter T, Ong TJ, Peña C, Smit EF, Mok TS. Monotherapy Administration of Sorafenib in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MISSION) Trial: A Phase III, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sorafenib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Predominantly Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after 2 or 3 Previous Treatment Regimens. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Dec;10(12):1745-53. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed

Placebo (Observation)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Paz-Ares et al. 2015 (MISSION) Phase III Placebo Superior PFS

Note: although the primary endpoint (OS) was negative overall, the authors note that the subgroup of patients with known EGFR mutations treated with sorafenib had significantly superior survival (p=0.002).

Chemotherapy

Continued until progression

References

  1. Paz-Ares L, Hirsh V, Zhang L, de Marinis F, Yang JC, Wakelee HA, Seto T, Wu YL, Novello S, Juhász E, Arén O, Sun Y, Schmelter T, Ong TJ, Peña C, Smit EF, Mok TS. Monotherapy Administration of Sorafenib in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MISSION) Trial: A Phase III, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sorafenib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Predominantly Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after 2 or 3 Previous Treatment Regimens. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Dec;10(12):1745-53. link to SD article contains verified protocol PubMed

Vinorelbine (Navelbine)

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Quoix et al. 2011 (IFCT-0501) Phase III Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Inferior OS

Study involved only patients 70 to 89 years old

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Growth factor support was not recommended as primary prophylaxis during cycle 1, but could be used if the patient develops grade 3 to 4 neutropenia

21-day cycle for up to 5 cycles

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group, 1999 Phase III Supportive care Seems to have superior OS
Gridelli et al. 2003 (MILES) Phase III Gemcitabine Seems not superior
Gemcitabine & Vinorelbine Seems not superior

Study involved only patients at least 70 years old

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • (varies depending on reference):
  • Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group, 1999: Metoclopramide (Reglan) 20 mg IV bolus prior to Vinorelbine (Navelbine)
  • Gridelli et al. 2003: "Antiemetic agents and other supportive treatments were provided at the discretion of the treating physician."

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Regimen #3

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Jassem et al. 2001 Randomized Phase II Oral vinorelbine Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Patients who had either grade 4 neutropenia lasting at least 5 days or both fever and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia could receive G-CSF (dose/schedule/duration not specified)
  • Metoclopramide (Reglan) (dose/schedule/route not specified) used first for nausea
  • Nausea despite metoclopramide was treated with a 5-HT3 antagonist such as Ondansetron (Zofran) or Granisetron (Kytril) (dose/schedule/route not specified) prn nausea

Continued until progression

Regimen #4

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Jassem et al. 2001 Randomized Phase II Intravenous vinorelbine Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

  • Vinorelbine (Navelbine) 60 mg/m2 PO once per week, increased to 80 mg/m2 PO once per week with 4th dose, if no severe neutropenia

Supportive medications

  • Patients who had either grade 4 neutropenia lasting at least 5 days or both fever and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia could receive G-CSF (dose/schedule/duration not specified)
  • Metoclopramide (Reglan) (dose/schedule/route not specified) used first for nausea
  • Nausea despite metoclopramide was treated with a 5-HT3 antagonist such as Ondansetron (Zofran) or Granisetron (Kytril) (dose/schedule/route not specified) prn nausea

Continued until progression

References

  1. The Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group. Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Jan 6;91(1):66-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Jassem J, Ramlau R, Karnicka-Mlodkowska H, Krawczyk K, Krzakowski M, Zatloukal P, Lemarié E, Hartmann W, Novakova L, O'Brien M, Depierr A. A multicenter randomized phase II study of oral vs. intravenous vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2001 Oct;12(10):1375-81. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Gridelli C, Perrone F, Gallo C, Cigolari S, Rossi A, Piantedosi F, Barbera S, Ferraù F, Piazza E, Rosetti F, Clerici M, Bertetto O, Robbiati SF, Frontini L, Sacco C, Castiglione F, Favaretto A, Novello S, Migliorino MR, Gasparini G, Galetta D, Iaffaioli RV, Gebbia V; MILES Investigators. Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Mar 5;95(5):362-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Quoix E, Zalcman G, Oster JP, Westeel V, Pichon E, Lavolé A, Dauba J, Debieuvre D, Souquet PJ, Bigay-Game L, Dansin E, Poudenx M, Molinier O, Vaylet F, Moro-Sibilot D, Herman D, Bennouna J, Tredaniel J, Ducoloné A, Lebitasy MP, Baudrin L, Laporte S, Milleron B; Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique. Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011 Sep 17;378(9796):1079-88. Epub 2011 Aug 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Maintenance

