Difference between revisions of "Small cell lung cancer"

From HemOnc.org - A Hematology Oncology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Carboplatin & Etoposide  : corrected from 100 to 80.)
Tag: visualeditor
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:50%;"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:50%;"
!colspan="2" align="center" style="color:white; font-size:125%; background-color:#08519c"|'''Section editor'''
+
! colspan="2" align="center" style="color:white; font-size:125%; background-color:#08519c" |'''Section editor'''
 
|-
 
|-
|style="background-color:#F0F0F0"|[[File:TravisOsterman.jpg|frameless|upright=0.3|center]]
+
| style="background-color:#F0F0F0" |[[File:TravisOsterman.jpg|frameless|upright=0.3|center]]
 
|<big>[[User:Travisosterman|Travis Osterman, DO, MS]]<br>Nashville, TN</big><br>Twitter: [https://twitter.com/TravisOsterman TravisOsterman]<br>[https://www.linkedin.com/in/travis-osterman-1850b236/ LinkedIn]
 
|<big>[[User:Travisosterman|Travis Osterman, DO, MS]]<br>Nashville, TN</big><br>Twitter: [https://twitter.com/TravisOsterman TravisOsterman]<br>[https://www.linkedin.com/in/travis-osterman-1850b236/ LinkedIn]
 
|-
 
|-
Line 31: Line 31:
 
===Variant #1, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:89f0ef|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:89f0ef|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jnci/djp200 Lee et al. 2009]
 
|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jnci/djp200 Lee et al. 2009]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide, then RT
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide, then RT
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 52: Line 52:
 
===Variant #2, 1 day of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:3cbc9f|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, 1 day of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:3cbc9f|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jnci/djp200 Lee et al. 2009]
 
|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jnci/djp200 Lee et al. 2009]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide, then RT
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide, then RT
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 82: Line 82:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:dd9b40|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:dd9b40|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJM199312163292504 Arriagada et al. 1993]
 
|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJM199312163292504 Arriagada et al. 1993]
Line 112: Line 112:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:dd9b40|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:dd9b40|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/3/11/1471.long Evans et al. 1985]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/3/11/1471.long Evans et al. 1985]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 146: Line 146:
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:9e4385|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:9e4385|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/9/1231.long Skarlos et al. 2001]
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/9/1231.long Skarlos et al. 2001]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (E)
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, early HTRT
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, early HTRT
|style="background-color:#d9ef8b"|Might have superior ORR
+
| style="background-color:#d9ef8b" |Might have superior ORR
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 168: Line 168:
 
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:bb6fc|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:bb6fc|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/11/3540.long Okamoto et al. 1999]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/11/3540.long Okamoto et al. 1999]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 202: Line 202:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:88c1d9|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:88c1d9|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Cisplatin.2C_Etoposide.2C_RT|Cisplatin, Etoposide, RT]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin.2C_Etoposide.2C_RT|Cisplatin, Etoposide, RT]]
|style="background-color:#d73027"|Inferior OS
+
| style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 232: Line 232:
 
===Variant #1, 60/360 {{#subobject:63584c|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, 60/360 {{#subobject:63584c|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199901283400403 Turrisi et al. 1999 (Intergroup 0096)]
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199901283400403 Turrisi et al. 1999 (Intergroup 0096)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, once per day RT
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, once per day RT
|style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 254: Line 254:
 
===Variant #2, 75 with partially oral etoposide {{#subobject:b5305|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, 75 with partially oral etoposide {{#subobject:b5305|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#CEV_.26_RT|CEV & RT]]
 
|[[#CEV_.26_RT|CEV & RT]]
|style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 279: Line 279:
 
===Variant #3, 75/300 {{#subobject:7ed43e|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #3, 75/300 {{#subobject:7ed43e|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555437/ Faivre-Finn et al. 2017 (CONVERT)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555437/ Faivre-Finn et al. 2017 (CONVERT)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, once per day RT
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, once per day RT
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 299: Line 299:
 
===Variant #4, 75/300, split doses of cisplatin {{#subobject:c54e7b|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #4, 75/300, split doses of cisplatin {{#subobject:c54e7b|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555437/ Faivre-Finn et al. 2017 (CONVERT)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555437/ Faivre-Finn et al. 2017 (CONVERT)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, once per day RT
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, once per day RT
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 319: Line 319:
 
===Variant #5, 80/300 x 1 {{#subobject:6426d9|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #5, 80/300 x 1 {{#subobject:6426d9|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/33/5247.full Saito et al. 2006 (WJTOG 9902)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/33/5247.full Saito et al. 2006 (WJTOG 9902)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 337: Line 337:
 
===Variant #6, 80/300 x 4 {{#subobject:77843f|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #6, 80/300 x 4 {{#subobject:77843f|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/14/3054.long Takada et al. 2002 (JCOG 9104)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/14/3054.long Takada et al. 2002 (JCOG 9104)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, sequential RT
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, sequential RT
|style="background-color:#d9ef8b"|Might have superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#d9ef8b" |Might have superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 373: Line 373:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:540b9f|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:540b9f|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/33/5247.full Saito et al. 2006 (WJTOG 9902)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/33/5247.full Saito et al. 2006 (WJTOG 9902)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 403: Line 403:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:c48aca|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:c48aca|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/3/11/1471.long Evans et al. 1985]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/3/11/1471.long Evans et al. 1985]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 426: Line 426:
 
===Variant #1, 20 Gy {{#subobject:900486|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, 20 Gy {{#subobject:900486|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/373562 Cox et al. 1981]
 
|[https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/373562 Cox et al. 1981]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/3/11/1471.long Evans et al. 1985]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/3/11/1471.long Evans et al. 1985]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/9/1231.long Skarlos et al. 2001]
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/9/1231.long Skarlos et al. 2001]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 450: Line 450:
 
===Variant #2, 24 Gy {{#subobject:5b88f0|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, 24 Gy {{#subobject:5b88f0|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/14/3054.long Takada et al. 2002 (JCOG 9104)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/14/3054.long Takada et al. 2002 (JCOG 9104)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 464: Line 464:
 
===Variant #3, 25 Gy {{#subobject:1475db|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #3, 25 Gy {{#subobject:1475db|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199901283400403 Turrisi et al. 1999 (Intergroup 0096)]
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199901283400403 Turrisi et al. 1999 (Intergroup 0096)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
 
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
 
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
 
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
 
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/33/5247.full Saito et al. 2006 (WJTOG 9902)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/33/5247.full Saito et al. 2006 (WJTOG 9902)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
 
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
 
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
 
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
Line 493: Line 493:
 
===Variant #4, 30 Gy {{#subobject:63970e|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #4, 30 Gy {{#subobject:63970e|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 525: Line 525:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:949381|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:949381|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/1097-0142%2819850701%2956%3A1%3C71%3A%3AAID-CNCR2820560112%3E3.0.CO%3B2-9 Klastersky et al. 1985]
 
|[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/1097-0142%2819850701%2956%3A1%3C71%3A%3AAID-CNCR2820560112%3E3.0.CO%3B2-9 Klastersky et al. 1985]
Line 565: Line 565:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:949381|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:949381|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002146/ Oh et al. 2016 (COMBAT)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002146/ Oh et al. 2016 (COMBAT)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|EP 60/100]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|EP 60/100]]
|style="background-color:#eeee01"|Non-inferior RR
+
| style="background-color:#eeee01" |Non-inferior RR
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 596: Line 596:
 
===Variant #1, AUC 5/80 {{#subobject:471848|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, AUC 5/80 {{#subobject:471848|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.clinical-lung-cancer.com/article/S1525-7304(13)00232-5/fulltext Sekine et al. 2013]
 
|[https://www.clinical-lung-cancer.com/article/S1525-7304(13)00232-5/fulltext Sekine et al. 2013]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Amrubicin
 
|Amrubicin
 
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
Line 609: Line 609:
 
====Chemotherapy====
 
====Chemotherapy====
 
*[[Carboplatin (Paraplatin)]] AUC 5 IV once on day 1
 
*[[Carboplatin (Paraplatin)]] AUC 5 IV once on day 1
*[[Etoposide (Vepesid)]] 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> IV once per day on days 1 to 3
+
*[[Etoposide (Vepesid)]] 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> IV once per day on days 1 to 3
  
 
'''21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles'''
 
'''21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles'''
Line 615: Line 615:
 
===Variant #2, AUC 5/100 {{#subobject:1eba05|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, AUC 5/100 {{#subobject:1eba05|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/28/4787.long Socinski et al. 2009]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/28/4787.long Socinski et al. 2009]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Carboplatin & Pemetrexed
 
|Carboplatin & Pemetrexed
|style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (C)
 
|[[#Carboplatin.2C_Etoposide.2C_Bevacizumab|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Bevacizumab]]
 
|[[#Carboplatin.2C_Etoposide.2C_Bevacizumab|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Bevacizumab]]
|style="background-color:#fc8d59"|Seems to have inferior PFS
+
| style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior PFS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429175/ Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429175/ Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
|style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|
+
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
|style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|
+
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.7454 Jalal et al. 2017 (MATISSE)]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.7454 Jalal et al. 2017 (MATISSE)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (C)
 
|PaCE
 
|PaCE
|style="background-color:#d9ef8b"|Might have superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#d9ef8b" |Might have superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 654: Line 654:
 
===Variant #3, AUC 5 or 6/120 {{#subobject:927150|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #3, AUC 5 or 6/120 {{#subobject:927150|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 674: Line 674:
 
===Variant #4, AUC 5 or 6/120, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:ae04e8|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #4, AUC 5 or 6/120, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:ae04e8|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jnci/djp200 Lee et al. 2009]
 
|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jnci/djp200 Lee et al. 2009]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 700: Line 700:
 
===Variant #5, AUC 5 or 6/120, 1 day of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:47c27e|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #5, AUC 5 or 6/120, 1 day of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:47c27e|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jnci/djp200 Lee et al. 2009]
 
|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jnci/djp200 Lee et al. 2009]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide  
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide  
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
 
|Carboplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 726: Line 726:
 
===Variant #6, AUC 5/140 {{#subobject:69fffb|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #6, AUC 5/140 {{#subobject:69fffb|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/4/663.long Schmittel et al. 2006]
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/4/663.long Schmittel et al. 2006]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (E)
 
|[[#Carboplatin_.26_Irinotecan|IP]]
 
|[[#Carboplatin_.26_Irinotecan|IP]]
|style="background-color:#fee08b"|Might have inferior OS
+
| style="background-color:#fee08b" |Might have inferior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 749: Line 749:
 
===Variant #7, AUC 5/100, 28-day cycles {{#subobject:d904aa|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #7, AUC 5/100, 28-day cycles {{#subobject:d904aa|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/11/3540.long Okamoto et al. 1999]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/11/3540.long Okamoto et al. 1999]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/7/957.long Quoix et al. 2001]
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/7/957.long Quoix et al. 2001]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 794: Line 794:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:3eed0d|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:3eed0d|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (E)
 
|[[#Carboplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Carboplatin & Etoposide]]
 
|[[#Carboplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Carboplatin & Etoposide]]
|style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior PFS
+
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior PFS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 826: Line 826:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:38a7ba|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:38a7ba|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/4/663.long Schmittel et al. 2006]
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/4/663.long Schmittel et al. 2006]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (E)
 
|[[#Carboplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|EP]]
 
|[[#Carboplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|EP]]
|style="background-color:#d9ef8b"|Might have superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#d9ef8b" |Might have superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 858: Line 858:
 
===Variant #1, phased ipilimumab {{#subobject:7dbd39|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, phased ipilimumab {{#subobject:7dbd39|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
|rowspan="2"|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/75.long Reck et al. 2011]
+
| rowspan="2" |[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/75.long Reck et al. 2011]
|rowspan="2" style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (E)
+
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (E)
 
|Carboplatin & Paclitaxel
 
|Carboplatin & Paclitaxel
|style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior irPFS
+
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior irPFS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, concurrent Ipilimumab
 
|Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, concurrent Ipilimumab
|style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|Not reported
+
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 885: Line 885:
 
