Difference between revisions of "Multiple myeloma - historical"

From HemOnc.org - A Hematology Oncology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "#00[cC][dD]00" to "#1a9851")
m (Text replacement - "|'''Evidence'''" to "!Evidence")
Line 23: Line 23:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 62: Line 62:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/93/1/55.long Barlogie et al. 1999 (Total Therapy)]
 
|[http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/93/1/55.long Barlogie et al. 1999 (Total Therapy)]
Line 86: Line 86:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 126: Line 126:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 160: Line 160:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 189: Line 189:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 210: Line 210:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 237: Line 237:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198405243102104 Barlogie et al. 1984]
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198405243102104 Barlogie et al. 1984]
Line 262: Line 262:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1999.01279.x/full Segeren et al. 1999]
 
|[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1999.01279.x/full Segeren et al. 1999]
Line 282: Line 282:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/17/2434.full Cavo et al. 2007 (Bologna 96)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/17/2434.full Cavo et al. 2007 (Bologna 96)]
Line 330: Line 330:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
|-
 
|-
Line 358: Line 358:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 389: Line 389:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
|-
 
|-
Line 419: Line 419:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 456: Line 456:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 488: Line 488:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 532: Line 532:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(83)90739-0/abstract McElwain, Powles 1983]
 
|[http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(83)90739-0/abstract McElwain, Powles 1983]
Line 554: Line 554:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 586: Line 586:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 626: Line 626:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/93/1/55.long Barlogie et al. 1999 (Total Therapy)]
 
|[http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/93/1/55.long Barlogie et al. 1999 (Total Therapy)]
Line 656: Line 656:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/107/9/3474 Garban et al. 2006 (IFM99-03)]
 
|[http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/107/9/3474 Garban et al. 2006 (IFM99-03)]
Line 687: Line 687:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 717: Line 717:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 775: Line 775:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 807: Line 807:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/106/12/3755 Bladé et al. 2005]
 
|[http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/106/12/3755 Bladé et al. 2005]
Line 830: Line 830:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
!Comparator
 
!Comparator
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
Line 858: Line 858:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.1989.7.10.1514 Barlogie et al. 1989]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.1989.7.10.1514 Barlogie et al. 1989]
Line 880: Line 880:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
!Study
 
!Study
|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|'''Evidence''']]
+
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
 
|'''ORR'''
 
|'''ORR'''
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 21:57, 26 December 2017

Use of this site is subject to you reading and agreeing with the terms set forth in the disclaimer. If this is your first time visiting, we suggest you read the tutorial.

The purpose of this page is to provide references to regimens that are obsolete, outdated, or of historical interest only. As a general rule, this includes the inferior arm(s) of a randomized study, unless said regimens continue to be recommended by trustworthy sources such as the NCCN Guidelines. Is there a regimen missing from this list? Please go to the main multiple myeloma regimen page to find other regimens.

49 regimens on this page
88 variants on this page


First-line therapy

C-VAMP

back to top

C-VAMP: Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), MethylPrednisolone

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Raje et al. 1997 Phase III VAMP
Child et al. 2003 (MRC Myeloma VII) Phase III ABCM Seems to have superior OS

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles, given until maximal response was achieved

A minimum of 3 cycles given before stem cell harvest. Patients in MRC Myeloma VII proceeded to cyclophosphamide & G-CSF stem cell mobilization and high-dose melphalan & methylprednisolone with auto HSCT.

References

  1. Raje N, Powles R, Kulkarni S, Milan S, Middleton G, Singhal S, Mehta J, Millar B, Viner C, Raymond J, Treleaven J, Cunningham D, Gore M. A comparison of vincristine and doxorubicin infusional chemotherapy with methylprednisolone (VAMP) with the addition of weekly cyclophosphamide (C-VAMP) as induction treatment followed by autografting in previously untreated myeloma. Br J Haematol. 1997 Apr;97(1):153-60. link to original article PubMed
  2. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, Brown J, Drayson MT, Selby PJ; Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1875-83. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

EDAP

back to top

EDAP: Etoposide, Dexamethasone, Ara-C (Cytarabine), Platinol (Cisplatin)

Regimen

Study Evidence
Barlogie et al. 1999 (Total Therapy) Non-randomized

Given as a component of Total Therapy.

Chemotherapy

References

  1. Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Desikan KR, Mattox S, Vesole D, Siegel D, Tricot G, Munshi N, Fassas A, Singhal S, Mehta J, Anaissie E, Dhodapkar D, Naucke S, Cromer J, Sawyer J, Epstein J, Spoon D, Ayers D, Cheson B, Crowley J. Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 1999 Jan 1;93(1):55-65. link to original article PubMed

RD

back to top

RD: Revlimid (Lenalidomide) & high-dose Dexamethasone

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Rajkumar et al. 2009 (ECOG E4A03) Phase III Rd Inferior OS

This is the high-dose dexamethasone arm, and was intended for patients with previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma, bone marrow plasmacytosis (greater than or equal to 10% plasma cells or sheets of plasma cells) or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma, and measurable disease defined as serum monoclonal protein more than 1 g/dL and/or urine monoclonal protein greater than or equal to 200 mg/24 h.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • One of the following bisphosphonates:
  • Thromboprophylaxis mandatory (added mid-protocol after excess rates of DVT)

28-day cycle for 4 cycles (see below)

Responding patients could choose after 4 cycles to proceed to high-dose melphalan with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant or to continue RD until progression of disease or intolerable toxicity; nonresponders were transitioned to Thal-Dex (details not described).

References

  1. Rajkumar SV, Jacobus S, Callander NS, Fonseca R, Vesole DH, Williams ME, Abonour R, Siegel DS, Katz M, Greipp PR; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):29-37. Epub 2009 Oct 21. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):14. link to original article contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed

VAD

back to top

VAD: Vincristine, Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), Dexamethasone
VAd: Vincristine, Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), low-dose dexamethasone
Note: VAD is given as a bolus or a continuous infusion regimen; see variants for details.

Regimen #1

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Sonneveld et al. 2012 (HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4) Phase III PAD Seems to have inferior OS

This regimen was intended for patients 18 to 65 years of age with newly diagnosed MM, Durie-Salmon stage II to III, WHO performance status 0 to 2, or WHO 3 when caused by MM. Observed efficacy is for induction PAD, then transplant, then maintenance bortezomib compared with induction VAD, then transplant, then maintenance thalidomide.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

  • One of the following bisphosphonates recommended:
  • "Prophylactic antibiotics" (no further specifics) during induction therapy
  • Erythropoietin and pain medications at physician discretion
  • One of the following for Herpes zoster prophylaxis throughout bortezomib induction:
    • Acyclovir (Zovirax) 800 mg PO per day (did not specify whether taken once per day or as a divided twice per day dose)
    • Valacyclovir (Valtrex) 1000 mg PO per day (did not specify whether taken once per day or as a divided twice per day dose)

28-day cycle for 3 cycles

Stem cells collected 4 to 6 weeks after induction therapy; patients proceed to receive single autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HOVON-65) or tandem autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (GMMG-HD4).

Regimen #2

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Harousseau et al. 2010 (IFM 2005-01) Phase III VD Might have inferior PFS

This regimen was intended for patients age less than or equal to 65 years with untreated symptomatic MM with measurable paraprotein in serum (greater than 1.0 g/dL) or urine (greater than 0.2 g/24 h).

Chemotherapy

  • Vincristine (Oncovin) 0.4 mg/day IV continuous infusion over 4 days on days 1 to 4 (total dose per cycle: 1.6 mg)
  • Doxorubicin (Adriamycin) 9 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 4 days on days 1 to 4 (total dose per cycle: 36 mg/m2)
  • Dexamethasone (Decadron) as follows:
    • Cycles 1 & 2: 40 mg PO once per day on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, 17 to 20
    • Cycle 3 onwards: 40 mg PO once per day on days 1 to 4

Supportive medications

28-day cycle for 4 cycles

Patients were then randomized to DCEP consolidation or went directly to autologous hematopoietic cell transplant.

Regimen #3, "VAd"

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Rifkin et al. 2006 Phase III DVd Non-inferior ORR

This regimen was intended for patients greater than or equal to 18 years and fulfilling a diagnosis of stage II or III MM according to the Durie and Salmon criteria.

Chemotherapy

28-day cycles

Regimen #4, VAD bolus

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Dimopoulos et al. 2003 Phase III VAD doxil Seems not superior

This regimen was intended for all patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who were considered candidates for systemic treatment.

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

28-day cycle for 4 cycles

Regimen #5

Study Evidence
Barlogie et al. 1984 Phase II
Barlogie et al. 2006 (SWOG S9321) Non-randomized portion of RCT

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

35-day cycles

In Barlogie et al. 1984, treatment was given "until a maximum reduction in myeloma protein had occurred" and patients received four additional cycles of therapy beyond their best response. In SWOG S9321, patients with at least stable disease were randomized after 4 cycles to VBMCP versus melphalan & TBI, then auto HSCT.

Regimen #6

Study Evidence
Segeren et al. 1999 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

28-day cycles

Regimen #7

Study Evidence
Cavo et al. 2007 (Bologna 96) Non-randomized portion of RCT

This regimen was intended for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic or progressive MM, an upper age limit of 60 years, and previously untreated.

Chemotherapy

  • Vincristine (Oncovin) 0.4 mg/day IV continuous infusion over 4 days on days 1 to 4 (total dose per cycle: 1.6 mg)
  • Doxorubicin (Adriamycin) 9 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 4 days on days 1 to 4 (total dose per cycle: 36 mg/m2)
  • Dexamethasone (Decadron) as follows:
    • Cycles 1 & 3: 40 mg PO once per day on days 1 to 4
    • Cycles 2 & 4: 40 mg PO once per day on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, 17 to 20

28-day cycle for 4 cycles

Responders were randomized to single autologous hematopoietic cell transplant versus tandem autologous hematopoietic cell transplant.

References

  1. Barlogie B, Smith L, Alexanian R. Effective treatment of advanced multiple myeloma refractory to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med. 1984 May 24;310(21):1353-6. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Segeren CM, Sonneveld P, van der Holt B, Baars JW, Biesma DH, Cornellissen JJ, Croockewit AJ, Dekker AW, Fibbe WE, Löwenberg B, van Marwijk Kooy M, van Oers MH, Richel DJ, Schouten HC, Vellenga E, Verhoef GE, Wijermans PW, Wittebol S, Lokhorst HM. Vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) administered as rapid intravenous infusion for first-line treatment in untreated multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 1999 Apr;105(1):127-30. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. Dimopoulos MA, Pouli A, Zervas K, Grigoraki V, Symeonidis A, Repoussis P, Mitsouli C, Papanastasiou C, Margaritis D, Tokmaktsis A, Katodritou I, Kokkini G, Terpos E, Vyniou N, Tzilianos M, Chatzivassili A, Kyrtsonis MC, Panayiotidis P, Maniatis A; Greek Myeloma Study Group. Prospective randomized comparison of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) administered as intravenous bolus injection and VAD with liposomal doxorubicin as first-line treatment in multiple myeloma. Ann Oncol. 2003 Jul;14(7):1039-44. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  4. Garban F, Attal M, Michallet M, Hulin C, Bourhis JH, Yakoub-Agha I, Lamy T, Marit G, Maloisel F, Berthou C, Dib M, Caillot D, Deprijck B, Ketterer N, Harousseau JL, Sotto JJ, Moreau P. Prospective comparison of autologous stem cell transplantation followed by dose-reduced allograft (IFM99-03 trial) with tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (IFM99-04 trial) in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006 May 1;107(9):3474-80. Epub 2006 Jan 5. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Moreau P, Garban F, Attal M, Michallet M, Marit G, Hulin C, Benboubker L, Doyen C, Mohty M, Yakoub-Agha I, Leyvraz S, Casassus P, Avet-Loiseau H, Garderet L, Mathiot C, Harousseau JL; IFM Group. Long-term follow-up results of IFM99-03 and IFM99-04 trials comparing nonmyeloablative allotransplantation with autologous transplantation in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008 Nov 1;112(9):3914-5. link to original article PubMed
    2. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article PubMed
  5. Rifkin RM, Gregory SA, Mohrbacher A, Hussein MA. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone provide significant reduction in toxicity compared with doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a Phase III multicenter randomized trial. Cancer. 2006 Feb 15;106(4):848-58. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  6. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Leyvraz S, Doyen C, Hulin C, Benboubker L, Yakoub Agha I, Bourhis JH, Garderet L, Pegourie B, Dumontet C, Renaud M, Voillat L, Berthou C, Marit G, Monconduit M, Caillot D, Grobois B, Avet-Loiseau H, Moreau P, Facon T; Inter-Groupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM). Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006 Nov 15;108(10):3289-94. Epub 2006 Jul 27. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article PubMed
  7. Cavo M, Tosi P, Zamagni E, Cellini C, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, Di Raimondo F, Volpe E, Ronconi S, Cangini D, Narni F, Carubelli A, Masini L, Catalano L, Fiacchini M, de Vivo A, Gozzetti A, Lazzaro A, Tura S, Baccarani M. Prospective, randomized study of single compared with double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Bologna 96 clinical study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 10;25(17):2434-41. Epub 2007 May 7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Sub-group analysis: Cavo M, Zamagni E, Tosi P, Tacchetti P, Cellini C, Cangini D, de Vivo A, Testoni N, Nicci C, Terragna C, Grafone T, Perrone G, Ceccolini M, Tura S, Baccarani M; Bologna 2002 study. Superiority of thalidomide and dexamethasone over vincristine-doxorubicindexamethasone (VAD) as primary therapy in preparation for autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2005 Jul 1;106(1):35-9. Epub 2005 Mar 10. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  8. Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, Greipp PR, Lazarus HM, Hurd DD, McCoy J, Moore DF Jr, Dakhil SR, Lanier KS, Chapman RA, Cromer JN, Salmon SE, Durie B, Crowley JC. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):929-36. Epub 2006 Jan 23. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 10;24(17):2687. Moore, Dennis F Jr [added]. link to original article refers to protocol in Barlogie et al. 1984 PubMed
    1. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed
  9. Lokhorst HM, van der Holt B, Zweegman S, Vellenga E, Croockewit S, van Oers MH, von dem Borne P, Wijermans P, Schaafsma R, de Weerdt O, Wittebol S, Delforge M, Berenschot H, Bos GM, Jie KS, Sinnige H, van Marwijk-Kooy M, Joosten P, Minnema MC, van Ammerlaan R, Sonneveld P; Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Group (HOVON). A randomized phase 3 study on the effect of thalidomide combined with adriamycin, dexamethasone, and high-dose melphalan, followed by thalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010 Feb 11;115(6):1113-20. Epub 2009 Oct 30. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  10. Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, Marit G, Caillot D, Mohty M, Lenain P, Hulin C, Facon T, Casassus P, Michallet M, Maisonneuve H, Benboubker L, Maloisel F, Petillon MO, Webb I, Mathiot C, Moreau P. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 20;28(30):4621-9. Epub 2010 Sep 7. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
  11. Sonneveld P, Schmidt-Wolf IG, van der Holt B, El Jarari L, Bertsch U, Salwender H, Zweegman S, Vellenga E, Broyl A, Blau IW, Weisel KC, Wittebol S, Bos GM, Stevens-Kroef M, Scheid C, Pfreundschuh M, Hose D, Jauch A, van der Velde H, Raymakers R, Schaafsma MR, Kersten MJ, van Marwijk-Kooy M, Duehrsen U, Lindemann W, Wijermans PW, Lokhorst HM, Goldschmidt HM. Bortezomib induction and maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the randomized phase III HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 20;30(24):2946-55. Epub 2012 Jul 16. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

VAMP

back to top

VAMP: Vincristine, Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), MethylPrednisolone

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator
Raje et al. 1997 Phase III C-VAMP

Chemotherapy

References

  1. Raje N, Powles R, Kulkarni S, Milan S, Middleton G, Singhal S, Mehta J, Millar B, Viner C, Raymond J, Treleaven J, Cunningham D, Gore M. A comparison of vincristine and doxorubicin infusional chemotherapy with methylprednisolone (VAMP) with the addition of weekly cyclophosphamide (C-VAMP) as induction treatment followed by autografting in previously untreated myeloma. Br J Haematol. 1997 Apr;97(1):153-60. link to original article PubMed
  2. Fermand JP, Ravaud P, Chevret S, Divine M, Leblond V, Belanger C, Macro M, Pertuiset E, Dreyfus F, Mariette X, Boccacio C, Brouet JC. High-dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: up-front or rescue treatment? Results of a multicenter sequential randomized clinical trial. Blood. 1998 Nov 1;92(9):3131-6. link to original articlePubMed
  3. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, Brown J, Drayson MT, Selby PJ; Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1875-83. link to original article PubMed
  4. Fermand JP, Katsahian S, Divine M, Leblond V, Dreyfus F, Macro M, Arnulf B, Royer B, Mariette X, Pertuiset E, Belanger C, Janvier M, Chevret S, Brouet JC, Ravaud P; Group Myelome-Autogreffe. High-dose therapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation compared with conventional treatment in myeloma patients aged 55 to 65 years: long-term results of a randomized control trial from the Group Myelome-Autogreffe. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9227-33. Epub 2005 Nov 7. link to original articlePubMed

VBMC

back to top

VBMC: Vincristine, BiCNU (Carmustine), Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Child et al. 2003 (MRC Myeloma VII) Phase III Melphalan & Methylprednisolone, then auto HSCT Seems to have inferior OS

Chemotherapy

Followed by interferon alfa maintenance.

References

  1. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, Brown J, Drayson MT, Selby PJ; Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1875-83. link to original article PubMed

VBMCP

back to top

VBMCP: Vincristine, BiCNU (Carmustine), Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator
Barlogie et al. 2006 (SWOG S9321) Phase III Melphalan & TBI, then auto HSCT

Chemotherapy

References

  1. Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, Greipp PR, Lazarus HM, Hurd DD, McCoy J, Moore DF Jr, Dakhil SR, Lanier KS, Chapman RA, Cromer JN, Salmon SE, Durie B, Crowley JC. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):929-36. Epub 2006 Jan 23. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 10;24(17):2687. Moore, Dennis F Jr [added]. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article PubMed

VBMCP/VBAD

back to top

VBMCP: Vincristine, BiCNU (Carmustine), Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone
VBAD: Vincristine, BiCNU (Carmustine), Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), Dexamethasone

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Bladé et al. 2005 (PETHEMA) Phase III VBMCP/VBAD, then MEL-200, then auto HSCT
VBMCP/VBAD, then MEL-140 & TBI, then auto HSCT
Seems not superior

Note: it is not clear from the manuscript what the primary endpoint was. While this regimen had inferior CR, there was no difference in PFS or OS.

Chemotherapy, VBMCP portion

Chemotherapy, VBAD portion

References

  1. Bladé J, Rosiñol L, Sureda A, Ribera JM, Díaz-Mediavilla J, García-Laraña J, Mateos MV, Palomera L, Fernández-Calvo J, Martí JM, Giraldo P, Carbonell F, Callís M, Trujillo J, Gardella S, Moro MJ, Barez A, Soler A, Font L, Fontanillas M, San Miguel J; Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatía Maligna (PETHEMA). High-dose therapy intensification compared with continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma patients responding to the initial chemotherapy: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial from the Spanish cooperative group PETHEMA. Blood. 2005 Dec 1;106(12):3755-9. Epub 2005 Aug 16. link to original article PubMed

VMCP

back to top

VMCP: Vincristine, Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Fermand et al. 2005 Phase III VAMP, then auto HSCT Might have inferior EFS

Chemotherapy

Monthly cycles

References

  1. Fermand JP, Katsahian S, Divine M, Leblond V, Dreyfus F, Macro M, Arnulf B, Royer B, Mariette X, Pertuiset E, Belanger C, Janvier M, Chevret S, Brouet JC, Ravaud P; Group Myelome-Autogreffe. High-dose therapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation compared with conventional treatment in myeloma patients aged 55 to 65 years: long-term results of a randomized control trial from the Group Myelome-Autogreffe. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9227-33. Epub 2005 Nov 7. link to original articlecontains verified protocol PubMed

VMCP/BVAP

back to top

VMCP: Vincristine, Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone
BVAP: BiCNU (Carmustine), Vincristine, Adriamycin (Doxorubicin), Prednisone

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Attal et al. 1996 Phase III VMCP/BVAP alone Seems to have superior OS

Chemotherapy, VMCP portion

21-day cycle for 2 to 3 cycles, given in an alternating fashion with BVAP

Chemotherapy, BVAP portion

21-day cycle for 2 to 3 cycles, given in an alternating fashion with VMCP

VMCP and BVAP are given in an alternating fashion x a total of 4 to 6 cycles

Patients with a WHO performance status less than 3, creatinine less than 1.7 mg/dL (150 µmol/L), and bone marrow (collected after cycle 4) with greater than 200 million nucleated cells/kg would proceed to melphalan, total body irradiation (TBI), and autologous transplant.

References

  1. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF, Casassus P, Maisonneuve H, Facon T, Ifrah N, Payen C, Bataille R. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Français du Myélome. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 11;335(2):91-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Consolidation after first-line therapy

Melphalan monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
McElwain, Powles 1983 Pilot"|#ffffbe|Pilot Study

Note that this is highly obsolete but included for historical interest. Stem cell rescue was NOT used.

Chemotherapy

References

  1. McElwain TJ, Powles RL. High-dose intravenous melphalan for plasma-cell leukaemia and myeloma. Lancet. 1983 Oct 8;2(8354):822-4. link to original article PubMed
  2. Sonneveld P, van der Holt B, Segeren CM, Vellenga E, Croockewit AJ, Verhoe GE, Cornelissen JJ, Schaafsma MR, van Oers MH, Wijermans PW, Westveer PH, Lokhorst HM; Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON). Intermediate-dose melphalan compared with myeloablative treatment in multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the Dutch Cooperative Group HOVON 24 trial. Haematologica. 2007 Jul;92(7):928-35. link to original article PubMed

Melphalan, then auto HSCT, then Melphalan & Busulfan, then auto HSCT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Cavo et al. 2007 (Bologna 96) Phase III Melphalan, then auto HSCT Superior EFS

Chemotherapy, first transplant

Stem cells re-infused on day 0

Chemotherapy, second transplant

Stem cells re-infused on day 0

References

  1. Cavo M, Tosi P, Zamagni E, Cellini C, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, Di Raimondo F, Volpe E, Ronconi S, Cangini D, Narni F, Carubelli A, Masini L, Catalano L, Fiacchini M, de Vivo A, Gozzetti A, Lazzaro A, Tura S, Baccarani M. Prospective, randomized study of single compared with double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Bologna 96 clinical study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 10;25(17):2434-41. Epub 2007 May 7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

MEL200, then auto HSCT, then MEL220 & Dexamethasone, then auto HSCT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Moreau et al. 2005 (IFM 99-04) Phase III MEL200, then MEL220 + Dex + B-E8 Seems not superior

This regimen was meant for patients who did not have an HLA-identical sibling donor.

Preceding treatment

Chemotherapy, first transplant

Stem cells re-infused on day 0

Chemotherapy, second transplant

Stem cells re-infused on day 0

No further treatment.

References

  1. Moreau P, Hullin C, Garban F, Yakoub-Agha I, Benboubker L, Attal M, Marit G, Fuzibet JG, Doyen C, Voillat L, Berthou C, Ketterer N, Casassus P, Monconduit M, Michallet M, Najman A, Sotto JJ, Bataille R, Harousseau JL; Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome group. Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma: final results of the prospective and randomized IFM 99-04 protocol. Blood. 2006 Jan 1;107(1):397-403. Epub 2005 Sep 13. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Garban F, Attal M, Michallet M, Hulin C, Bourhis JH, Yakoub-Agha I, Lamy T, Marit G, Maloisel F, Berthou C, Dib M, Caillot D, Deprijck B, Ketterer N, Harousseau JL, Sotto JJ, Moreau P. Prospective comparison of autologous stem cell transplantation followed by dose-reduced allograft (IFM99-03 trial) with tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (IFM99-04 trial) in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006 May 1;107(9):3474-80. Epub 2006 Jan 5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    2. Update: Moreau P, Garban F, Attal M, Michallet M, Marit G, Hulin C, Benboubker L, Doyen C, Mohty M, Yakoub-Agha I, Leyvraz S, Casassus P, Avet-Loiseau H, Garderet L, Mathiot C, Harousseau JL; IFM Group. Long-term follow-up results of IFM99-03 and IFM99-04 trials comparing nonmyeloablative allotransplantation with autologous transplantation in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008 Nov 1;112(9):3914-5. link to original article PubMed
    3. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

Melphalan, then auto HSCT, then Melphalan & TBI, then auto HSCT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Barlogie et al. 1999 (Total Therapy) Non-randomized

This regimen was intended for patients not achieving at least PR after the first transplant.

Chemotherapy, first transplant

Stem cells re-infused on day 0

Chemoradiotherapy, second transplant

  • Melphalan (Alkeran) 140 mg/m2 IV once on day -4
  • TBI dose of 850 to 1020 cGy in 5 to 6 fractions delivered on days -3 to -1

Stem cells re-infused on day 0

References

  1. Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Desikan KR, Mattox S, Vesole D, Siegel D, Tricot G, Munshi N, Fassas A, Singhal S, Mehta J, Anaissie E, Dhodapkar D, Naucke S, Cromer J, Sawyer J, Epstein J, Spoon D, Ayers D, Cheson B, Crowley J. Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 1999 Jan 1;93(1):55-65. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Facon T, Guilhot F, Doyen C, Fuzibet JG, Monconduit M, Hulin C, Caillot D, Bouabdallah R, Voillat L, Sotto JJ, Grosbois B, Bataille R; InterGroupe Francophone du Myélome. Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 25;349(26):2495-502. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun17;350(25):2628. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article PubMed

Melphalan, then auto HSCT, then RIC allo HSCT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Garban et al. 2006 (IFM99-03) Non-randomized

This regimen was meant for patients who had an HLA-identical sibling donor, and is here for historical interest.

Preceding treatment

Chemotherapy, first transplant

Stem cells re-infused on day 0

After an interval of 2 months, patients proceeded to allogeneic transplant with busulfan, fludarabine, ATG conditioning.

References

  1. Garban F, Attal M, Michallet M, Hulin C, Bourhis JH, Yakoub-Agha I, Lamy T, Marit G, Maloisel F, Berthou C, Dib M, Caillot D, Deprijck B, Ketterer N, Harousseau JL, Sotto JJ, Moreau P. Prospective comparison of autologous stem cell transplantation followed by dose-reduced allograft (IFM99-03 trial) with tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (IFM99-04 trial) in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006 May 1;107(9):3474-80. Epub 2006 Jan 5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Moreau P, Garban F, Attal M, Michallet M, Marit G, Hulin C, Benboubker L, Doyen C, Mohty M, Yakoub-Agha I, Leyvraz S, Casassus P, Avet-Loiseau H, Garderet L, Mathiot C, Harousseau JL; IFM Group. Long-term follow-up results of IFM99-03 and IFM99-04 trials comparing nonmyeloablative allotransplantation with autologous transplantation in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008 Nov 1;112(9):3914-5. link to original article PubMed
    2. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article PubMed
  2. Bruno B, Rotta M, Patriarca F, Mordini N, Allione B, Carnevale-Schianca F, Giaccone L, Sorasio R, Omedè P, Baldi I, Bringhen S, Massaia M, Aglietta M, Levis A, Gallamini A, Fanin R, Palumbo A, Storb R, Ciccone G, Boccadoro M. A comparison of allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 15;356(11):1110-20. link to original article PubMed

Melphalan & Methylprednisolone, then auto HSCT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Child et al. 2003 (MRC Myeloma VII) Phase III VBMC Seems to have superior OS

Preceding treatment

Chemotherapy

Followed by interferon alfa maintenance.

References

  1. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, Brown J, Drayson MT, Selby PJ; Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1875-83. link to original article PubMed

Melphalan & TBI, then auto HSCT

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Attal et al. 1996 (IFM90) Phase III VMCP/BVAP x 18 Seems to have superior OS
Moreau et al. 2002 (IFM 9502) Phase III High-dose melphalan & autologous transplant Might have inferior OS
Attal et al. 2003 (IFM94) Phase III Melphalan, then auto HSCT, then Melphalan & TBI, then auto HSCT Inferior OS
Barlogie et al. 2006 (SWOG S9321) Phase III VBMCP To be completed

Preceding treatment

  • IFM90: VMCP alternating with BVAP for 4 to 6 cycles
  • IFM 9502 and SWOG S9321: VAD x 3
  • IFM 94: VAD x 3 to 4

Chemoradiotherapy

  • Melphalan (Alkeran) 140 mg/m2 IV (day not specified)
  • Total-body irradiation in 2 Gy fractions once per day x 4 = total dose of 8 Gy, without lung shielding

One course; relative date of stem cell re-infusion not specified

Followed by interferon alfa maintenance.

References

  1. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF, Casassus P, Maisonneuve H, Facon T, Ifrah N, Payen C, Bataille R. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Français du Myélome. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 11;335(2):91-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article PubMed
  2. Moreau P, Facon T, Attal M, Hulin C, Michallet M, Maloisel F, Sotto JJ, Guilhot F, Marit G, Doyen C, Jaubert J, Fuzibet JG, François S, Benboubker L, Monconduit M, Voillat L, Macro M, Berthou C, Dorvaux V, Pignon B, Rio B, Matthes T, Casassus P, Caillot D, Najman N, Grosbois B, Bataille R, Harousseau JL; Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. Comparison of 200 mg/m(2) melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m(2) melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome 9502 randomized trial. Blood. 2002 Feb 1;99(3):731-5. link to original article PubMed
  3. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Facon T, Guilhot F, Doyen C, Fuzibet JG, Monconduit M, Hulin C, Caillot D, Bouabdallah R, Voillat L, Sotto JJ, Grosbois B, Bataille R; InterGroupe Francophone du Myélome. Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 25;349(26):2495-502. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun17;350(25):2628. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article PubMed
  4. Bladé J, Rosiñol L, Sureda A, Ribera JM, Díaz-Mediavilla J, García-Laraña J, Mateos MV, Palomera L, Fernández-Calvo J, Martí JM, Giraldo P, Carbonell F, Callís M, Trujillo J, Gardella S, Moro MJ, Barez A, Soler A, Font L, Fontanillas M, San Miguel J; Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatía Maligna (PETHEMA). High-dose therapy intensification compared with continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma patients responding to the initial chemotherapy: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial from the Spanish cooperative group PETHEMA. Blood. 2005 Dec 1;106(12):3755-9. Epub 2005 Aug 16. link to original article PubMed
  5. Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, Greipp PR, Lazarus HM, Hurd DD, McCoy J, Moore DF Jr, Dakhil SR, Lanier KS, Chapman RA, Cromer JN, Salmon SE, Durie B, Crowley JC. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):929-36. Epub 2006 Jan 23. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 10;24(17):2687. Moore, Dennis F Jr [added]. link to original article refers to protocol in Barlogie et al. 1984 PubMed
    1. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article PubMed

Maintenance after first-line therapy

Interferon alfa monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ludwig et al. 2010 Phase III Interferon alfa & Thalidomide Inferior PFS

This is of historical interest but is no longer commonly used.

Immunotherapy

References

  1. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF, Casassus P, Maisonneuve H, Facon T, Ifrah N, Payen C, Bataille R. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Français du Myélome. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 11;335(2):91-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Moreau P, Durie BG, Harousseau JL. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1209-14. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543. link to original article PubMed
  2. Meta-analysis: Fritz E, Ludwig H. Interferon-alpha treatment in multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 30 randomised trials among 3948 patients. Ann Oncol. 2000 Nov;11(11):1427-36. link to original article PubMed
  3. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, Brown J, Drayson MT, Selby PJ; Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1875-83. link to original article PubMed
  4. Lokhorst HM, van der Holt B, Zweegman S, Vellenga E, Croockewit S, van Oers MH, von dem Borne P, Wijermans P, Schaafsma R, de Weerdt O, Wittebol S, Delforge M, Berenschot H, Bos GM, Jie KS, Sinnige H, van Marwijk-Kooy M, Joosten P, Minnema MC, van Ammerlaan R, Sonneveld P; Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Group (HOVON). A randomized phase 3 study on the effect of thalidomide combined with adriamycin, dexamethasone, and high-dose melphalan, followed by thalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010 Feb 11;115(6):1113-20. Epub 2009 Oct 30. link to original article PubMed
  5. Ludwig H, Adam Z, Tóthová E, Hajek R, Labar B, Egyed M, Spicka I, Gisslinger H, Drach J, Kuhn I, Hinke A, Zojer N. Thalidomide maintenance treatment increases progression-free but not overall survival in elderly patients with myeloma. Haematologica. 2010 Sep;95(9):1548-54. Epub 2010 Apr 23. link to original article PubMed
  6. Rosiñol L, Oriol A, Teruel AI, de la Guía AL, Blanchard M, de la Rubia J, Granell M, Sampol M, Palomera L, González Y, Etxebeste M, Martínez-Martínez R, Hernández MT, de Arriba F, Alegre A, Cibeira M, Mateos M, Martínez-López J, Lahuerta JJ, San Miguel J, Bladé J. Bortezomib and thalidomide maintenance after stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a PETHEMA/GEM trial. Leukemia. 2017 Sep;31(9):1922-1927. Epub 2017 Jan 23. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Interferon alfa & Dexamethasone

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence
Bladé et al. 2005 Non-randomized portion of RCT

This is of historical interest but is no longer commonly used.

Chemoimmunotherapy

References

  1. Bladé J, Rosiñol L, Sureda A, Ribera JM, Díaz-Mediavilla J, García-Laraña J, Mateos MV, Palomera L, Fernández-Calvo J, Martí JM, Giraldo P, Carbonell F, Callís M, Trujillo J, Gardella S, Moro MJ, Barez A, Soler A, Font L, Fontanillas M, San Miguel J; Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatía Maligna (PETHEMA). High-dose therapy intensification compared with continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma patients responding to the initial chemotherapy: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial from the Spanish cooperative group PETHEMA. Blood. 2005 Dec 1;106(12):3755-9. Epub 2005 Aug 16. link to original article PubMed

Interferon alfa & Thalidomide

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ludwig et al. 2010 Phase III Interferon alfa Superior PFS

This is of historical interest but is no longer commonly used.

Chemoimmunotherapy

References

  1. Ludwig H, Adam Z, Tóthová E, Hajek R, Labar B, Egyed M, Spicka I, Gisslinger H, Drach J, Kuhn I, Hinke A, Zojer N. Thalidomide maintenance treatment increases progression-free but not overall survival in elderly patients with myeloma. Haematologica. 2010 Sep;95(9):1548-54. Epub 2010 Apr 23. link to original article PubMed

Relapsed or refractory

EDAP

back to top

EDAP: Etoposide, Dexamethasone, Ara-C (Cytarabine), Platinol (Cisplatin)

Regimen

Study Evidence
Barlogie et al. 1989 Non-randomized

Chemotherapy

References

  1. Barlogie B, Velasquez WS, Alexanian R, Cabanillas F. Etoposide, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin in vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone-refractory myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 1989 Oct;7(10):1514-7. link to original article PubMed

Pembrolizumab, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence ORR
Badros et al. 2017 Phase II 60%

This is of historical interest only. While the phase II had a high degree of efficacy (thus meeting our inclusion criteria), subsequent phase III trials were halted by the FDA for excess deaths in this arm; see "Note added in proof" in the paper for more details.

Chemoimmunotherapy

References

  1. Badros A, Hyjek E, Ma N, Lesokhin A, Dogan A, Rapoport AP, Kocoglu M, Lederer E, Philip S, Milliron T, Dell C, Goloubeva O, Singh Z. Pembrolizumab, pomalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2017 Sep 7;130(10):1189-1197. Epub 2017 May 1. link to original article PubMed