Bevacizumab (Avastin)

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Barlesi et al. 2013 (AVAPERL (MO22089)) Phase III Bevacizumab & Pemetrexed maintenance Inferior PFS

Treatment preceded by cisplatin, pemetrexed, bevacizumab x 4.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

Regimen #2

Study Evidence
Sandler et al. 2006 (ECOG 4599) Non-randomized portion of RCT
Patel et al. 2013 (PointBreak) Non-randomized portion of RCT

Treatment in ECOG 4599 preceded by PacCBev x 6. Treatment in PointBreak preceded by PacCBev x 4.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, Lilenbaum R, Johnson DH. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2542-50. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Subset analysis: Ramalingam SS, Dahlberg SE, Langer CJ, Gray R, Belani CP, Brahmer JR, Sandler AB, Schiller JH, Johnson DH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Outcomes for elderly, advanced-stage non small-cell lung cancer patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel: analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):60-5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Barlesi F, Scherpereel A, Rittmeyer A, Pazzola A, Ferrer Tur N, Kim JH, Ahn MJ, Aerts JG, Gorbunova V, Vikström A, Wong EK, Perez-Moreno P, Mitchell L, Groen HJ. Randomized Phase III Trial of Maintenance Bevacizumab With or Without Pemetrexed After First-Line Induction With Bevacizumab, Cisplatin, and Pemetrexed in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: AVAPERL (MO22089). J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 20;31(24):3004-11. Epub 2013 Jul 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Patel JD, Socinski MA, Garon EB, Reynolds CH, Spigel DR, Olsen MR, Hermann RC, Jotte RM, Beck T, Richards DA, Guba SC, Liu J, Frimodt-Moller B, John WJ, Obasaju CK, Pennella EJ, Bonomi P, Govindan R. PointBreak: a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 1;31(34):4349-57. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Bevacizumab & Pemetrexed

back to top

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Barlesi et al. 2013 (AVAPERL (MO22089)) Phase III Bevacizumab maintenance Superior PFS

Treatment preceded by cisplatin, pemetrexed, bevacizumab x 4.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

Regimen #2

Study Evidence
Patel et al. 2013 (PointBreak) Non-randomized portion of RCT

Treatment preceded by PemCBev x 4.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Premedications, folic acid, and vitamin supplementation per pemetrexed label
  • Erythropoietic agents or granulocyte colony-stimulating factors allowed per ASCO & NCCN guidelines

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Barlesi F, Scherpereel A, Rittmeyer A, Pazzola A, Ferrer Tur N, Kim JH, Ahn MJ, Aerts JG, Gorbunova V, Vikström A, Wong EK, Perez-Moreno P, Mitchell L, Groen HJ. Randomized Phase III Trial of Maintenance Bevacizumab With or Without Pemetrexed After First-Line Induction With Bevacizumab, Cisplatin, and Pemetrexed in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: AVAPERL (MO22089). J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 20;31(24):3004-11. Epub 2013 Jul 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Patel JD, Socinski MA, Garon EB, Reynolds CH, Spigel DR, Olsen MR, Hermann RC, Jotte RM, Beck T, Richards DA, Guba SC, Liu J, Frimodt-Moller B, John WJ, Obasaju CK, Pennella EJ, Bonomi P, Govindan R. PointBreak: a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 1;31(34):4349-57. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Ipilimumab (Yervoy)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Lynch et al. 2012 Non-randomized portion of RCT

Treatment preceded by carboplatin, paclitaxel, ipilimumab x 6.