===Variant #2, concurrent ipilimumab {{#subobject:069d62|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, concurrent ipilimumab {{#subobject:069d62|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
|rowspan="2"|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/75.long Reck et al. 2011]
+
| rowspan="2" |[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/75.long Reck et al. 2011]
|rowspan="2" style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (E)
+
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (E)
 
|Carboplatin & Paclitaxel
 
|Carboplatin & Paclitaxel
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, phased Ipilimumab
 
|Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, phased Ipilimumab
|style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|Not reported
+
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 921: Line 921:
 
===Variant #1, flat-dose vincristine {{#subobject:3dc31b|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, flat-dose vincristine {{#subobject:3dc31b|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 20%"|Study
+
! style="width: 20%" |Study
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 20%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 20%" |Comparator
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://annals.org/aim/article-abstract/702180/superiority-alternating-non-cross-resistant-chemotherapy-extensive-small-cell-lung?doi=10.7326%2f0003-4819-107-4-451 Evans et al. 1987]
 
|[http://annals.org/aim/article-abstract/702180/superiority-alternating-non-cross-resistant-chemotherapy-extensive-small-cell-lung?doi=10.7326%2f0003-4819-107-4-451 Evans et al. 1987]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|CAV/PE
 
|CAV/PE
 
| style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior OS
 
| style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior OS
| style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Similar toxicity
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Similar toxicity
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 943: Line 943:
 
===Variant #2, uncapped vincristine {{#subobject:d8e9d5|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, uncapped vincristine {{#subobject:d8e9d5|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 20%"|Study
+
! style="width: 20%" |Study
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 20%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 20%" |Comparator
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(96)02005-3/fulltext Girling 1996]
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(96)02005-3/fulltext Girling 1996]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Oral Etoposide
 
|Oral Etoposide
 
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior OS
 
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior OS
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|rowspan=2|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
+
| rowspan="2" |[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
|rowspan=2 style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Ifosfamide_monotherapy|Ifosfamide]]
 
|[[#Ifosfamide_monotherapy|Ifosfamide]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
|style="background-color:#d73027"|More toxic
+
| style="background-color:#d73027" |More toxic
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[[#Teniposide_monotherapy|Teniposide]]
 
|[[#Teniposide_monotherapy|Teniposide]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
|style="background-color:#d73027"|More toxic
+
| style="background-color:#d73027" |More toxic
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 989: Line 989:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:be62e9|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:be62e9|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ejcancer.com/article/0959-8049(96)00145-1/pdf Postmus et al. 1996]
 
|[https://www.ejcancer.com/article/0959-8049(96)00145-1/pdf Postmus et al. 1996]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|CDE/VIMP
 
|CDE/VIMP
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,018: Line 1,018:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:e4488b|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:e4488b|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,047: Line 1,047:
 
===Variant #1, 60/100 {{#subobject:dd1718|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, 60/100 {{#subobject:dd1718|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002146/ Oh et al. 2016 (COMBAT)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002146/ Oh et al. 2016 (COMBAT)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Belotecan_.26_Cisplatin|BP]]
 
|[[#Belotecan_.26_Cisplatin|BP]]
|style="background-color:#eeee01"|Non-inferior RR
+
| style="background-color:#eeee01" |Non-inferior RR
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,067: Line 1,067:
 
===Variant #2, 60/120 {{#subobject:5c4b41|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, 60/120 {{#subobject:5c4b41|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/13/2038.long Hanna et al. 2006]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/13/2038.long Hanna et al. 2006]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Irinotecan_2|Cisplatin & Irinotecan]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Irinotecan_2|Cisplatin & Irinotecan]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,096: Line 1,096:
 
===Variant #3, 60/120, 1 day of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:47c27e|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #3, 60/120, 1 day of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:47c27e|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,115: Line 1,115:
 
===Variant #4, 60/120, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:ae04e8|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #4, 60/120, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:ae04e8|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455702/ Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
 
|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,134: Line 1,134:
 
===Variant #5, 75/100 {{#subobject:da2da4|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #5, 75/100 {{#subobject:da2da4|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (C)
 
|[[#Cisplatin.2C_Etoposide.2C_Bevacizumab|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Bevacizumab]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin.2C_Etoposide.2C_Bevacizumab|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Bevacizumab]]
|style="background-color:#fc8d59"|Seems to have inferior PFS
+
| style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior PFS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,153: Line 1,153:
 
===Variant #6, 75/100, 3 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:807314|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #6, 75/100, 3 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:807314|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/20/24/4665.long Sundstrøm et al. 2002]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#CEV_2|CEV]]
 
|[[#CEV_2|CEV]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,176: Line 1,176:
 
===Variant #7, 75/100, cisplatin split over 3 days {{#subobject:a51a22|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #7, 75/100, cisplatin split over 3 days {{#subobject:a51a22|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/3/11/1471.long Evans et al. 1985]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/3/11/1471.long Evans et al. 1985]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,199: Line 1,199:
 
===Variant #8, 80/80 {{#subobject:7b3c2e|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #8, 80/80 {{#subobject:7b3c2e|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/12/10/2022.long Ihde et al. 1994]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/12/10/2022.long Ihde et al. 1994]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|High-dose EP
 
|High-dose EP
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2005.09.071 Niell et al. 2005 (CALGB 9732)]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2005.09.071 Niell et al. 2005 (CALGB 9732)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|PET
 
|PET
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,232: Line 1,232:
 
===Variant #9, 80/100 {{#subobject:26b7f1|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #9, 80/100 {{#subobject:26b7f1|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
|rowspan=2|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-abstract/83/12/855/956642 Fukuoka et al. 1991]
+
| rowspan="2" |[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-abstract/83/12/855/956642 Fukuoka et al. 1991]
|rowspan=2 style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#CAV|CAV]]
 
|[[#CAV|CAV]]
|style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|Not reported
+
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported
 
|-
 
|-
 
|CAV/PE
 
|CAV/PE
Line 1,246: Line 1,246:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa003034 Noda et al. 2002]
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa003034 Noda et al. 2002]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Irinotecan_2|Cisplatin & Irinotecan]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Irinotecan_2|Cisplatin & Irinotecan]]
|style="background-color:#d73027"|Inferior OS
+
| style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429175/ Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429175/ Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
|style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|
+
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
|style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|
+
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826513/ Sun et al. 2016]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826513/ Sun et al. 2016]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|AP
 
|AP
|style="background-color:#fee08b"|Might have inferior OS
+
| style="background-color:#fee08b" |Might have inferior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,274: Line 1,274:
 
===Variant #10, 80/100, cisplatin split over 4 days {{#subobject:d389d3|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #10, 80/100, cisplatin split over 4 days {{#subobject:d389d3|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.1995.13.10.2594 Loehrer et al. 1995]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.1995.13.10.2594 Loehrer et al. 1995]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#VIP|VIP]]
 
|[[#VIP|VIP]]
|style="background-color:#fc8d59"|Seems to have inferior OS
+
| style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,293: Line 1,293:
 
===Variant #11, 80/120, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:998892|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #11, 80/120, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle {{#subobject:998892|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527803/ Baka et al. 2008]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527803/ Baka et al. 2008]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#ACE|ACE]]
 
|[[#ACE|ACE]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,312: Line 1,312:
 
===Variant #12, 100/400 {{#subobject:f8e87a|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #12, 100/400 {{#subobject:f8e87a|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.1992.10.2.282 Roth et al. 1992]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.1992.10.2.282 Roth et al. 1992]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#CAV|CAV]]<br> CAV/PE
 
|[[#CAV|CAV]]<br> CAV/PE
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,354: Line 1,354:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:3f85eb|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:3f85eb|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (E)
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
|style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior PFS
+
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior PFS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,386: Line 1,386:
 
===Variant #1, 30/65 {{#subobject:dc3fe1|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, 30/65 {{#subobject:dc3fe1|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/13/2038.long Hanna et al. 2006]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/13/2038.long Hanna et al. 2006]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,409: Line 1,409:
 
===Variant #2, 60/60 {{#subobject:c0be38|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, 60/60 {{#subobject:c0be38|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa003034 Noda et al. 2002]
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa003034 Noda et al. 2002]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
|style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5153 Satouchi et al. 2014 (JCOG 0509)]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5153 Satouchi et al. 2014 (JCOG 0509)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Amrubicin & Cisplatin
 
|Amrubicin & Cisplatin
|style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,448: Line 1,448:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:57c4cc|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:57c4cc|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10439170 Hesketh et al. 1999]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10439170 Hesketh et al. 1999]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,470: Line 1,470:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:3276f5|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:3276f5|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 20%"|Study
+
! style="width: 20%" |Study
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 20%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 20%" |Comparator
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]]
 
|-
 
|-
|rowspan=2|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
+
| rowspan="2" |[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
|rowspan=2 style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#CAV|CAV]]
 
|[[#CAV|CAV]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Less toxic
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Less toxic
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[[#Teniposide_monotherapy|Teniposide]]
 
|[[#Teniposide_monotherapy|Teniposide]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
|style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|Not reported
+
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,508: Line 1,508:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:964e45|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:964e45|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 20%"|Study
+
! style="width: 20%" |Study
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 20%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 20%" |Comparator
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]]
+
! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]]
 
|-
 
|-
|rowspan=2|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
+
| rowspan="2" |[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
|rowspan=2 style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#CAV|CAV]]
 
|[[#CAV|CAV]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Less toxic
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Less toxic
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[[#Ifosfamide_monotherapy|Ifosfamide]]
 
|[[#Ifosfamide_monotherapy|Ifosfamide]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
|style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|Not reported
+
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,530: Line 1,530:
 
'''21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles'''  
 
'''21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles'''  
 
====Subsequent treatment====
 
====Subsequent treatment====
*Patients with CR received another 2 cycles of teniposide. Patients with PR received teniposide until progression of disease, upon which they then received [[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_3|salvage EP therapy]]. Patients with complete response after 6 to 8 cycles of teniposide received prophylactic whole-brain irradiation:''
+
*Patients with CR received another 2 cycles of teniposide. Patients with PR received teniposide until progression of disease, upon which they then received [[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_3|salvage EP therapy]]. Patients with complete response after 6 to 8 cycles of teniposide received prophylactic whole-brain irradiation:
  
 
====Prophylactic whole-brain irradiation====
 
====Prophylactic whole-brain irradiation====
Line 1,547: Line 1,547:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:b2c397|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:b2c397|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.1995.13.10.2594 Loehrer et al. 1995]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.1995.13.10.2594 Loehrer et al. 1995]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin_.26_Etoposide_2|Cisplatin & Etoposide]]
|style="background-color:#d9ef8b"|Seems to have superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#d9ef8b" |Seems to have superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,578: Line 1,578:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:b0bc9a|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:b0bc9a|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
 
|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
Line 1,615: Line 1,615:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:60322b|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:60322b|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423 Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,639: Line 1,639:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:be9690|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:be9690|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/75.long Reck et al. 2011]
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/75.long Reck et al. 2011]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,663: Line 1,663:
 
===Regimen===
 
===Regimen===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429175/ Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429175/ Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (C)
 
|[[#Sunitinib_monotherapy|Sunitinib monotherapy]]
 
|[[#Sunitinib_monotherapy|Sunitinib monotherapy]]
|style="background-color:#fc8d59"|Seems to have inferior PFS
+
| style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior PFS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,688: Line 1,688:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:957c3e|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:957c3e|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429175/ Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429175/ Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (E)
 
|[[#Observation|Observation]]
 
|[[#Observation|Observation]]
|style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior PFS
+
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior PFS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,718: Line 1,718:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:514e41|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:514e41|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/32/35/4012.long von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/32/35/4012.long von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#Topotecan_monotherapy|Topotecan]]
 
|[[#Topotecan_monotherapy|Topotecan]]
|style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior PFS
+
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior PFS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,750: Line 1,750:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:35da2b|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:35da2b|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 33%"|Study
+
! style="width: 33%" |Study
!style="width: 33%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 33%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 33%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 33%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990869/ Lammers et al. 2014]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990869/ Lammers et al. 2014]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|33% (95% CI, 14-52%)
 
|33% (95% CI, 14-52%)
 
|-
 
|-
Line 1,775: Line 1,775:
 
===Regimen===
 
===Regimen===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/34/5441.long O'Brien et al. 2006]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/34/5441.long O'Brien et al. 2006]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Topotecan_monotherapy|Oral topotecan]]
 
|[[#Topotecan_monotherapy|Oral topotecan]]
|style="background-color:#fc8d59"|Seems to have inferior OS
+
| style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,801: Line 1,801:
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:83cdbf|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:83cdbf|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/2/658.long von Pawel et al. 1999]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/2/658.long von Pawel et al. 1999]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Topotecan_monotherapy|Topotecan]]
 
|[[#Topotecan_monotherapy|Topotecan]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,828: Line 1,828:
 
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:531cce|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:531cce|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/12/10/2022.long Ihde et al. 1994]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/12/10/2022.long Ihde et al. 1994]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,856: Line 1,856:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:65860f|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:65860f|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2824211 Postmus et al. 1987]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2824211 Postmus et al. 1987]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,881: Line 1,881:
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:159cb4|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:159cb4|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
 
|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2802%2900074-0/abstract Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Non-randomized portion of RCT
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Non-randomized portion of RCT
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,906: Line 1,906:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:e7a275|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:e7a275|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30104-8/fulltext Goto et al. 2016 (JCOG0605)]
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30104-8/fulltext Goto et al. 2016 (JCOG0605)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#Topotecan_monotherapy|Topotecan]]
 
|[[#Topotecan_monotherapy|Topotecan]]
|style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,937: Line 1,937:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:a6b72f|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:a6b72f|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959804994904553 Smyth et al. 1994]
 
|[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959804994904553 Smyth et al. 1994]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,959: Line 1,959:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:4970d7|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:4970d7|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2154857 Einhorn et al. 1990]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2154857 Einhorn et al. 1990]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/8/10/1613.long Johnson et al. 1990]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/8/10/1613.long Johnson et al. 1990]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 1,990: Line 1,990:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:c74edb|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:c74edb|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2811%2900386-2/abstract Jacot et al. 2012]
 
|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2811%2900386-2/abstract Jacot et al. 2012]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,017: Line 2,017:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:5efd8c|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:5efd8c|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/4/557.long van der Lee et al. 2001]
 
|[http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/4/557.long van der Lee et al. 2001]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/21/8/1550.long Masters et al. 2003 (ECOG 1597)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/21/8/1550.long Masters et al. 2003 (ECOG 1597)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,044: Line 2,044:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:d82a3f|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:d82a3f|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277537988902428 Cantwell et al. 1988]
 
|[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277537988902428 Cantwell et al. 1988]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,072: Line 2,072:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:8e22a|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:8e22a|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2807%2900325-X/abstract Park et al. 2007]
 
|[http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5002%2807%2900325-X/abstract Park et al. 2007]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,098: Line 2,098:
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:aa43c1|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:aa43c1|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30098-5/abstract Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032)]
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30098-5/abstract Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase I/II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase I/II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,116: Line 2,116:
 
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:b6a1ee|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:b6a1ee|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30098-5/abstract Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032)]
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30098-5/abstract Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase I/II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase I/II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,142: Line 2,142:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:c0a7e0|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:c0a7e0|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/10/8/1225.long Masuda et al. 1992]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/10/8/1225.long Masuda et al. 1992]
|style="background-color:#ffffbe"|Phase II, <20 pts
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbe" |Phase II, <20 pts
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,165: Line 2,165:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:5a9324|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:5a9324|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30098-5/abstract Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032)]
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30098-5/abstract Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase I/II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase I/II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,187: Line 2,187:
 
===Variant #1, every 3 weeks {{#subobject:dbac57|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, every 3 weeks {{#subobject:dbac57|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151229/ Smit et al. 1998]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151229/ Smit et al. 1998]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,208: Line 2,208:
 
===Variant #2, weekly paclitaxel {{#subobject:658a5f|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, weekly paclitaxel {{#subobject:658a5f|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/26/1B/777.long Yamamoto et al. 2006]
 
|[http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/26/1B/777.long Yamamoto et al. 2006]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,237: Line 2,237:
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:792fd1|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:792fd1|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497567/ Zauderer et al. 2014]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497567/ Zauderer et al. 2014]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,254: Line 2,254:
 
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:96a285|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:96a285|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/18/4/1138.long Pietanza et al. 2012]
 
|[http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/18/4/1138.long Pietanza et al. 2012]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,281: Line 2,281:
 
===Variant #1, 1.0 mg/m<sup>2</sup> {{#subobject:a060a6|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, 1.0 mg/m<sup>2</sup> {{#subobject:a060a6|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30104-8/fulltext Goto et al. 2016 (JCOG0605)]
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30104-8/fulltext Goto et al. 2016 (JCOG0605)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Cisplatin.2C_Etoposide.2C_Irinotecan|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Irinotecan]]
 
|[[#Cisplatin.2C_Etoposide.2C_Irinotecan|Cisplatin, Etoposide, Irinotecan]]
|style="background-color:#d73027"|Inferior OS
+
| style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,299: Line 2,299:
 
===Variant #2, 1.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> {{#subobject:a08066|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, 1.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> {{#subobject:a08066|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/2/658.long von Pawel et al. 1999]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/2/658.long von Pawel et al. 1999]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#CAV_2|CAV]]
 
|[[#CAV_2|CAV]]
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/15/2086.long Eckardt et al. 2007]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/15/2086.long Eckardt et al. 2007]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|Oral topotecan
 
|Oral topotecan
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/32/35/4012.long von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/32/35/4012.long von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1)]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C)
 
|[[#Amrubicin_monotherapy|Amrubicin]]
 
|[[#Amrubicin_monotherapy|Amrubicin]]
|style="background-color:#fc8d59"|Seems to have inferior PFS
+
| style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior PFS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,330: Line 2,330:
 
'''21-day cycles'''  
 
'''21-day cycles'''  
  
''Duration varies depending on reference:
+
''Duration varies depending on reference:''
 
*In von Pawel et al. 1999 treatment is given until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or 6 cycles beyond maximal response. Patients with stable disease after 4 cycles could have treatment discontinued at physician discretion.  
 
*In von Pawel et al. 1999 treatment is given until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or 6 cycles beyond maximal response. Patients with stable disease after 4 cycles could have treatment discontinued at physician discretion.  
 
*In Eckardt et al. 2007, patients with complete or partial response continued treatment progression of disease or 2 cycles beyond best response. Patients with stable disease received at least 4 cycles therapy.
 
*In Eckardt et al. 2007, patients with complete or partial response continued treatment progression of disease or 2 cycles beyond best response. Patients with stable disease received at least 4 cycles therapy.
*In von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1), treatment was given for 6 cycles or until progression of disease. Patients who had at least stable disease by cycle 6 could receive another 6 cycles of treatment.''
+
*In von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1), treatment was given for 6 cycles or until progression of disease. Patients who had at least stable disease by cycle 6 could receive another 6 cycles of treatment.
  
 
===Variant #3, oral route {{#subobject:cb27be|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #3, oral route {{#subobject:cb27be|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 25%"|Study
+
! style="width: 25%" |Study
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
+
! style="width: 25%" |Comparator
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/34/5441.long O'Brien et al. 2006]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/34/5441.long O'Brien et al. 2006]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|[[#Best_supportive_care|Best supportive care]]
 
|[[#Best_supportive_care|Best supportive care]]
|style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior OS
+
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior OS
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/15/2086.long Eckardt et al. 2007]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/15/2086.long Eckardt et al. 2007]
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E)
+
| style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E)
 
|IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup>)
 
|IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup>)
|style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,377: Line 2,377:
 
===Variant #1, 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> {{#subobject:be1346|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> {{#subobject:be1346|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/227555 Furuse et al. 1996]
 
|[https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/227555 Furuse et al. 1996]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,391: Line 2,391:
 
===Variant #2, 30 mg/m<sup>2</sup> {{#subobject:f20f90|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, 30 mg/m<sup>2</sup> {{#subobject:f20f90|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.ejcancer.com/article/0959-8049(93)90112-S/pdf Jassem et al. 1993]
 
|[https://www.ejcancer.com/article/0959-8049(93)90112-S/pdf Jassem et al. 1993]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 2,415: Line 2,415:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:5c569f|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:5c569f|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!style="width: 50%"|Study
+
! style="width: 50%" |Study
!style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30098-5/abstract Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032)]
 
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)30098-5/abstract Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032)]
|style="background-color:#91cf61"|Phase I/II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase I/II
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 17:55, 28 September 2018

Section editor
TravisOsterman.jpg
Travis Osterman, DO, MS
Nashville, TN

Twitter: TravisOsterman
LinkedIn
48 regimens on this page
100 variants on this page


Guidelines

ASCO

ESMO

NCCN

Limited stage, induction

Carboplatin & Etoposide

back to top

EP: Etoposide, Paraplatin (Carboplatin)

Variant #1, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Lee et al. 2009 Phase III (C) Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide, then RT Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

Variant #2, 1 day of oral etoposide per cycle

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Lee et al. 2009 Phase III (C) Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide, then RT Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. Lee SM, Woll PJ, Rudd R, Ferry D, O'Brien M, Middleton G, Spiro S, James L, Ali K, Jitlal M, Hackshaw A. Anti-angiogenic therapy using thalidomide combined with chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Aug 5;101(15):1049-57. Epub 2009 Jul 16. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

CC/DE & RT

back to top

CC/DE & RT: Cyclophosphamide & Cisplatin alternating with Doxorubicin & Etoposide, with Radiation Therapy

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Arriagada et al. 1993 Phase III (E) Lower-dose CC/DE Seems to have superior OS

Here for historic reference.

Chemoradiotherapy

References

  1. Arriagada R, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Rivière A, Monnet I, Chomy P, Tuchais C, Tarayre M, Ruffié P. Initial chemotherapeutic doses and survival in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 16;329(25):1848-52. link to original article PubMed

Cisplatin & Etoposide

back to top

EP: Etoposide, Platinol (Cisplatin)

Regimen

Study Evidence
Evans et al. 1985 Phase II

Patients with limited stage disease responding to therapy received prophylactic cranial irradiation, 4 Gy fractions given once per day x 5 fractions (total dose: 20 Gy) over 5 days between cycles 3 and 4.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

21 to 28-day cycle for 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. Evans WK, Shepherd FA, Feld R, Osoba D, Dang P, Deboer G. VP-16 and cisplatin as first-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1985 Nov;3(11):1471-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Limited stage, definitive chemoradiotherapy

Carboplatin, Etoposide, RT

back to top

EP & RT: Etoposide, Paraplatin (Carboplatin), Radiation Therapy

Variant #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Skarlos et al. 2001 Randomized Phase II (E) Carboplatin, Etoposide, early HTRT Might have superior ORR

Chemoradiotherapy

  • Carboplatin (Paraplatin) AUC 6 IV over 60 minutes once on day 1, given first, before etoposide
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 100 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once per day on days 1 to 3, given second, after carboplatin
  • Concurrent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation therapy (HTRT), 1.5 Gy fractions given twice per day (at least 4, but preferably 6 hours between fractions) x 30 fractions (total dose: 45 Gy) over 3 weeks. Skarlos et al. 2001 examined two different timings for radiation therapy. There was no significant difference between early vs. late HTRT, though there was a trend toward higher response rate for late HTRT. Early HTRT is given during cycle 1 of chemotherapy; late HTRT is given during cycle 4 of chemotherapy.

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

Variant #2

Study Evidence
Okamoto et al. 1999 Phase II

Patients in Okamoto et al. 1999 were greater than or equal to 70 years old.

Chemoradiotherapy

  • Carboplatin (Paraplatin) AUC 5 IV over 60 minutes once on day 1, given first, before etoposide
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 100 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 1 to 3, given second, after carboplatin
  • Thoracic radiation was given "after chemotherapy"--no details about dose or exact schedule given.
  • Palliative radiation therapy was allowed to control persistent pain from bony metastases

Supportive medications

  • Dexamethasone (Decadron) 8 mg IV once per day on days 1 to 3 prior to chemotherapy
  • Granisetron 40 mcg/kg IV once per day on days 1 to 3 prior to chemotherapy
  • G-CSF 2 mcg/kg SC given for grade 3 or greater leukopenia/neutropenia

28-day cycle for up to 4 cycles

References

  1. Okamoto H, Watanabe K, Nishiwaki Y, Mori K, Kurita Y, Hayashi I, Masutani M, Nakata K, Tsuchiya S, Isobe H, Saijo N. Phase II study of area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve-based carboplatin plus standard-dose intravenous etoposide in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Nov;17(11):3540-5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Skarlos DV, Samantas E, Briassoulis E, Panoussaki E, Pavlidis N, Kalofonos HP, Kardamakis D, Tsiakopoulos E, Kosmidis P, Tsavdaridis D, Tzitzikas J, Tsekeris P, Kouvatseas G, Zamboglou N, Fountzilas G. Randomized comparison of early versus late hyperfractionated thoracic irradiation concurrently with chemotherapy in limited disease small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG). Ann Oncol. 2001 Sep;12(9):1231-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

CEV & RT

back to top

CEV & RT: Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, Vincristine, Radiation Therapy

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Sundstrøm et al. 2002 Phase III (C) Cisplatin, Etoposide, RT Inferior OS

Inferior to EP & RT; placed here for reference reasons only.

Chemoradiotherapy

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. Sundstrøm S, Bremnes RM, Kaasa S, Aasebø U, Hatlevoll R, Dahle R, Boye N, Wang M, Vigander T, Vilsvik J, Skovlund E, Hannisdal E, Aamdal S; Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group. Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial with 5 years' follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 15;20(24):4665-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin, Etoposide, RT

back to top

EP & RT: Etoposide, Platinol (Cisplatin), Radiation Therapy

Variant #1, 60/360

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Turrisi et al. 1999 (Intergroup 0096) Phase III (E) Cisplatin, Etoposide, once per day RT Seems to have superior OS

Chemoradiotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Subsequent treatment

  • After completing 4 cycles of chemotherapy, patients were restaged. Because of the high rate of brain metastases (50%), patients with CR were offered Prophylactic cranial irradiation

Variant #2, 75 with partially oral etoposide

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Sundstrøm et al. 2002 Phase III (E) CEV & RT Superior OS

Chemoradiotherapy

  • Cisplatin (Platinol) 75 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 100 mg/m2 IV once on day 1; then 200 mg/m2 PO once per day on days 2 to 4, taken on an empty stomach
  • Concurrent thoracic radiation therapy, 2.8 Gy fractions given once per day x 15 fractions (total dose: 42 Gy) over 3 weeks, given "between the third and fourth chemotherapy courses"

Supportive medications

  • "Standard prehydration and posthydration procedures were followed in conjunction with cisplatin administration."

21-day cycle for up to 5 cycles

Subsequent treatment

Variant #3, 75/300

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Faivre-Finn et al. 2017 (CONVERT) Phase III (E) Cisplatin, Etoposide, once per day RT Seems not superior

Chemoradiotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles

Variant #4, 75/300, split doses of cisplatin

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Faivre-Finn et al. 2017 (CONVERT) Phase III (E) Cisplatin, Etoposide, once per day RT Seems not superior

Chemoradiotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles

Variant #5, 80/300 x 1

Study Evidence
Saito et al. 2006 (WJTOG 9902) Phase II

Chemoradiotherapy

  • Cisplatin (Platinol) 80 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 100 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 3
  • Concurrent thoracic radiation therapy, 1.5 Gy fractions given twice per day (at least 4, but preferably 6 hours between fractions) x 30 fractions (total dose: 45 Gy) over 3 weeks, started on cycle 1 day 2 of chemotherapy

28-day cycle for 1 cycle

Subsequent treatment

Variant #6, 80/300 x 4

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Takada et al. 2002 (JCOG 9104) Phase III (E) Cisplatin, Etoposide, sequential RT Might have superior OS

Chemoradiotherapy

28-day cycle for 4 cycles

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. Intergroup 0096: Turrisi AT 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, Sause WT, Livingston RB, Komaki R, Wagner H, Aisner S, Johnson DH. Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 28;340(4):265-71. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. JCOG 9104: Takada M, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, Yokota S, Nishiwaki Y, Watanabe K, Noda K, Tamura T, Fukuda H, Saijo N. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with cisplatin and etoposide for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9104. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jul 15;20(14):3054-60. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed content property of HemOnc.org
  3. Sundstrøm S, Bremnes RM, Kaasa S, Aasebø U, Hatlevoll R, Dahle R, Boye N, Wang M, Vigander T, Vilsvik J, Skovlund E, Hannisdal E, Aamdal S; Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group. Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial with 5 years' follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 15;20(24):4665-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Saito H, Takada Y, Ichinose Y, Eguchi K, Kudoh S, Matsui K, Nakagawa K, Takada M, Negoro S, Tamura K, Ando M, Tada T, Fukuoka M; West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902. Phase II study of etoposide and cisplatin with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy followed by irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 20;24(33):5247-52. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  5. Faivre-Finn C, Snee M, Ashcroft L, Appel W, Barlesi F, Bhatnagar A, Bezjak A, Cardenal F, Fournel P, Harden S, Le Pechoux C, McMenemin R, Mohammed N, O'Brien M, Pantarotto J, Surmont V, Van Meerbeeck JP, Woll PJ, Lorigan P, Blackhall F; CONVERT Study Team. Concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (CONVERT): an open-label, phase 3, randomised, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1116-1125. Epub 2017 Jun 20. link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed

Limited state, consolidation after upfront therapy

Cisplatin & Irinotecan

back to top

IP: Irinotecan, Platinol (Cisplatin)

Regimen

Study Evidence
Saito et al. 2006 (WJTOG 9902) Phase II

Preceding treatment

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • G-CSF (no additional details given) starting after day 4

28-day cycle for 3 cycles

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. WJTOG 9902: Saito H, Takada Y, Ichinose Y, Eguchi K, Kudoh S, Matsui K, Nakagawa K, Takada M, Negoro S, Tamura K, Ando M, Tada T, Fukuoka M; West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902. Phase II study of etoposide and cisplatin with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy followed by irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 20;24(33):5247-52. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Radiation therapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Evans et al. 1985 Phase II

Preceding treatment

Radiotherapy

  • "Patients who did not have evidence of tumor spread beyond the mediastinum and/or ipsilateral supraclavicular notes" received thoracic radiation in 250 cGy fractions x 10 fractions (total dose: 25 Gy)

References

  1. Evans WK, Shepherd FA, Feld R, Osoba D, Dang P, Deboer G. VP-16 and cisplatin as first-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1985 Nov;3(11):1471-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Lee SM, Woll PJ, Rudd R, Ferry D, O'Brien M, Middleton G, Spiro S, James L, Ali K, Jitlal M, Hackshaw A. Anti-angiogenic therapy using thalidomide combined with chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Aug 5;101(15):1049-57. Epub 2009 Jul 16. link to original article does not contain protocol PubMed

Whole brain irradiation

back to top

PCI: Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

Variant #1, 20 Gy

Study Evidence
Cox et al. 1981 Non-randomized
Evans et al. 1985 Phase II
Skarlos et al. 2001 Non-randomized portion of RCT

Note: in Evans et al. 1985, the WB-XRT is given in-between cycles 3 & 4.

Preceding treatment

Radiotherapy

Subsequent treatment

  • Evans et al. 1985: EP x 3

Variant #2, 24 Gy

Study Evidence
Takada et al. 2002 (JCOG 9104) Non-randomized portion of RCT

Preceding treatment

Prophylactic whole-brain irradiation

Variant #3, 25 Gy

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Turrisi et al. 1999 (Intergroup 0096) Non-randomized portion of RCT
Saito et al. 2006 (WJTOG 9902) Phase II
Le Péchoux et al. 2009 (PCI 99-01/EORTC 22003-08004/RTOG 0212/IFCT 99-01) Phase III (C) PCI x 36 Gy Seems not superior

Preceding treatment

Radiotherapy

Variant #4, 30 Gy

Study Evidence
Sundstrøm et al. 2002 Non-randomized portion of RCT

Preceding treatment

Radiotherapy

References

  1. Cox JD, Stanley K, Petrovich Z, Paig C, Yesner R. Cranial irradiation in cancer of the lung of all cell types. JAMA. 1981 Feb 6;245(5):469-72. link to original article PubMed
  2. Evans WK, Shepherd FA, Feld R, Osoba D, Dang P, Deboer G. VP-16 and cisplatin as first-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1985 Nov;3(11):1471-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Intergroup 0096: Turrisi AT 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, Sause WT, Livingston RB, Komaki R, Wagner H, Aisner S, Johnson DH. Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 28;340(4):265-71. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Meta-analysis: Aupérin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP, Le Péchoux C, Gregor A, Stephens RJ, Kristjansen PE, Johnson BE, Ueoka H, Wagner H, Aisner J; Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Overview Collaborative Group. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 12;341(7):476-84. link to original article PubMed
  5. JCOG 9104: Takada M, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, Yokota S, Nishiwaki Y, Watanabe K, Noda K, Tamura T, Fukuda H, Saijo N. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with cisplatin and etoposide for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9104. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jul 15;20(14):3054-60. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed content property of HemOnc.org
  6. Sundstrøm S, Bremnes RM, Kaasa S, Aasebø U, Hatlevoll R, Dahle R, Boye N, Wang M, Vigander T, Vilsvik J, Skovlund E, Hannisdal E, Aamdal S; Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group. Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial with 5 years' follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 15;20(24):4665-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  7. WJTOG 9902: Saito H, Takada Y, Ichinose Y, Eguchi K, Kudoh S, Matsui K, Nakagawa K, Takada M, Negoro S, Tamura K, Ando M, Tada T, Fukuoka M; West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902. Phase II study of etoposide and cisplatin with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy followed by irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 20;24(33):5247-52. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  8. PCI 99-01/EORTC 22003-08004/RTOG 0212/IFCT 99-01: Le Péchoux C, Dunant A, Senan S, Wolfson A, Quoix E, Faivre-Finn C, Ciuleanu T, Arriagada R, Jones R, Wanders R, Lerouge D, Laplanche A; Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) Collaborative Group. Standard-dose versus higher-dose prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in complete remission after chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy (PCI 99-01, EORTC 22003-08004, RTOG 0212, and IFCT 99-01): a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):467-74. Epub 2009 Apr 20. link to original article PubMed

Extensive stage, induction

ACE

back to top

ACE: Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide
AVE: Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), Vepesid (Etoposide), Endoxan (Cyclophosphamide)

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Klastersky et al. 1985 Phase II ORR: 66%
Sculier et al. 1993 Phase III (C) Multi-drug regimen Seems not superior
Baka et al. 2008 Phase III (C) EP Seems not superior

Used as a comparator arm in older studies; here for reference purposes only. The non-randomized results of Klastersky et al. 1985 established this regimen as a standard control.

Chemotherapy

References

  1. Klastersky J, Sculier JP, Dumont JP, Becquart D, Vandermoten G, Rocmans P, Michel J, Longeval E, Dalesio O. Combination chemotherapy with adriamycin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide for small cell carcinoma of the lung: a study by the EORTC Lung Cancer Working Party (Belgium). Cancer. 1985 Jul 1;56(1):71-5. link to original article PubMed
  2. Sculier JP, Paesmans M, Bureau G, Dabouis G, Libert P, Vandermoten G, Van Cutsem O, Berchier MC, Ries F, Michel J, Sergysels R, Mommen P, Klastersky J. Multiple-drug weekly chemotherapy versus standard combination regimen in small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized study conducted by the European Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Oct;11(10):1858-65. link to original article PubMed
  3. Baka S, Califano R, Ferraldeschi R, Aschroft L, Thatcher N, Taylor P, Faivre-Finn C, Blackhall F, Lorigan P. Phase III randomised trial of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008 Aug 5;99(3):442-7. link to original article link to PMC article contains protocol PubMed

Belotecan & Cisplatin

back to top

BP: Belotecan and Platinol (Cisplatin)

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Oh et al. 2016 (COMBAT) Phase III (E) EP 60/100 Non-inferior RR

Note: the total number of planned cycles is not described in the manuscript; total duration information here was provided by the authors.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 to 8 cycles

References

  1. COMBAT: Oh IJ, Kim KS, Park CK, Kim YC, Lee KH, Jeong JH, Kim SY, Lee JE, Shin KC, Jang TW, Lee HK, Lee KY, Lee SY. Belotecan/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma: a multi-center randomized phase III trial. BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 26;16:690. link to original article link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Carboplatin & Etoposide

back to top

EP: Etoposide and Paraplatin (Carboplatin)
CE: Carboplatin and Etoposide
Ca/E: Carboplatin and Etoposide

Variant #1, AUC 5/80

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Sekine et al. 2013 Phase III (C) Amrubicin Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles

Variant #2, AUC 5/100

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Socinski et al. 2009 Phase III (C) Carboplatin & Pemetrexed Superior OS
Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE) Randomized Phase II (C) Carboplatin, Etoposide, Bevacizumab Seems to have inferior PFS
Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504) Non-randomized portion of RCT
Jalal et al. 2017 (MATISSE) Randomized Phase II (C) PaCE Might have superior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Socinksi et al. 2009: "supportive therapies, such as erythropoietic agents or granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, were administered according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines"

21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

Variant #3, AUC 5 or 6/120

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR) Phase III (C) Carboplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

  • Carboplatin (Paraplatin) AUC 5 or 6 IV once on day 1
    • AUC 5 is used if eGFR calculated by EDTA; AUC 6 is used if eGFR calculated by Cockcroft Gault. If eGFR greater than 130 mL/min/1.73m2, dose calculation to be capped at GFR = 130 mL/min/1.73m2. Maximum dose = 1000 mg.
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 120 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 3

21-day cycle for 6 cycles

Variant #4, AUC 5 or 6/120, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Lee et al. 2009 Phase III (C) Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide Seems not superior
Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR) Phase III (C) Carboplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

  • Carboplatin (Paraplatin) AUC 5 or 6 IV once on day 1
    • Lee et al. 2009: AUC 5 is used
    • LUNGSTAR: AUC 5 is used if eGFR calculated by EDTA; AUC 6 is used if eGFR calculated by Cockcroft Gault. If eGFR greater than 130 mL/min/1.73m2, dose calculation to be capped at GFR = mL/min/1.73m2. Maximum dose = 1000 mg.
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 120 mg/m2 IV once on day 1, then 100 mg PO BID on days 2 & 3

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Variant #5, AUC 5 or 6/120, 1 day of oral etoposide per cycle

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Lee et al. 2009 Phase III (C) Carboplatin, Etoposide, Thalidomide Seems not superior
Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR) Phase III (C) Carboplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

  • Carboplatin (Paraplatin) AUC 5 or 6 IV once on day 1
    • Lee et al. 2009: AUC 5 is used
    • LUNGSTAR: AUC 5 is used if eGFR calculated by EDTA; AUC 6 is used if eGFR calculated by Cockcroft Gault. If eGFR greater than 130 mL/min/1.73m2, dose calculation to be capped at GFR = mL/min/1.73m2. Maximum dose = 1000 mg.
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 120 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 & 2, then 100 mg PO BID on day 3

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Variant #6, AUC 5/140

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Schmittel et al. 2006 Randomized Phase II (E) IP Might have inferior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Variant #7, AUC 5/100, 28-day cycles

Study Evidence
Okamoto et al. 1999 Phase II
Quoix et al. 2001 Phase II

Patients in Okamoto et al. 1999 and Quoix et al. 2001 were greater than or equal to 70 years old.

Chemotherapy

  • Carboplatin (Paraplatin) AUC 5 IV over 60 minutes once on day 1, given first
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 100 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 1 to 3, given second
  • Palliative radiation therapy was allowed to control persistent pain from bony metastases

Supportive medications

  • Dexamethasone (Decadron) 8 mg IV once on days 1 to 3 prior to chemotherapy
  • Granisetron 40 mcg/kg IV once on days 1 to 3 prior to chemotherapy
  • Okamoto et al. 1999: G-CSF 2 mcg/kg SC given for grade 3 or greater leukopenia/neutropenia
  • Quiox et al. 2001: "Haematopoietic growth factors were allowed as prophylactic or curative treatment only if grade 4 neutropenia greater than 7 days occurred"

28-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles

References

  1. Okamoto H, Watanabe K, Nishiwaki Y, Mori K, Kurita Y, Hayashi I, Masutani M, Nakata K, Tsuchiya S, Isobe H, Saijo N. Phase II study of area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve-based carboplatin plus standard-dose intravenous etoposide in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Nov;17(11):3540-5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Quoix E, Breton JL, Daniel C, Jacoulet P, Debieuvre D, Paillot N, Kessler R, Moreau L, Coëtmeur D, Lemarié E, Milleron B. Etoposide phosphate with carboplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2001 Jul;12(7):957-62. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Schmittel A, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Sebastian M, Martus P, Schulze K, Hortig P, Reeb M, Thiel E, Keilholz U. A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan plus carboplatin versus etoposide plus carboplatin treatment in patients with extended disease small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2006 Apr;17(4):663-7. Epub 2006 Jan 19. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Schmittel A, Sebastian M, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Martus P, Gauler TC, Kaufmann C, Hortig P, Fischer JR, Link H, Binder D, Fischer B, Caca K, Eberhardt WE, Keilholz U; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie Thoracic Oncology Study Group. A German multicenter, randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan-carboplatin with etoposide-carboplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011 Aug;22(8):1798-804. Epub 2011 Jan 25. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Lee SM, Woll PJ, Rudd R, Ferry D, O'Brien M, Middleton G, Spiro S, James L, Ali K, Jitlal M, Hackshaw A. Anti-angiogenic therapy using thalidomide combined with chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Aug 5;101(15):1049-57. Epub 2009 Jul 16. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  5. Socinski MA, Smit EF, Lorigan P, Konduri K, Reck M, Szczesna A, Blakely J, Serwatowski P, Karaseva NA, Ciuleanu T, Jassem J, Dediu M, Hong S, Visseren-Grul C, Hanauske AR, Obasaju CK, Guba SC, Thatcher N. Phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin compared with etoposide plus carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4787-92. Epub 2009 Aug 31. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  6. SALUTE: Spigel DR, Townley PM, Waterhouse DM, Fang L, Adiguzel I, Huang JE, Karlin DA, Faoro L, Scappaticci FA, Socinski MA. Randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from the SALUTE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2215-22. Epub 2011 Apr 18. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  7. Sekine I, Okamoto H, Horai T, Nakagawa K, Ohmatsu H, Yokoyama A, Katakami N, Shibuya M, Saijo N, Fukuoka M. A randomized phase III study of single-agent amrubicin vs carboplatin/etoposide in elderly patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2014 Mar;15(2):96-102. Epub 2013 Nov 14. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  8. CALGB 30504: Ready NE, Pang HH, Gu L, Otterson GA, Thomas SP, Miller AA, Baggstrom M, Masters GA, Graziano SL, Crawford J, Bogart J, Vokes EE. Chemotherapy with or without maintenance sunitinib for untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study-CALGB 30504 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 20;33(15):1660-5. Epub 2015 Mar 2. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
  9. LUNGSTAR: Seckl MJ, Ottensmeier CH, Cullen M, Schmid P, Ngai Y, Muthukumar D, Thompson J, Harden S, Middleton G, Fife KM, Crosse B, Taylor P, Nash S, Hackshaw A. Multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin added to first-line standard chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (LUNGSTAR). J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 10;35(14):1506-1514. Epub 2017 Feb 27. link to original article contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed
  10. MATISSE: Jalal SI, Lavin P, Lo G, Lebel F, Einhorn L. Carboplatin and etoposide with or without palifosfamide in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter, adaptive, randomized phase III study (MATISSE). J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;35(23):2619-2623. Epub 2017 Jun 12. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Carboplatin, Etoposide, Bevacizumab

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE) Randomized Phase II (E) Carboplatin & Etoposide Seems to have superior PFS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. Spigel DR, Townley PM, Waterhouse DM, Fang L, Adiguzel I, Huang JE, Karlin DA, Faoro L, Scappaticci FA, Socinski MA. Randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from the SALUTE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2215-22. Epub 2011 Apr 18. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Carboplatin & Irinotecan

back to top

IP: Irinotecan, Paraplatin (Carboplatin)

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Schmittel et al. 2006 Randomized Phase II (E) EP Might have superior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

References

  1. Schmittel A, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Sebastian M, Martus P, Schulze K, Hortig P, Reeb M, Thiel E, Keilholz U. A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan plus carboplatin versus etoposide plus carboplatin treatment in patients with extended disease small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2006 Apr;17(4):663-7. Epub 2006 Jan 19. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Schmittel A, Sebastian M, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Martus P, Gauler TC, Kaufmann C, Hortig P, Fischer JR, Link H, Binder D, Fischer B, Caca K, Eberhardt WE, Keilholz U; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie Thoracic Oncology Study Group. A German multicenter, randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan-carboplatin with etoposide-carboplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011 Aug;22(8):1798-804. Epub 2011 Jan 25. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Ipilimumab

back to top

Variant #1, phased ipilimumab

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Reck et al. 2011 Randomized Phase II (E) Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Seems to have superior irPFS
Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, concurrent Ipilimumab Not reported

Chemoimmunotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

Variant #2, concurrent ipilimumab

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Reck et al. 2011 Randomized Phase II (E) Carboplatin & Paclitaxel Seems not superior
Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, phased Ipilimumab Not reported

Chemoimmunotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. Reck M, Bondarenko I, Luft A, Serwatowski P, Barlesi F, Chacko R, Sebastian M, Lu H, Cuillerot JM, Lynch TJ. Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy in extensive-disease-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 2 trial. Ann Oncol. 2013 Jan;24(1):75-83. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

CAV

back to top

CAV: Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), Vincristine

Variant #1, flat-dose vincristine

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy Toxicity
Evans et al. 1987 Phase III (C) CAV/PE Seems to have inferior OS Similar toxicity

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle 6 cycles

Variant #2, uncapped vincristine

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy Toxicity
Girling 1996 Phase III (C) Oral Etoposide Seems to have superior OS
Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588) Phase III (C) Ifosfamide Seems not superior More toxic
Teniposide Seems not superior More toxic

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

  • ECOG E1588, CR: 2 more cycles of CAV, then PCI
  • ECOG E1588, PR: CAV until progression of disease, then salvage EP

References

  1. Evans WK, Feld R, Murray N, Willan A, Coy P, Osoba D, Shepherd FA, Clark DA, Levitt M, MacDonald A, Wilson K, Shelley W, Pater J. Superiority of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Oct;107(4):451-8. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med 1988 Mar;108(3):496. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Girling DJ; Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Comparison of oral etoposide and standard intravenous multidrug chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a stopped multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 1996 Aug 31;348(9027):563-6. link to original article PubMed
  3. ECOG E1588: Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Ritch PS, Lincoln ST, Blum RH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Study of either ifosfamide or teniposide compared to a standard chemotherapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized study (E1588). Lung Cancer. 2002 Sep;37(3):311-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

CDE

back to top

CDE: Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Etoposide

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Postmus et al. 1996 Phase III (C) CDE/VIMP Seems not superior

Note: this regimen is here for historical purposes, only.

Chemotherapy

References

  1. Postmus PE, Scagliotti G, Groen HJ, Gozzelino F, Burghouts JT, Curran D, Sahmoud T, Kirkpatrick A, Giaccone G, Splinter TA. Standard versus alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: an EORTC phase III trial. Eur J Cancer. 1996 Aug;32A(9):1498-503. link to original article PubMed

CEV

back to top

CEV: Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, Vincristine

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Sundstrøm et al. 2002 Phase III (C) Cisplatin & Etoposide Seems not superior

Not commonly used; here for reference purposes only.

Chemotherapy

References

  1. Sundstrøm S, Bremnes RM, Kaasa S, Aasebø U, Hatlevoll R, Dahle R, Boye N, Wang M, Vigander T, Vilsvik J, Skovlund E, Hannisdal E, Aamdal S; Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group. Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial with 5 years' follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 15;20(24):4665-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Etoposide

back to top

EP: Etoposide and Platinol (Cisplatin)
PE: Platinol (Cisplatin) and Etoposide

Variant #1, 60/100

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Oh et al. 2016 (COMBAT) Phase III (C) BP Non-inferior RR

Note: the total number of planned cycles is not described in the manuscript; total duration information here was provided by the authors.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 to 8 cycles

Variant #2, 60/120

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Hanna et al. 2006 Phase III (C) Cisplatin & Irinotecan Seems not superior
Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR) Phase III (C) Cisplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Per Hanna et al. 2006:
    • G-CSF used according to 1999 American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines
    • "Erythropoietin was allowed at the discretion of the treating physician."

21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles

Variant #3, 60/120, 1 day of oral etoposide per cycle

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR) Phase III (C) Cisplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Variant #4, 60/120, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Seckl et al. 2017 (LUNGSTAR) Phase III (C) Cisplatin, Etoposide, Pravastatin Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

Variant #5, 75/100

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE) Randomized Phase II (C) Cisplatin, Etoposide, Bevacizumab Seems to have inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Variant #6, 75/100, 3 days of oral etoposide per cycle

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Sundstrøm et al. 2002 Phase III (E) CEV Seems not superior

Note: Patients in Sundstrøm et al. 2002 with extensive stage disease did not routinely receive radiation therapy. "However, chest or cranial irradiation was optional if severe symptoms could not be palliated by chemotherapy."

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • "Standard prehydration and posthydration procedures were followed in conjunction with cisplatin administration."

21-day cycle for up to 5 cycles

Variant #7, 75/100, cisplatin split over 3 days

Study Evidence
Evans et al. 1985 Phase II

Chemotherapy

  • Cisplatin (Platinol) 25 mg/m2 IV "slow IV push" once per day on days 1 to 3, given second
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 100 mg/m2 IV over at least 30 minutes once per day on days 1 to 3, given first
  • Patients with disease responding to therapy received prophylactic cranial irradiation, 4 Gy fractions given daily x 5 fractions (total dose: 20 Gy) over 5 days between cycles 3 and 4
  • Locoregional radiation therapy was only used if symptoms persisted after 6 cycles of treatment: Radiation therapy, 250 cGy/rad fractions x 10 fractions (total dose: 2500 cGy/rad), given after cycle 6 of chemotherapy

Supportive medications

21 to 28-day cycle for 6 cycles

Variant #8, 80/80

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ihde et al. 1994 Phase III (C) High-dose EP Seems not superior
Niell et al. 2005 (CALGB 9732) Phase III (C) PET Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

  • Cisplatin (Platinol) 80 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
  • Etoposide (Vepesid) 80 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 3
  • Concurrent radiation therapy with the start of chemotherapy was given to patients with "brain metastases, epidural metastases, and impending pathologic bone fractures."
  • Patients with carcinomatous meningitis received Methotrexate (MTX) IT (dose/schedule not specified) and radiation to "functionally compromised areas of the CNS"

Supportive medications

  • "Half-normal saline was infused for 2 to 6 hours with Cisplatin (Platinol), usually in conjunction with a diuretic."
  • Corticosteroids were usually given for patients receiving radiation therapy for brain and epidural metastases.

21-day cycle for 4 to 8 cycles

Subsequent treatment

  • Ihde et al. 1994, CR after 4 cycles: an additional 4 cycles. Some patients were randomized to receive prophylactic cranial irradiation. Radiation could also be given at the patient's request. No details about dose/schedule given.
  • Ihde et al. 1994, PR, no response, or progressive disease: Salvage CAV or "an individualized 3-drug in vitro-selected regimen (IVSR) during cycles 5 to 8 if drug-sensitivity testing data were available."

Variant #9, 80/100

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Fukuoka et al. 1991 Phase III (C) CAV Not reported
CAV/PE Might have inferior OS
Noda et al. 2002 Phase III (C) Cisplatin & Irinotecan Inferior OS
Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504) Non-randomized portion of RCT
Sun et al. 2016 Phase III (C) AP Might have inferior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • "Hydration and administration of antiemetic drugs."

21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

Variant #10, 80/100, cisplatin split over 4 days

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Loehrer et al. 1995 Phase III (C) VIP Seems to have inferior OS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Variant #11, 80/120, 2 days of oral etoposide per cycle

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Baka et al. 2008 Phase III (E) ACE Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 6 cycles

Variant #12, 100/400

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Roth et al. 1992 Phase III (C) CAV
CAV/PE
Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

References

  1. Evans WK, Shepherd FA, Feld R, Osoba D, Dang P, Deboer G. VP-16 and cisplatin as first-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1985 Nov;3(11):1471-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Fukuoka M, Furuse K, Saijo N, Nishiwaki Y, Ikegami H, Tamura T, Shimoyama M, Suemasu K. Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Jun 19;83(12):855-61. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  3. Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, Schacter LP, Cherng NC, Cohen HJ, Crawford J, Randolph JA, Goodlow JL, Broun GO, Omura GA, Greco FA. Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Feb;10(2):282-91. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Ihde DC, Mulshine JL, Kramer BS, Steinberg SM, Linnoila RI, Gazdar AF, Edison M, Phelps RM, Lesar M, Phares JC, Grayson J, Minna JD, Johnson BE. Prospective randomized comparison of high-dose and standard-dose etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Oct;12(10):2022-34. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  5. Loehrer PJ Sr, Ansari R, Gonin R, Monaco F, Fisher W, Sandler A, Einhorn LH. Cisplatin plus etoposide with and without ifosfamide in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Oct;13(10):2594-9. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  6. Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, Negoro S, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, Fukuoka M, Mori K, Watanabe K, Tamura T, Yamamoto S, Saijo N; Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 10;346(2):85-91. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  7. Sundstrøm S, Bremnes RM, Kaasa S, Aasebø U, Hatlevoll R, Dahle R, Boye N, Wang M, Vigander T, Vilsvik J, Skovlund E, Hannisdal E, Aamdal S; Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group. Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial with 5 years' follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 15;20(24):4665-72. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  8. Niell HB, Herndon JE 2nd, Miller AA, Watson DM, Sandler AB, Kelly K, Marks RS, Perry MC, Ansari RH, Otterson G, Ellerton J, Vokes EE, Green MR; Cancer and Leukemia Group. Randomized phase III intergroup trial of etoposide and cisplatin with or without paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9732. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3752-9. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  9. Hanna N, Bunn PA Jr, Langer C, Einhorn L, Guthrie T Jr, Beck T, Ansari R, Ellis P, Byrne M, Morrison M, Hariharan S, Wang B, Sandler A. Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):2038-43. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  10. Baka S, Califano R, Ferraldeschi R, Aschroft L, Thatcher N, Taylor P, Faivre-Finn C, Blackhall F, Lorigan P. Phase III randomised trial of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008 Aug 5;99(3):442-7. link to original article link to PMC article contains protocol PubMed
  11. SALUTE: Spigel DR, Townley PM, Waterhouse DM, Fang L, Adiguzel I, Huang JE, Karlin DA, Faoro L, Scappaticci FA, Socinski MA. Randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from the SALUTE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2215-22. Epub 2011 Apr 18. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  12. CALGB 30504: Ready NE, Pang HH, Gu L, Otterson GA, Thomas SP, Miller AA, Baggstrom M, Masters GA, Graziano SL, Crawford J, Bogart J, Vokes EE. Chemotherapy with or without maintenance sunitinib for untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study-CALGB 30504 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 20;33(15):1660-5. Epub 2015 Mar 2. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
  13. Sun Y, Cheng Y, Hao X, Wang J, Hu C, Han B, Liu X, Zhang L, Wan H, Xia Z, Liu Y, Li W, Hou M, Zhang H, Xiu Q, Zhu Y, Feng J, Qin S, Luo X. Randomized phase III trial of amrubicin/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin as first-line treatment for extensive small-cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2016 Apr 9;16:265. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
  14. COMBAT: Oh IJ, Kim KS, Park CK, Kim YC, Lee KH, Jeong JH, Kim SY, Lee JE, Shin KC, Jang TW, Lee HK, Lee KY, Lee SY. Belotecan/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma: a multi-center randomized phase III trial. BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 26;16:690. link to original article link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  15. LUNGSTAR: Seckl MJ, Ottensmeier CH, Cullen M, Schmid P, Ngai Y, Muthukumar D, Thompson J, Harden S, Middleton G, Fife KM, Crosse B, Taylor P, Nash S, Hackshaw A. Multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin added to first-line standard chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (LUNGSTAR). J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 10;35(14):1506-1514. Epub 2017 Feb 27. link to original article contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed

Cisplatin, Etoposide, Bevacizumab

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE) Randomized Phase II (E) Cisplatin & Etoposide Seems to have superior PFS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. SALUTE: Spigel DR, Townley PM, Waterhouse DM, Fang L, Adiguzel I, Huang JE, Karlin DA, Faoro L, Scappaticci FA, Socinski MA. Randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from the SALUTE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2215-22. Epub 2011 Apr 18. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin & Irinotecan

back to top

IP: Irinotecan, Platinol (Cisplatin)

Variant #1, 30/65

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Hanna et al. 2006 Phase III (E) Cisplatin & Etoposide Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • G-CSF used according to 1999 American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines
  • "Erythropoietin was allowed at the discretion of the treating physician."

21-day cycle for 4 cycles; additional cycles could be given at physician discretion

Variant #2, 60/60

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Noda et al. 2002 Phase III (E) Cisplatin & Etoposide Superior OS
Satouchi et al. 2014 (JCOG 0509) Phase III (C) Amrubicin & Cisplatin Superior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • "Hydration and administration of antiemetic drugs."

28-day cycle for 4 cycles

References

  1. Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, Negoro S, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, Fukuoka M, Mori K, Watanabe K, Tamura T, Yamamoto S, Saijo N; Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 10;346(2):85-91. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Hanna N, Bunn PA Jr, Langer C, Einhorn L, Guthrie T Jr, Beck T, Ansari R, Ellis P, Byrne M, Morrison M, Hariharan S, Wang B, Sandler A. Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):2038-43. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. JCOG 0509: Satouchi M, Kotani Y, Shibata T, Ando M, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto N, Ichinose Y, Ohe Y, Nishio M, Hida T, Takeda K, Kimura T, Minato K, Yokoyama A, Atagi S, Fukuda H, Tamura T, Saijo N. Phase III study comparing amrubicin plus cisplatin with irinotecan plus cisplatin in the treatment of extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: JCOG 0509. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 20;32(12):1262-8. Epub 2014 Mar 17. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Docetaxel monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Hesketh et al. 1999 Phase II

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. Hesketh PJ, Crowley JJ, Burris HA 3rd, Williamson SK, Balcerzak SP, Peereboom D, Goodwin JW, Gross HM, Moore DF Jr, Livingston RB, Gandara DR. Evaluation of docetaxel in previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial. Cancer J Sci Am. 1999 Jul-Aug;5(4):237-41. contains protocol PubMed

Ifosfamide monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy Toxicity
Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588) Phase III (E) CAV Seems not superior Less toxic
Teniposide Seems not superior Not reported

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Mesna (Mesnex) 300 mg/m2 (route not specified) given three times per day on days 1 to 5; 0, 4, and 8 hours after each dose of ifosfamide

21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. ECOG E1588: Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Ritch PS, Lincoln ST, Blum RH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Study of either ifosfamide or teniposide compared to a standard chemotherapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized study (E1588). Lung Cancer. 2002 Sep;37(3):311-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Teniposide monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy Toxicity
Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588) Phase III (E) CAV Seems not superior Less toxic
Ifosfamide Seems not superior Not reported

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles

Subsequent treatment

  • Patients with CR received another 2 cycles of teniposide. Patients with PR received teniposide until progression of disease, upon which they then received salvage EP therapy. Patients with complete response after 6 to 8 cycles of teniposide received prophylactic whole-brain irradiation:

Prophylactic whole-brain irradiation

Radiation starts 1 week after completion of induction chemotherapy.

References

  1. Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Ritch PS, Lincoln ST, Blum RH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Study of either ifosfamide or teniposide compared to a standard chemotherapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized study (E1588). Lung Cancer. 2002 Sep;37(3):311-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

VIP

back to top

VIP: Vepesid (Etoposide), Ifosfamide, Platinol (Cisplatin)

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Loehrer et al. 1995 Phase III (E) Cisplatin & Etoposide Seems to have superior OS

This is of historic interest; due to excess toxicity and the difficult administration schedule, it is not commonly used.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

References

  1. Loehrer PJ Sr, Ansari R, Gonin R, Monaco F, Fisher W, Sandler A, Einhorn LH. Cisplatin plus etoposide with and without ifosfamide in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Oct;13(10):2594-9. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Extensive stage, consolidation after first-line therapy

Whole brain irradiation

back to top

PCI: Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588) Non-randomized portion of RCT
Slotman et al. 2007 (EORTC 22993) Phase III (E) Observation Superior OS

Preceding treatment

  • ECOG E1588: CAV versus Ifosfamide versus Teniposide
  • EORTC 22993: Chemotherapy x 4 to 6 cycles (regimen not specified)

Radiotherapy

  • Whole brain irradiation by one of the following: 20 Gy in 5 or 8 fractions, 24 Gy in 12 fractions, 25 Gy in 10 fractions, or 30 Gy in 10 or 12 fractions

One course

References

  1. Meta-analysis: Aupérin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP, Le Péchoux C, Gregor A, Stephens RJ, Kristjansen PE, Johnson BE, Ueoka H, Wagner H, Aisner J; Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Overview Collaborative Group. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 12;341(7):476-84. link to original article PubMed
  2. ECOG E1588: Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Ritch PS, Lincoln ST, Blum RH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Study of either ifosfamide or teniposide compared to a standard chemotherapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized study (E1588). Lung Cancer. 2002 Sep;37(3):311-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. EORTC 22993: Slotman B, Faivre-Finn C, Kramer G, Rankin E, Snee M, Hatton M, Postmus P, Collette L, Musat E, Senan S; EORTC Radiation Oncology Group and Lung Cancer Group. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 16;357(7):664-72. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Extensive stage, maintenance after first-line therapy

Bevacizumab monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Spigel et al. 2011 (SALUTE) Non-randomized portion of RCT

Preceding treatment

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. Spigel DR, Townley PM, Waterhouse DM, Fang L, Adiguzel I, Huang JE, Karlin DA, Faoro L, Scappaticci FA, Socinski MA. Randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from the SALUTE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2215-22. Epub 2011 Apr 18. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Ipilimumab monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Reck et al. 2011 Non-randomized portion of RCT

Preceding treatment

Immunotherapy

12-week cycles

References

  1. Reck M, Bondarenko I, Luft A, Serwatowski P, Barlesi F, Chacko R, Sebastian M, Lu H, Cuillerot JM, Lynch TJ. Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy in extensive-disease-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 2 trial. Ann Oncol. 2013 Jan;24(1):75-83. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Observation

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504) Randomized Phase II (C) Sunitinib monotherapy Seems to have inferior PFS

No further treatment.

Preceding treatment

References

  1. CALGB 30504: Ready NE, Pang HH, Gu L, Otterson GA, Thomas SP, Miller AA, Baggstrom M, Masters GA, Graziano SL, Crawford J, Bogart J, Vokes EE. Chemotherapy with or without maintenance sunitinib for untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study-CALGB 30504 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 20;33(15):1660-5. Epub 2015 Mar 2. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed

Sunitinib monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ready et al. 2015 (CALGB 30504) Randomized Phase II (E) Observation Seems to have superior PFS

Preceding treatment

Chemotherapy

Continued indefinitely

References

  1. CALGB 30504: Ready NE, Pang HH, Gu L, Otterson GA, Thomas SP, Miller AA, Baggstrom M, Masters GA, Graziano SL, Crawford J, Bogart J, Vokes EE. Chemotherapy with or without maintenance sunitinib for untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study-CALGB 30504 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 20;33(15):1660-5. Epub 2015 Mar 2. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed

Relapsed or refractory disease

Amrubicin monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1) Phase III (E) Topotecan Seems to have superior PFS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • "Prophylactic antibiotics were recommended for patients at high risk of infectious complications."

21-day cycle for 6 cycles or until progression of disease

Patients who had at least stable disease by cycle 6 could receive another 6 cycles of treatment.

References

  1. von Pawel J, Jotte R, Spigel DR, O'Brien ME, Socinski MA, Mezger J, Steins M, Bosquée L, Bubis J, Nackaerts K, Trigo JM, Clingan P, Schütte W, Lorigan P, Reck M, Domine M, Shepherd FA, Li S, Renschler MF. Randomized Phase III Trial of Amrubicin Versus Topotecan As Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 10;32(35):4012-9. Epub 2014 Nov 10. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Bendamustine monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Efficacy
Lammers et al. 2014 Phase II 33% (95% CI, 14-52%)

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles

References

  1. Lammers PE, Shyr Y, Li CI, Hutchison AS, Sandler A, Carbone DP, Johnson DH, Keedy VL, Horn L. Phase II study of bendamustine in relapsed chemotherapy sensitive or resistant small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Apr;9(4):559-62. link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed

Best supportive care

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
O'Brien et al. 2006 Phase III (C) Oral topotecan Seems to have inferior OS

No active antineoplastic treatment.

References

  1. O'Brien ME, Ciuleanu TE, Tsekov H, Shparyk Y, Cuceviá B, Juhasz G, Thatcher N, Ross GA, Dane GC, Crofts T. Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 1;24(34):5441-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

CAV

back to top

CAV: Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), Vincristine

Variant #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
von Pawel et al. 1999 Phase III (C) Topotecan Seems not superior

von Pawel et al. 1999 does not clearly state the duration of each cycle, but 21 days is used in other CAV regimens, and there was no information in the paper that contradicted this.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • G-CSF use per physician discretion

21-day cycles, given until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or 6 cycles beyond maximal response

Patients with stable disease after 4 cycles could have treatment discontinued at physician discretion.

Variant #2

Study Evidence
Ihde et al. 1994 Non-randomized portion of RCT

Treatment given after progression on standard-dose EP versus high-dose EP. Ihde et al. 1994 did not specifically say that the three medications were all given on day 1, but this is assumed to be the case based on other CAV regimens.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

References

  1. Ihde DC, Mulshine JL, Kramer BS, Steinberg SM, Linnoila RI, Gazdar AF, Edison M, Phelps RM, Lesar M, Phares JC, Grayson J, Minna JD, Johnson BE. Prospective randomized comparison of high-dose and standard-dose etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Oct;12(10):2022-34. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. von Pawel J, Schiller JH, Shepherd FA, Fields SZ, Kleisbauer JP, Chrysson NG, Stewart DJ, Clark PI, Palmer MC, Depierre A, Carmichael J, Krebs JB, Ross G, Lane SR, Gralla R. Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Feb;17(2):658-67. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

CDE

back to top

CDE: Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Etoposide

Regimen

Study Evidence
Postmus et al. 1987 Phase II

Note: this regimen is here for historical purposes, only.

Chemotherapy

References

  1. Postmus PE, Berendsen HH, van Zandwijk N, Splinter TA, Burghouts JT, Bakker W. Retreatment with the induction regimen in small cell lung cancer relapsing after an initial response to short term chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987 Sep;23(9):1409-11. PubMed

Cisplatin & Etoposide

back to top

EP: Etoposide, Platinol (Cisplatin)

Variant #1

Study Evidence
Ettinger et al. 2002 (ECOG E1588) Non-randomized portion of RCT

Treatment given after progression on CAV versus ifosfamide versus teniposide.

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Ritch PS, Lincoln ST, Blum RH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Study of either ifosfamide or teniposide compared to a standard chemotherapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized study (E1588). Lung Cancer. 2002 Sep;37(3):311-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Cisplatin, Etoposide, Irinotecan

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Goto et al. 2016 (JCOG0605) Phase III (E) Topotecan Superior OS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • G-CSF SC once per day beginning on cycle 1 day 9, continued throughout except for days of chemotherapy

14-day cycle for 5 cycles

References

  1. Goto K, Ohe Y, Shibata T, Seto T, Takahashi T, Nakagawa K, Tanaka H, Takeda K, Nishio M, Mori K, Satouchi M, Hida T, Yoshimura N, Kozuki T, Imamura F, Kiura K, Okamoto H, Sawa T, Tamura T; JCOG0605 investigators. Combined chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan versus topotecan alone as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0605): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1147-57. Epub 2016 Jun 14. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Docetaxel monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Smyth et al. 1994 Phase II

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. Smyth JF, Smith IE, Sessa C, Schoffski P, Wanders J, Franklin H, Kaye SB; The Early Clinical Trials Group of the EORTC. Activity of docetaxel (Taxotere) in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(8):1058-60. link to SD article contains protocol PubMed

Etoposide monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Einhorn et al. 1990 Phase II
Johnson et al. 1990 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • No routine antiemetics used.

21-day cycles

References

  1. Einhorn LH, Pennington K, McClean J. Phase II trial of daily oral VP-16 in refractory small cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Semin Oncol. 1990 Feb;17(1 Suppl 2):32-5. Not available online; abstract contains protocol PubMed
  2. Johnson DH, Greco FA, Strupp J, Hande KR, Hainsworth JD. Prolonged administration of oral etoposide in patients with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 1990 Oct;8(10):1613-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Epirubicin & Ifosfamide

back to top

EI: Epirubicin, Ifosfamide

Regimen

Study Evidence
Jacot et al. 2012 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Mesna (Mesnex) (dose/route/schedule not specified) on days 1 & 2
  • G-CSF use per physician discretion

28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles, until progression of disease, or unacceptable toxicity

References

  1. Jacot W, Pujol JL, Chakra M, Molinier O, Bozonnat MC, Gervais R, Quantin X. Epirubicin and ifosfamide in relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer. 2012 Feb;75(2):213-6. Epub 2011 Aug 9. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Gemcitabine monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
van der Lee et al. 2001 Phase II
Masters et al. 2003 (ECOG 1597) Phase II

Chemotherapy

  • Gemcitabine (Gemzar) 1000 mg/m2 in 250 mL normal saline IV over 30 minutes once per day on days 1, 8, 15
    • Patients in Masters et al. 2003 with less than grade 2 toxicity with cycle 1 received 1250 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes once per day on days 1, 8, 15 of cycles 2 and on

28-day cycle for up to 5 cycles; varies depending on reference. Masters et al. 2003 did not specify a maximum number of cycles.

References

  1. van der Lee I, Smit EF, van Putten JW, Groen HJ, Schlösser NJ, Postmus PE, Schramel FM. Single-agent gemcitabine in patients with resistant small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001 Apr;12(4):557-61. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Masters GA, Declerck L, Blanke C, Sandler A, DeVore R, Miller K, Johnson D; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Phase II trial of gemcitabine in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 1597. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1550-5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Ifosfamide monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Cantwell et al. 1988 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

21-day cycles

References

  1. Cantwell BM, Bozzino JM, Corris P, Harris AL. The multidrug resistant phenotype in clinical practice; evaluation of cross resistance to ifosfamide and mesna after VP16-213, doxorubicin and vincristine (VPAV) for small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988 Feb;24(2):123-9. link to SD article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Review: Marangolo M, Giovanis P. Ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer. Oncology. 2003;65 Suppl 2:46-9. Review. link to original article PubMed

Ifosfamide & Paclitaxel

back to top

PI: Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide

Regimen

Study Evidence
Park et al. 2007 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Mesna (Mesnex) 500 mg/m2 IV given three times per day on days 1 & 2: 15 minutes before, 4 hours after, and 8 hours after ifosfamide (total dose: 1500 mg/m2/day)

21-day cycles

References

  1. Park S, Ahn MJ, Ahn JS, Lee J, Hong YS, Park BB, Lee SC, Hwang IG, Park JO, Lim H, Kang WK, Park K. Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and ifosfamide as the third-line regimen in patients with heavily pretreated small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007 Oct;58(1):116-22. Epub 2007 Jul 12. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Ipilimumab & Nivolumab

back to top

Variant #1

Study Evidence
Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032) Phase I/II

Note: it is unclear which schedule of ipilimumab & nivolumab is preferred based on the abstract.

Immunotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Subsequent treatment

Variant #2

Study Evidence
Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032) Phase I/II

Note: it is unclear which schedule of ipilimumab & nivolumab is preferred based on the abstract.

Immunotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Subsequent treatment

References

  1. CheckMate 032: Antonia SJ, López-Martin JA, Bendell J, Ott PA, Taylor M, Eder JP, Jäger D, Pietanza MC, Le DT, de Braud F, Morse MA, Ascierto PA, Horn L, Amin A, Pillai RN, Evans J, Chau I, Bono P, Atmaca A, Sharma P, Harbison CT, Lin CS, Christensen O, Calvo E. Nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):883-95. Epub 2016 Jun 4. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Irinotecan monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Masuda et al. 1992 Phase II, <20 pts

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • No routine prophylaxis against diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting used.

References

  1. Masuda N, Fukuoka M, Kusunoki Y, Matsui K, Takifuji N, Kudoh S, Negoro S, Nishioka M, Nakagawa K, Takada M. CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Aug;10(8):1225-9. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Nivolumab monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032) Phase I/II

Immunotherapy

14-day cycles until progression or intolerance

References

  1. Antonia SJ, López-Martin JA, Bendell J, Ott PA, Taylor M, Eder JP, Jäger D, Pietanza MC, Le DT, de Braud F, Morse MA, Ascierto PA, Horn L, Amin A, Pillai RN, Evans J, Chau I, Bono P, Atmaca A, Sharma P, Harbison CT, Lin CS, Christensen O, Calvo E. Nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):883-95. Epub 2016 Jun 4. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Paclitaxel monotherapy

back to top

Variant #1, every 3 weeks

Study Evidence
Smit et al. 1998 Phase II

Chemotherapy

  • Paclitaxel (Taxol) 175 mg/m2 in 250 to 1000 mL of D5 or normal saline IV over 3 hours once on day 1

Supportive medications

21-day cycle for up to 5 cycles, progression of disease, or unacceptable toxicity

Variant #2, weekly paclitaxel

Study Evidence
Yamamoto et al. 2006 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • Dexamethasone (Decadron) 20 mg IV once 30 minutes prior to paclitaxel
  • Ranitidine (Zantac) 50 mg IV once 30 minutes prior to paclitaxel
  • Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) 50 mg IV once 30 minutes prior to paclitaxel
  • If ANC less than 1000/uL or WBC count less than 2 x 109/L, G-CSF 2 mcg/kg SC once per day is given until WBC count greater than or equal to 10 x 109/L, except on days that paclitaxel is given

8-week cycles

References

  1. Smit EF, Fokkema E, Biesma B, Groen HJ, Snoek W, Postmus PE. A phase II study of paclitaxel in heavily pretreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;77(2):347-51. contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed
  2. Yamamoto N, Tsurutani J, Yoshimura N, Asai G, Moriyama A, Nakagawa K, Kudoh S, Takada M, Minato Y, Fukuoka M. Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel for relapsed and refractory small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2006 Jan-Feb;26(1B):777-81. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Temozolomide monotherapy

back to top

Variant #1

Study Evidence
Zauderer et al. 2014 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

28-day cycles

Variant #2

Study Evidence
Pietanza et al. 2012 Phase II

Chemotherapy

  • Temozolomide (Temodar) 75 mg/m2 PO once per day on days 1 to 21, with no food 2 hours before or 1 hour after temozolomide

Supportive medications

  • Ondansetron (Zofran) 8 mg PO once prior to temozolomide prn nausea
  • Patients with at least grade 3 lymphopenia received prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (no specific medication/dose/schedule listed)

28-day cycles

References

  1. Pietanza MC, Kadota K, Huberman K, Sima CS, Fiore JJ, Sumner DK, Travis WD, Heguy A, Ginsberg MS, Holodny AI, Chan TA, Rizvi NA, Azzoli CG, Riely GJ, Kris MG, Krug LM. Phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with relapsed sensitive or refractory small cell lung cancer, with assessment of methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase as a potential biomarker. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Feb 15;18(4):1138-45. Epub 2012 Jan 6. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Zauderer MG, Drilon A, Kadota K, Huberman K, Sima CS, Bergagnini I, Sumner DK, Travis WD, Heguy A, Ginsberg MS, Holodny AI, Riely GJ, Kris MG, Krug LM, Pietanza MC. Trial of a 5-day dosing regimen of temozolomide in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancers with assessment of methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Lung Cancer. 2014 Nov;86(2):237-40. Epub 2014 Aug 17. contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed

Topotecan monotherapy

back to top

Variant #1, 1.0 mg/m2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Goto et al. 2016 (JCOG0605) Phase III (C) Cisplatin, Etoposide, Irinotecan Inferior OS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycle for 4 cycles

Variant #2, 1.5 mg/m2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
von Pawel et al. 1999 Phase III (E) CAV Seems not superior
Eckardt et al. 2007 Phase III (C) Oral topotecan Seems not superior
von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1) Phase III (C) Amrubicin Seems to have inferior PFS

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • (varies depending on reference):
  • G-CSF use per physician discretion
  • In von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1), "Prophylactic antibiotics were recommended for patients at high risk of infectious complications."

21-day cycles

Duration varies depending on reference:

  • In von Pawel et al. 1999 treatment is given until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or 6 cycles beyond maximal response. Patients with stable disease after 4 cycles could have treatment discontinued at physician discretion.
  • In Eckardt et al. 2007, patients with complete or partial response continued treatment progression of disease or 2 cycles beyond best response. Patients with stable disease received at least 4 cycles therapy.
  • In von Pawel et al. 2014 (ACT-1), treatment was given for 6 cycles or until progression of disease. Patients who had at least stable disease by cycle 6 could receive another 6 cycles of treatment.

Variant #3, oral route

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
O'Brien et al. 2006 Phase III (E) Best supportive care Seems to have superior OS
Eckardt et al. 2007 Phase III (E) IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m2) Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

Duration of treatment details vary depending on reference. In O'Brien et al. 2006, treatment is given for at least 4 cycles, though this depended on tolerability and response. In Eckardt et al. 2007, patients with complete or partial response continued treatment progression of disease or 2 cycles beyond best response. Patients with stable disease received at least 4 cycles of therapy.

References

  1. von Pawel J, Schiller JH, Shepherd FA, Fields SZ, Kleisbauer JP, Chrysson NG, Stewart DJ, Clark PI, Palmer MC, Depierre A, Carmichael J, Krebs JB, Ross G, Lane SR, Gralla R. Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Feb;17(2):658-67. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. O'Brien ME, Ciuleanu TE, Tsekov H, Shparyk Y, Cuceviá B, Juhasz G, Thatcher N, Ross GA, Dane GC, Crofts T. Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 1;24(34):5441-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Eckardt JR, von Pawel J, Pujol JL, Papai Z, Quoix E, Ardizzoni A, Poulin R, Preston AJ, Dane G, Ross G. Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2086-92. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. von Pawel J, Jotte R, Spigel DR, O'Brien ME, Socinski MA, Mezger J, Steins M, Bosquée L, Bubis J, Nackaerts K, Trigo JM, Clingan P, Schütte W, Lorigan P, Reck M, Domine M, Shepherd FA, Li S, Renschler MF. Randomized Phase III Trial of Amrubicin Versus Topotecan As Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 10;32(35):4012-9. Epub 2014 Nov 10. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  5. Goto K, Ohe Y, Shibata T, Seto T, Takahashi T, Nakagawa K, Tanaka H, Takeda K, Nishio M, Mori K, Satouchi M, Hida T, Yoshimura N, Kozuki T, Imamura F, Kiura K, Okamoto H, Sawa T, Tamura T; JCOG0605 investigators. Combined chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan versus topotecan alone as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0605): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1147-57. Epub 2016 Jun 14. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Vinorelbine monotherapy

back to top

Variant #1, 25 mg/m2

Study Evidence
Furuse et al. 1996 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Continued indefinitely

Variant #2, 30 mg/m2

Study Evidence
Jassem et al. 1993 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Continued indefinitely

References

  1. Jassem J, Karnicka-Mlodkowska H, van Pottelsberghe C, van Glabbeke M, Noseda MA, Ardizzoni A, Gozzelino F, Planting A, van Zandwijk N; EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. Phase II study of vinorelbine (Navelbine) in previously treated small cell lung cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(12):1720-2. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  2. Furuse K, Kubota K, Kawahara M, Takada M, Kimura I, Fujii M, Ohta M, Hasegawa K, Yoshida K, Nakajima S, Ogura T, Niitani H; Japan Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Study Group. Phase II study of vinorelbine in heavily previously treated small cell lung cancer. Oncology. 1996 Mar-Apr;53(2):169-72. link to original article contains protocol PubMed

Maintenance after salvage therapy

Nivolumab monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Antonia et al. 2016 (CheckMate 032) Phase I/II

Preceding treatment

Immunotherapy

14-day cycles until progression or intolerance

References

  1. CheckMate 032: Antonia SJ, López-Martin JA, Bendell J, Ott PA, Taylor M, Eder JP, Jäger D, Pietanza MC, Le DT, de Braud F, Morse MA, Ascierto PA, Horn L, Amin A, Pillai RN, Evans J, Chau I, Bono P, Atmaca A, Sharma P, Harbison CT, Lin CS, Christensen O, Calvo E. Nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):883-95. Epub 2016 Jun 4. link to original article contains protocol PubMed