Immunotherapy

12-week cycles, given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Lynch TJ, Bondarenko I, Luft A, Serwatowski P, Barlesi F, Chacko R, Sebastian M, Neal J, Lu H, Cuillerot JM, Reck M. Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2046-54. Epub 2012 Apr 30. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Necitumumab (Portrazza)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Thatcher et al. 2015 (SQUIRE) Non-randomized portion of RCT

Patients had stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer; treatment preceded by Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, Necitumumab x 6.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Thatcher N, Hirsch FR, Luft AV, Szczesna A, Ciuleanu TE, Dediu M, Ramlau R, Galiulin RK, Bálint B, Losonczy G, Kazarnowicz A, Park K, Schumann C, Reck M, Depenbrock H, Nanda S, Kruljac-Letunic A, Kurek R, Paz-Ares L, Socinski MA; SQUIRE Investigators. Necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin alone as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SQUIRE): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):763-74. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Pembrolizumab & Pemetrexed

Pembrolizumab & Pemetrexed maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed (Alimta)

back to top

Example orders

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Paz-Ares et al. 2012 (PARAMOUNT) Phase III Placebo Superior PFS
Langer et al. 2016 (KEYNOTE-021) Non-randomized portion of RCT

Treatment in PARAMOUNT preceded by cisplatin & pemetrexed x 4; maintenance therapy started 21 to 42 days after cycle 4 day 1 of induction chemotherapy. Treatment in KEYNOTE-021 preceded by carboplatin & pemetrexed x 4 versus carboplatin, pemetrexed, pembrolizumab x 4.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Folic acid, Cyanocobalamin (Vitamin B12), prophylactic Dexamethasone (Decadron)
  • "Investigators followed current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines for use of colony-stimulating factors and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents."

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or physician/patient choice

References

  1. Paz-Ares L, de Marinis F, Dediu M, Thomas M, Pujol JL, Bidoli P, Molinier O, Sahoo TP, Laack E, Reck M, Corral J, Melemed S, John W, Chouaki N, Zimmermann AH, Visseren-Grul C, Gridelli C. Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):247-55. Epub 2012 Feb 16. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Paz-Ares LG, de Marinis F, Dediu M, Thomas M, Pujol JL, Bidoli P, Molinier O, Sahoo TP, Laack E, Reck M, Corral J, Melemed S, John W, Chouaki N, Zimmermann AH, Visseren-Grul C, Gridelli C. PARAMOUNT: Final Overall Survival Results of the Phase III Study of Maintenance Pemetrexed Versus Placebo Immediately After Induction Treatment With Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2895-902. Epub 2013 Jul 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Langer CJ, Gadgeel SM, Borghaei H, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Patnaik A, Powell SF, Gentzler RD, Martins RG, Stevenson JP, Jalal SI, Panwalkar A, Yang JC, Gubens M, Sequist LV, Awad MM, Fiore J, Ge Y, Raftopoulos H, Gandhi L; KEYNOTE-021 investigators.. Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for advanced, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct 10. [Epub ahead of print] link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Placebo (Observation)

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Paz-Ares et al. 2012 (PARAMOUNT) Phase III Pemetrexed Inferior PFS

Preceded by 4 cycles of induction therapy with cisplatin & pemetrexed. No further active treatment.

References

  1. Paz-Ares L, de Marinis F, Dediu M, Thomas M, Pujol JL, Bidoli P, Molinier O, Sahoo TP, Laack E, Reck M, Corral J, Melemed S, John W, Chouaki N, Zimmermann AH, Visseren-Grul C, Gridelli C. Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):247-55. Epub 2012 Feb 16. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Paz-Ares LG, de Marinis F, Dediu M, Thomas M, Pujol JL, Bidoli P, Molinier O, Sahoo TP, Laack E, Reck M, Corral J, Melemed S, John W, Chouaki N, Zimmermann AH, Visseren-Grul C, Gridelli C. PARAMOUNT: Final Overall Survival Results of the Phase III Study of Maintenance Pemetrexed Versus Placebo Immediately After Induction Treatment With Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2895-902. Epub 2013 Jul 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed