Complex multipart regimens

From HemOnc.org - A Hematology Oncology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to Top

The purpose of this page is to capture information about complex comparisons that is not easily conveyed on the treatment regimen pages. Many complex multipart RCTs are of the "Y-shaped" format "A followed by B1 versus B2" or "A1 versus A2 followed by B" and this can be captured on the treatment regimen pages. This page will convey information on more complicated designs, such as "A followed by B versus B followed by A" or "A followed by B versus C followed by D".


Acute myeloid leukemia

COG AAML0531

To be completed

References

  1. Gamis AS, Alonzo TA, Meshinchi S, Sung L, Gerbing RB, Raimondi SC, Hirsch BA, Kahwash SB, Heerema-McKenney A, Winter L, Glick K, Davies SM, Byron P, Smith FO, Aplenc R. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin in children and adolescents with de novo acute myeloid leukemia improves event-free survival by reducing relapse risk: results from the randomized phase III Children’s Oncology Group trial AAML0531. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3021-32. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

UK MRC AML12

To be completed

References

  1. Burnett AK, Grimwade D, Solomon E, Wheatley K, Goldstone AH. Presenting white blood cell count and kinetics of molecular remission predict prognosis in acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid: result of the randomized MRC trial. Blood. 1999 Jun 15;93(12):4131-43. link to original article PubMed

UK MRC AML15

To be completed

References

  1. Burnett AK, Hills RK, Milligan D, Kjeldsen L, Kell J, Russell NH, Yin JA, Hunter A, Goldstone AH, Wheatley K. Identification of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia who benefit from the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin: results of the MRC AML15 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):369-77. Epub 2010 Dec 20. link to original article PubMed

Acute promyelocytic leukemia

C9710

Note: this trial included a second randomization during the maintenance phase, which is not complex and is therefore not reported here.

Arm 1

Arm 2, with ATO3

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Without ATO3 Inferior EFS
With ATO3 Superior EFS

References

  1. Powell BL, Moser B, Stock W, Gallagher RE, Willman CL, Stone RM, Rowe JM, Coutre S, Feusner JH, Gregory J, Couban S, Appelbaum FR, Tallman MS, Larson RA. Arsenic trioxide improves event-free and overall survival for adults with acute promyelocytic leukemia: North American Leukemia Intergroup Study C9710. Blood. 2010 Nov 11;116(19):3751-7. Epub 2010 Aug 12. link to original article contains dosing details in manuscript link to PMC article PubMed

Breast cancer

ABCSG-8

ABCSG-8: Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8

Arm 1, monotherapy (Control)

Arm 2, sequential (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Efficacy is based on the 2012 update.

Regimen Comparative Efficacy
Tamoxifen Might have inferior RFS
Tamoxifen, then Anastrozole Might have superior RFS

References

  1. Jakesz R, Jonat W, Gnant M, Mittlboeck M, Greil R, Tausch C, Hilfrich J, Kwasny W, Menzel C, Samonigg H, Seifert M, Gademann G, Kaufmann M, Wolfgang J; ABCSG; GABG. Switching of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsiveearly breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years' adjuvant tamoxifen: combined results of ABCSG trial 8 and ARNO 95 trial. Lancet. 2005 Aug 6-12;366(9484):455-62. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Dubsky PC, Jakesz R, Mlineritsch B, Pöstlberger S, Samonigg H, Kwasny W, Tausch C, Stöger H, Haider K, Fitzal F, Singer CF, Stierer M, Sevelda P, Luschin-Ebengreuth G, Taucher S, Rudas M, Bartsch R, Steger GG, Greil R, Filipcic L, Gnant M. Tamoxifen and anastrozole as a sequencing strategy: a randomized controlled trial in postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer from the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 1;30(7):722-8. Epub 2012 Jan 23. link to original article PubMed

ARNO 95

Arm 1, monotherapy (Control)

Arm 2, sequential (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Efficacy is based on the 2007 update.

Regimen Comparative Efficacy
Tamoxifen, then Anastrozole Seems to have superior OS
Tamoxifen Seems to have inferior OS

References

  1. Jakesz R, Jonat W, Gnant M, Mittlboeck M, Greil R, Tausch C, Hilfrich J, Kwasny W, Menzel C, Samonigg H, Seifert M, Gademann G, Kaufmann M, Wolfgang J; ABCSG and the GABG. Switching of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsiveearly breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years' adjuvant tamoxifen: combined results of ABCSG trial 8 and ARNO 95 trial. Lancet. 2005 Aug 6-12;366(9484):455-62. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Kaufmann M, Jonat W, Hilfrich J, Eidtmann H, Gademann G, Zuna I, von Minckwitz G. Improved overall survival in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer after anastrozole initiated after treatment with tamoxifen compared with continued tamoxifen: the ARNO 95 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 1;25(19):2664-70. Epub 2007 Jun 11. link to original article PubMed

BIG 1-98

Arm 1, monotherapy

Arm 2, sequential

Arm 3, monotherapy

Arm 4, sequential

Comparative efficacy

  • Analyzed by several methods.

Comparison 1

Reported efficacy is based on the 2018 update.

Monotherapy Efficacy
Letrozole Might have superior OS
Tamoxifen Might have inferior OS

Comparison 2

Sequential therapies Efficacy
Letrozole, then Tamoxifen Seems not superior
Tamoxifen, then Letrozole Seems not superior

Comparison 3

Letrozole-containing therapies Efficacy
Letrozole Seems not superior
Letrozole, then Tamoxifen Seems not superior
Tamoxifen, then Letrozole Seems not superior

References

  1. Thürlimann B, Keshaviah A, Coates AS, Mouridsen H, Mauriac L, Forbes JF, Paridaens R, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Rabaglio M, Smith I, Wardley A, Price KN, Goldhirsch A; BIG. A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 29;353(26):2747-57. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2006 May 18;354(20):2200. Wardly, Andrew [corrected to Wardley, Andrew ]. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Coates AS, Keshaviah A, Thürlimann B, Mouridsen H, Mauriac L, Forbes JF, Paridaens R, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Colleoni M, Láng I, Del Mastro L, Smith I, Chirgwin J, Nogaret JM, Pienkowski T, Wardley A, Jakobsen EH, Price KN, Goldhirsch A. Five years of letrozole compared with tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: update of study BIG 1-98. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):486-92. Epub 2007 Jan 2. link to original article PubMed
    2. Subgroup analysis: Rasmussen BB, Regan MM, Lykkesfeldt AE, Dell'Orto P, Del Curto B, Henriksen KL, Mastropasqua MG, Price KN, Méry E, Lacroix-Triki M, Braye S, Altermatt HJ, Gelber RD, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Goldhirsch A, Gusterson BA, Thürlimann B, Coates AS, Viale G; BIG. Adjuvant letrozole versus tamoxifen according to centrally-assessed ERBB2 status for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: supplementary results from the BIG 1-98 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Jan;9(1):23-8. Epub 2007 Dec 20. link to original article PubMed
    3. Subgroup analysis: Crivellari D, Sun Z, Coates AS, Price KN, Thürlimann B, Mouridsen H, Mauriac L, Forbes JF, Paridaens RJ, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Colleoni M, Láng I, Del Mastro L, Gladieff L, Rabaglio M, Smith IE, Chirgwin JH, Goldhirsch A. Letrozole compared with tamoxifen for elderly patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):1972-9. Epub 2008 Mar 10. link to original article PubMed
    4. Update: Regan MM, Neven P, Giobbie-Hurder A, Goldhirsch A, Ejlertsen B, Mauriac L, Forbes JF, Smith I, Láng I, Wardley A, Rabaglio M, Price KN, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thürlimann B; BIG; International Breast Cancer Study Group. Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in sequence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical trial at 8·1 years median follow-up. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Nov;12(12):1101-8. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed
    5. Update: Ruhstaller T, Giobbie-Hurder A, Colleoni M, Jensen MB, Ejlertsen B, de Azambuja E, Neven P, Láng I, Jakobsen EH, Gladieff L, Bonnefoi H, Harvey VJ, Spazzapan S, Tondini C, Del Mastro L, Veyret C, Simoncini E, Gianni L, Rochlitz C, Kralidis E, Zaman K, Jassem J, Piccart-Gebhart M, Di Leo A, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A, Thürlimann B, Regan MM; members of the BIG 1-98 Collaborative Group and the International Breast Cancer Study Group. Adjuvant Letrozole and Tamoxifen Alone or Sequentially for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of the BIG 1-98 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 10;37(2):105-114. Epub 2018 Nov 26. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

CALGB 9741

Note: what is referred to in this study as concurrent is in fact the same regimen that is referred to as sequential in other studies. The taxane studied in this trial was paclitaxel.

Arm 1, sequential

  • A x 4, then T q3wk x 4, then C x 4

Arm 2, dose-dense sequential

Arm 3, "concurrent"

Arm 4, dose-dense "concurrent"

Comparative efficacy

  • Analyzed using a 2 x 2 factorial design

Comparison 1

Dose density Efficacy
Dose-dense (q2wk) Seems to have superior OS
Standard (q3wk) Seems to have inferior OS

Comparison 2

Schedule Efficacy
Concurrent Seems not superior
Sequential Seems not superior

References

  1. Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1431-9. Epub 2003 Feb 13. link to original article contains dosing details in manuscript PubMed

DBCG 82b

Arm 1 (Experimental)

Arm 2 (Control)

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
With RT Superior OS
Without RT Inferior OS

References

  1. Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, Rose C, Andersson M, Bach F, Kjaer M, Gadeberg CC, Mouridsen HT, Jensen MB, Zedeler K. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b trial. N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 2;337(14):949-55. link to original article PubMed

ECOG E5103

Arm A (Control)

Arm B (Experimental)

  • Surgery, then AC-Bev x 4 or ddAC-Bev x 4, then wP-Bev

Arm C (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Backbone Efficacy
No bevacizumab Seems not superior
With bevacizumab Seems not superior

References

  1. Miller KD, O'Neill A, Gradishar W, Hobday TJ, Goldstein LJ, Mayer IA, Bloom S, Brufsky AM, Tevaarwerk AJ, Sparano JA, Le-Lindqwister NA, Hendricks CB, Northfelt DW, Dang CT, Sledge GW Jr. Double-blind phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab in patients with lymph node-positive and high-risk lymph node-negative breast cancer (E5103). J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;36(25):2621-2629. Epub 2018 Jul 24. link to original article PubMed

ECTO

Arm A (Control)

Arm B (Experimental)

Arm C (Experimental)

  • AT (Taxol) x 4, then CMF x 4, then surgery

Comparative efficacy

Comparison 1

Paclitaxel Efficacy
Included Seems to have superior RFS
Not included Seems to have inferior RFS

Comparison 2

Timing Efficacy
Adjuvant AT-CMF Seems not superior
Neoadjuvant AT-CMF Seems not superior

References

  1. Gianni L, Baselga J, Eiermann W, Porta VG, Semiglazov V, Lluch A, Zambetti M, Sabadell D, Raab G, Cussac AL, Bozhok A, Martinez-Agulló A, Greco M, Byakhov M, Lopez JJ, Mansutti M, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G. Phase III trial evaluating the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, as adjuvant or primary systemic therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20;27(15):2474-81. Epub 2009 Mar 30. link to original article PubMed

FATA-GIM3

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Comparative efficacy

Approach Efficacy
AI x 5 y Seems not superior
Tamoxifen x 2 y, then AI x 3 y Seems not superior

References

  1. De Placido S, Gallo C, De Laurentiis M, Bisagni G, Arpino G, Sarobba MG, Riccardi F, Russo A, Del Mastro L, Cogoni AA, Cognetti F, Gori S, Foglietta J, Frassoldati A, Amoroso D, Laudadio L, Moscetti L, Montemurro F, Verusio C, Bernardo A, Lorusso V, Gravina A, Moretti G, Lauria R, Lai A, Mocerino C, Rizzo S, Nuzzo F, Carlini P, Perrone F; GIM Investigators. Adjuvant anastrozole versus exemestane versus letrozole, upfront or after 2 years of tamoxifen, in endocrine-sensitive breast cancer (FATA-GIM3): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):474-485. Epub 2018 Feb 23. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):e184. link to original article PubMed

GeparQuinto

Arm 1A - Control (HER2-negative)

Arm 1B - Control (HER2-positive)

Arm 2A - Experimental (HER2-negative)

Arm 2B - Experimental (HER2-positive)

  • ECL x 4, then TL (Taxotere) x 4, then surgery

Comparative efficacy

Comparison 1 (HER2-negative)

Note that while this study met the primary efficacy endpoint, the advantage for bevacizumab was only seen in the triple-negative breast cancer patients, with p=0.003 in this subgroup.

Regimen Efficacy
No bevacizumab Seems to have inferior pCR rate
With bevacizumab Seems to have superior pCR rate

Comparison 2 (HER2-positive)

Regimen Efficacy
With lapatinib Seems to have inferior pCR rate
With trastuzumab Seems to have superior pCR rate

References

  1. von Minckwitz G, Eidtmann H, Rezai M, Fasching PA, Tesch H, Eggemann H, Schrader I, Kittel K, Hanusch C, Kreienberg R, Solbach C, Gerber B, Jackisch C, Kunz G, Blohmer JU, Huober J, Hauschild M, Fehm T, Müller BM, Denkert C, Loibl S, Nekljudova V, Untch M; German Breast Group; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie–Breast Study Groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab for HER2-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 26;366(4):299-309. link to original article PubMed
  2. Untch M, Loibl S, Bischoff J, Eidtmann H, Kaufmann M, Blohmer JU, Hilfrich J, Strumberg D, Fasching PA, Kreienberg R, Tesch H, Hanusch C, Gerber B, Rezai M, Jackisch C, Huober J, Kühn T, Nekljudova V, von Minckwitz G; GBG; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie-Breast (AGO-B) Study Group. Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):135-44. Epub 2012 Jan 17. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Untch M, von Minckwitz G, Gerber B, Schem C, Rezai M, Fasching PA, Tesch H, Eggemann H, Hanusch C, Huober J, Solbach C, Jackisch C, Kunz G, Blohmer JU, Hauschild M, Fehm T, Nekljudova V, Loibl S; GBG and the AGO-B Study Group. Survival analysis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab or lapatinib in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in the GeparQuinto (G5) study (GBG 44). J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 1;36(13):1308-1316. Epub 2018 Mar 15. link to original article PubMed

GROCTA-1

Arm 1, CT (Experimental)

Arm 2, T (Experimental)

Arm 3, CTT (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Note: reported efficacy is based on the 2011 update.

Comparison 1

Regimen Efficacy
T Seems to have superior OS
CT Seems to have inferior OS

Comparison 2

Regimen Efficacy
CTT Superior OS
CT Inferior OS

References

  1. Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Bruzzi P, Cappellini M, Isola G, Nenci I, Piffanelli A, Scanni A, Sismondi P, Santi L, Genta F, Saccani F, Sassi M, Malacarne P, Donati D, Farris A, Castagnetta L, Di Carlo A, Traina A, Galletto L, Smerieri F, Buzzi F; Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemo-Hormone Therapy Cooperative Group. Chemotherapy versus tamoxifen versus chemotherapy plus tamoxifen in node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: results of a multicentric Italian study. J Clin Oncol. 1990 Aug;8(8):1310-20. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Boccardo F, Guglielmini P, Parodi A, Rubagotti A. Chemotherapy versus tamoxifen versus chemotherapy plus tamoxifen in node-positive, oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: very late results of the 'gruppo di ricerca per la chemio-ormonoterapia adiuvante (GROCTA)' 01-Trial in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Apr;126(3):653-61. Epub 2011 Feb 24. link to original article PubMed

HE 10/97

Arm 1 (Experimental)

  • Surgery, then ddE x 3, then T x 3, then intensified CMF x 3

Arm 2 (Control)

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Experimental arm (with taxane) Did not meet primary endpoint of DFS
Control arm Did not meet primary endpoint of DFS

References

  1. Fountzilas G, Skarlos D, Dafni U, Gogas H, Briasoulis E, Pectasides D, Papadimitriou C, Markopoulos C, Polychronis A, Kalofonos HP, Siafaka V, Kosmidis P, Timotheadou E, Tsavdaridis D, Bafaloukos D, Papakostas P, Razis E, Makrantonakis P, Aravantinos G, Christodoulou C, Dimopoulos AM. Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, followed by CMF with or without paclitaxel, in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer: a randomized phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol. 2005 Nov;16(11):1762-71. Epub 2005 Sep 7. link to original article PubMed

IES

IES: Intergroup Exemestane Study

Arm 1, monotherapy (Control)

Arm 2, sequential (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Note: reported efficacy is based on the 2011 update.

Regimen Efficacy
Tamoxifen x 5y Seems to have inferior OS
Tamoxifen x 2-3y, then Exemestane x 2-3y (5y total) Seems to have superior OS

References

  1. Coombes RC, Hall E, Gibson LJ, Paridaens R, Jassem J, Delozier T, Jones SE, Alvarez I, Bertelli G, Ortmann O, Coates AS, Bajetta E, Dodwell D, Coleman RE, Fallowfield LJ, Mickiewicz E, Andersen J, Lønning PE, Cocconi G, Stewart A, Stuart N, Snowdon CF, Carpentieri M, Massimini G, Bliss JM, van de Velde C; Intergroup Exemestane Study. A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 11;350(11):1081-92. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Coombes RC, Kilburn LS, Snowdon CF, Paridaens R, Coleman RE, Jones SE, Jassem J, Van de Velde CJ, Delozier T, Alvarez I, Del Mastro L, Ortmann O, Diedrich K, Coates AS, Bajetta E, Holmberg SB, Dodwell D, Mickiewicz E, Andersen J, Lønning PE, Cocconi G, Forbes J, Castiglione M, Stuart N, Stewart A, Fallowfield LJ, Bertelli G, Hall E, Bogle RG, Carpentieri M, Colajori E, Subar M, Ireland E, Bliss JM; Intergroup Exemestane Study. Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2-3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 17;369(9561):559-70. link to original article PubMed
    2. Update: Bliss JM, Kilburn LS, Coleman RE, Forbes JF, Coates AS, Jones SE, Jassem J, Delozier T, Andersen J, Paridaens R, van de Velde CJ, Lønning PE, Morden J, Reise J, Cisar L, Menschik T, Coombes RC. Disease-related outcomes with long-term follow-up: an updated analysis of the Intergroup Exemestane Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 1;30(7):709-17. Epub 2011 Oct 31. link to original article PubMed

IMpassion031

Arm 1 (Control)

Arm 2 (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Comparative Efficacy
Control (no ICI) Inferior pCR rate
Experimental (+ ICI) Superior pCR rate

References

  1. IMpassion031: Mittendorf EA, Zhang H, Barrios CH, Saji S, Jung KH, Hegg R, Koehler A, Sohn J, Iwata H, Telli ML, Ferrario C, Punie K, Penault-Llorca F, Patel S, Duc AN, Liste-Hermoso M, Maiya V, Molinero L, Chui SY, Harbeck N. Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in combination with sequential nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy versus placebo and chemotherapy in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion031): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1090-1100. Epub 2020 Sep 18. link to original article PubMed

KEYNOTE-522

Arm 1, control

Arm 2, experimental

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Control arm Inferior pCR rate
Pembrolizumab arm Superior pCR rate

References

  1. Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Bergh J, Denkert C, Park YH, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Foukakis T, Fasching PA, Cardoso F, Untch M, Jia L, Karantza V, Zhao J, Aktan G, Dent R, O'Shaughnessy J; KEYNOTE-522 Investigators. Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 27;382(9):810-821. link to original article PubMed

Kümmel et al. 2006

Arm 1, control

Arm 2, experimental

  • Surgery, then ddEP x 4, then ddCMF x 3

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
EC-CMF Might have inferior OS
ddEP-ddCMF Might have superior OS

References

  1. Kümmel S, Krocker J, Kohls A, Breitbach GP, Morack G, Budner M, Blohmer JU, Elling D. Randomised trial: survival benefit and safety of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006 May 8;94(9):1237-44. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed
    1. Update: Reinisch M, Gluz O, Ataseven B, Blohmer JU, Budner M, Dittmer-Grabowski C, Kohls A, Krocker J, Kümmel A, Hagemann F, Rüland A, Traut A, Kümmel S. Updated Survival Analysis after a Median Follow-up of 12 Years of an Anthracycline-Containing Adjuvant Prospective Multicentre, Randomised Phase III Trial on Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Primary Node-Positive, High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Care (Basel). 2019 Jun;14(3):159-164. Epub 2018 Sep 5. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

Loesch et al. 2010

Arm 1, control

Arm 2, experimental

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
AC-P Seems not superior
AP-WP Seems not superior

References

  1. Loesch D, Greco FA, Senzer NN, Burris HA, Hainsworth JD, Jones S, Vukelja SJ, Sandbach J, Holmes F, Sedlacek S, Pippen J, Lindquist D, McIntyre K, Blum JL, Modiano MR, Boehm KA, Zhan F, Asmar L, Robert N. Phase III multicenter trial of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel compared with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for women with high-risk breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 20;28(18):2958-65. Epub 2010 May 17. link to original article PubMed

Mavroudis et al. 2017

Arm 1, sequential

Arm 2, concurrent

  • Surgery, then Docetaxel & Epirubicin

Comparative efficacy

Schedule Efficacy
Sequential Might have superior DFS
Concurrent Might have inferior DFS

References

  1. Mavroudis D, Saloustros E, Boukovinas I, Papakotoulas P, Kakolyris S, Ziras N, Christophylakis C, Kentepozidis N, Fountzilas G, Rigas G, Varthalitis I, Kalbakis K, Agelaki S, Hatzidaki D, Georgoulias V. Sequential vs concurrent epirubicin and docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk, node-negative, early breast cancer: an interim analysis of a randomised phase III study from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group. Br J Cancer. 2017 Jul 11;117(2):164-170. Epub 2017 Jun 22. link to original article contains dosing details in manuscript link to PMC article PubMed

Milan trial

Arm 1 (Experimental)

Arm 2 (Experimental)

  • Surgery, then A alternating with CMF every 2 cycles (12 cycles total)

Comparative efficacy

Approach Efficacy
Sequential Superior OS
Alternating Inferior OS

References

  1. Buzzoni R, Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Zambetti M. Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in the treatment of resectable breast cancer with more than three positive axillary nodes. J Clin Oncol. 1991 Dec;9(12):2134-40. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Bonadonna G, Zambetti M, Valagussa P. Sequential or alternating doxorubicin and CMF regimens in breast cancer with more than three positive nodes: ten-year results. JAMA. 1995 Feb 15;273(7):542-7. link to original article PubMed

NeoALTTO

Arm 1, trastuzumab (C)

Arm 1, lapatinib (E)

Arm 3, lapatinib & trastuzumab (E)

Comparative efficacy

The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Comparison was only between experimental and control arms (i.e., 2 comparisons).

Backbone Efficacy
Trastuzumab vs. Lapatinib Seems not superior
Trastuzumab vs. Lapatinib & Trastuzumab Inferior pCR rate
Lapatinib vs. Trastuzumab Seems not superior
Lapatinib & Trastuzumab vs. Trastuzumab Superior pCR rate

References

  1. Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H, Di Cosimo S, de Azambuja E, Aura C, Gómez H, Dinh P, Fauria K, Van Dooren V, Aktan G, Goldhirsch A, Chang TW, Horváth Z, Coccia-Portugal M, Domont J, Tseng LM, Kunz G, Sohn JH, Semiglazov V, Lerzo G, Palacova M, Probachai V, Pusztai L, Untch M, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M; NeoALTTO Study Team. Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):633-40. Epub 2012 Jan 17. Erratum in: Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):616. Dosage error in published abstract; MEDLINE/PubMed abstract corrected. link to original article link to PMC article contains dosing details in manuscript PubMed
    1. Update: de Azambuja E, Holmes AP, Piccart-Gebhart M, Holmes E, Di Cosimo S, Swaby RF, Untch M, Jackisch C, Lang I, Smith I, Boyle F, Xu B, Barrios CH, Perez EA, Azim HA Jr, Kim SB, Kuemmel S, Huang CS, Vuylsteke P, Hsieh RK, Gorbunova V, Eniu A, Dreosti L, Tavartkiladze N, Gelber RD, Eidtmann H, Baselga J. Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): survival outcomes of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial and their association with pathological complete response. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1137-46. Epub 2014 Aug 14. link to original article PubMed

NOAH

Arm 1, no trastuzumab (Control)

  • AT (Taxol) x 3, then T (Taxol) x 3, then CMF x 3, then surgery

Arm 2, with trastuzumab (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Sequencing Efficacy
With trastuzumab Seems to have superior EFS
No trastuzumab Seems to have inferior EFS

References

  1. Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, Manikhas A, Lluch A, Tjulandin S, Zambetti M, Vazquez F, Byakhow M, Lichinitser M, Climent MA, Ciruelos E, Ojeda B, Mansutti M, Bozhok A, Baronio R, Feyereislova A, Barton C, Valagussa P, Baselga J. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010 Jan 30;375(9712):377-84. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, Lluch A, Tjulandin S, Zambetti M, Moliterni A, Vazquez F, Byakhov MJ, Lichinitser M, Climent MA, Ciruelos E, Ojeda B, Mansutti M, Bozhok A, Magazzù D, Heinzmann D, Steinseifer J, Valagussa P, Baselga J. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (NOAH): follow-up of a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):640-7. Epub 2014 Mar 20. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):e667. link to original article PubMed

NSABP B-38

Arm 1, sequential without gemcitabine (Control)

Arm 2, sequential with gemcitabine (Experimental)

Arm 3, concurrent

Comparative efficacy

Schedule Efficacy
Sequential (ddAC, then ddP) Seems not superior
Sequential (ddAC, then ddPG) Seems not superior
Concurrent (TAC) Seems not superior

References

  1. Swain SM, Tang G, Geyer CE Jr, Rastogi P, Atkins JN, Donnellan PP, Fehrenbacher L, Azar CA, Robidoux A, Polikoff JA, Brufsky AM, Biggs DD, Levine EA, Zapas JL, Provencher L, Northfelt DW, Paik S, Costantino JP, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 10;31(26):3197-204. Epub 2013 Aug 12. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

PREPARE

Arm 1, control

Arm 2, experimental

  • ddE x 3, then ddT (Taxol) x 3, then CMF x 3, then surgery

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Control Seems not superior
Experimental Seems not superior

References

  1. Untch M, von Minckwitz G, Konecny GE, Conrad U, Fett W, Kurzeder C, Lück HJ, Stickeler E, Urbaczyk H, Liedtke B, Beckmann MW, Salat C, Harbeck N, Müller V, Schmidt M, Hasmüller S, Lenhard M, Nekljudova V, Lebeau A, Loibl S, Fasching PA; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie PREPARE investigators. PREPARE trial: a randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative, dose-dense, dose-intensified chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and CMF versus a standard-dosed epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without darbepoetin alfa in primary breast cancer--outcome on prognosis. Ann Oncol. 2011 Sep;22(9):1999-2006. Epub 2011 Mar 7. link to original article PubMed

Recht et al. 1996

Arm 1, chemo first

Arm 2, RT first

Comparative efficacy

anti-HER2 medication Comparative Efficacy
Chemo first Seems to have superior MFS
RT first Seems to have inferior MFS

References

  1. Recht A, Come SE, Henderson IC, Gelman RS, Silver B, Hayes DF, Shulman LN, Harris JR. The sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996 May 23;334(21):1356-61. link to original article PubMed

SBG 9401

Arm 1 (control)

Arm 2 (experimental)

  • Tailored FEC x 6

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Control Seems to have inferior RFS
Experimental Seems to have superior RFS

References

  1. Bergh J, Wiklund T, Erikstein B, Lidbrink E, Lindman H, Malmström P, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Bengtsson NO, Söderlund G, Anker G, Wist E, Ottosson S, Salminen E, Ljungman P, Holte H, Nilsson J, Blomqvist C, Wilking N; Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study. Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000 Oct 21;356(9239):1384-91. Erratum in: Lancet 2000 Dec 23-30;356(9248):2196. link to original article PubMed

SWOG-8814

Arm 1 (Control)

Arm 2, CAF-T (Experimental)

Arm 3, CAFT (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Comparison 1

Design Efficacy
No chemotherapy Might have inferior OS
With chemotherapy Might have superior OS

Comparison 2

Timing Efficacy
Concurrent (CAFT) Might have inferior DFS
Sequential (CAF-T) Might have superior DFS

References

  1. Albain KS, Barlow WE, Ravdin PM, Farrar WB, Burton GV, Ketchel SJ, Cobau CD, Levine EG, Ingle JN, Pritchard KI, Lichter AS, Schneider DJ, Abeloff MD, Henderson IC, Muss HB, Green SJ, Lew D, Livingston RB, Martino S, Osborne CK; Breast Cancer Intergroup of North America. Adjuvant chemotherapy and timing of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Dec 19;374(9707):2055-2063. Epub 2009 Dec 10. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

TACT2

Arm 1 (Experimental)

Arm 2 (Experimental)

Arm 3 (Experimental)

Arm 4 (Control)

Comparative efficacy

  • Analyzed using a 2 x 2 factorial design

Comparison 1

Dose density of epirubicin Efficacy
Dose-dense (q2wk) Seems not superior
Standard (q3wk) Seems not superior

Comparison 2

Capecitabine vs. CMF Efficacy
Capecitabine Non-inferior TTR
CMF Non-inferior TTR

References

  1. Cameron D, Morden JP, Canney P, Velikova G, Coleman R, Bartlett J, Agrawal R, Banerji J, Bertelli G, Bloomfield D, Brunt AM, Earl H, Ellis P, Gaunt C, Gillman A, Hearfield N, Laing R, Murray N, Couper N, Stein RC, Verrill M, Wardley A, Barrett-Lee P, Bliss JM; TACT2 Investigators. Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the randomised UK TACT2 trial (CRUK/05/19): a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):929-945. Epub 2017 Jun 7. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

TEAM

Arm 1, monotherapy (Control)

Arm 2, sequential (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Tamoxifen x 5y Seems not superior
Tamoxifen x 2.5-3y, then Exemestane x 2-2.5y Seems not superior

References

  1. van de Velde CJ, Rea D, Seynaeve C, Putter H, Hasenburg A, Vannetzel JM, Paridaens R, Markopoulos C, Hozumi Y, Hille ET, Kieback DG, Asmar L, Smeets J, Nortier JW, Hadji P, Bartlett JM, Jones SE. Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in early breast cancer (TEAM): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011 Jan 22;377(9762):321-31. link to original article contains dosing details in manuscript PubMed
    1. Update: Derks MGM, Blok EJ, Seynaeve C, Nortier JWR, Kranenbarg EM, Liefers GJ, Putter H, Kroep JR, Rea D, Hasenburg A, Markopoulos C, Paridaens R, Smeets JBE, Dirix LY, van de Velde CJH. Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in women with postmenopausal early breast cancer (TEAM): 10-year follow-up of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1211-1220. Epub 2017 Jul 18. link to original article PubMed

TRYPHAENA

Arm A

Arm B

Arm C

Comparative efficacy

Note: this was a cardiac safety study; efficacy findings are not reported.

References

  1. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, Harvey V, Eniu A, Hegg R, Tausch C, Seo JH, Tsai YF, Ratnayake J, McNally V, Ross G, Cortés J. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2278-84. Epub 2013 May 22. link to original article PubMed

Cervical cancer

NOGGO-AGO

Arm 1 (Control)

Arm 2 (Experimental)

  • Surgery, then adjuvant Carboplatin, Ifosfamide, Erythropoietin alfa, then EBRT & Erythropoietin alfa

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
No EPO Might have inferior RFS
With EPO Might have superior RFS

References

  1. Blohmer JU, Paepke S, Sehouli J, Boehmer D, Kolben M, Würschmidt F, Petry KU, Kimmig R, Elling D, Thomssen C, von Minckwitz G, Möbus V, Hinke A, Kümmel S, Budach V, Lichtenegger W, Schmid P. Randomized phase III trial of sequential adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without erythropoietin Alfa in patients with high-risk cervical cancer: results of the NOGGO-AGO intergroup study. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 1;29(28):3791-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22. link to original article PubMed

Colorectal cancer

CAIRO

Arm 1, sequential single agent (Control)

Arm 2, sequential combinations (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Approach Efficacy
Sequential single agent Seems not superior
Sequential combinations Seems not superior

References

  1. Koopman M, Antonini NF, Douma J, Wals J, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FL, de Jong RS, Rodenburg CJ, Vreugdenhil G, Loosveld OJ, van Bochove A, Sinnige HA, Creemers GM, Tesselaar ME, Slee PHTJ, Werter MJ, Mol L, Dalesio O, Punt CJ. Sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer (CAIRO): a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):135-142. link to original article PubMed

FFCD 2000-05

Arm 1, sequential (Control)

Arm 2, combination (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Approach Efficacy Toxicity
Sequential Seems not superior Less toxic
Combination Seems not superior More toxic

References

  1. Ducreux M, Malka D, Mendiboure J, Etienne PL, Texereau P, Auby D, Rougier P, Gasmi M, Castaing M, Abbas M, Michel P, Gargot D, Azzedine A, Lombard-Bohas C, Geoffroy P, Denis B, Pignon JP, Bedenne L, Bouché O; Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 2000–05 Collaborative Group. Sequential versus combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (FFCD 2000-05): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):1032-44. Epub 2011 Sep 6. link to original article PubMed

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

SWOG S8736

Arm 1 - Control

Arm 2 - Experimental

  • CHOP x 3, then RT x 40 to 55 Gy

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
CHOP x 8 Seems to have inferior OS
CHOP x 3, then RT Seems to have superior OS

References

  1. Miller TP, Dahlberg S, Cassady JR, Adelstein DJ, Spier CM, Grogan TM, LeBlanc M, Carlin S, Chase E, Fisher RI. Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 2;339(1):21-6. link to original article PubMed

Endometrial cancer

PORTEC-3

Arm 1 - Control

Arm 2 - Experimental

Comparative efficacy

Modality Efficacy
Radiotherapy Seems to have inferior OS1
Chemoradiotherapy Seems to have superior OS1

1Reported efficacy is based on the 2019 update.

References

  1. de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, Katsaros D, Bessette P, Haie-Meder C, Ottevanger PB, Ledermann JA, Khaw P, Colombo A, Fyles A, Baron MH, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Kitchener HC, Nijman HW, Wilson G, Brooks S, Carinelli S, Provencher D, Hanzen C, Lutgens LCHW, Smit VTHBM, Singh N, Do V, D'Amico R, Nout RA, Feeney A, Verhoeven-Adema KW, Putter H, Creutzberg CL; PORTEC study group. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):295-309. Epub 2018 Feb 12. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed
    1. Update: de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, Katsaros D, Bessette P, Haie-Meder C, Ottevanger PB, Ledermann JA, Khaw P, D'Amico R, Fyles A, Baron MH, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Kitchener HC, Nijman HW, Wilson G, Brooks S, Gribaudo S, Provencher D, Hanzen C, Kruitwagen RF, Smit VTHBM, Singh N, Do V, Lissoni A, Nout RA, Feeney A, Verhoeven-Adema KW, Putter H, Creutzberg CL; PORTEC Study Group. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1273-1285. Epub 2019 Jul 22. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2019 Sep;20(9):e468. link to original article PubMed

Follicular lymphoma

GALLIUM

Arm 1 - Control

Arm 2 - Experimental

Comparative efficacy

mAb Efficacy Toxicity
Rituximab-chemotherapy Inferior PFS Superior toxicity
Obinutuzumab-chemotherapy Superior PFS
PFS36: 80% vs 73%
(HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.85) 		Inferior toxicity

References

  1. Marcus R, Davies A, Ando K, Klapper W, Opat S, Owen C, Phillips E, Sangha R, Schlag R, Seymour JF, Townsend W, Trněný M, Wenger M, Fingerle-Rowson G, Rufibach K, Moore T, Herold M, Hiddemann W. Obinutuzumab for the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1331-1344. link to original article link to appendix PubMed

Gastroesophageal cancer

POET

Arm 1

Arm 2

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy only Might have inferior OS
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy Might have superior OS

References

  1. Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Langer P, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Bitzer M, Königsrainer A, Budach W, Wilke H. Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):851-6. Epub 2009 Jan 12. link to original article PubMed

PRODIGE5/ACCORD17

Arm 1 - Control

Arm 2 - Experimental

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
CF-based Seems not superior
FOLFOX4-based Seems not superior

References

  1. Conroy T, Galais MP, Raoul JL, Bouché O, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Douillard JY, Etienne PL, Boige V, Martel-Lafay I, Michel P, Llacer-Moscardo C, François E, Créhange G, Abdelghani MB, Juzyna B, Bedenne L, Adenis A; Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive and UNICANCER-GI Group. Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):305-14. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2014 Dec;15(13):e587. link to original article PubMed

Glioblastoma

AVAglio

Arm 1, control

Arm 2, experimental

  • Surgery, then adjuvant temozolomide, bevacizumab, RT, then temozolomide & bevacizumab maintenance, then bevacizumab maintenance

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Temozolomide alone Inferior PFS
Bevacizumab-containing arm Superior PFS

References

  1. Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W, Henriksson R, Saran F, Nishikawa R, Carpentier AF, Hoang-Xuan K, Kavan P, Cernea D, Brandes AA, Hilton M, Abrey L, Cloughesy T. Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):709-22. link to original article PubMed

EORTC 22981/26981; NCIC-CTG CE.3

Arm 1, control

Arm 2, experimental

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Radiotherapy alone Inferior OS
Temozolomide-containing arm Superior OS

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO; EORTC Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96. link to original article PubMed

RTOG 0825

Arm 1, control

Arm 2, experimental

  • Surgery, then adjuvant Temozolomide, Bevacizumab, RT, then Temozolomide & Bevacizumab maintenance

Comparative efficacy

Note: although the control regimen had inferior PFS, the effect size did not reach the prespecified improvement target.

Regimen Efficacy
Temozolomide alone Inferior PFS
Bevacizumab-containing arm Superior PFS

References

  1. Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Blumenthal DT, Vogelbaum MA, Colman H, Chakravarti A, Pugh S, Won M, Jeraj R, Brown PD, Jaeckle KA, Schiff D, Stieber VW, Brachman DG, Werner-Wasik M, Tremont-Lukats IW, Sulman EP, Aldape KD, Curran WJ Jr, Mehta MP. A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):699-708. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

Head and neck cancer

EORTC 24954

Arm 1, control

Arm 2, experimental

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Sequential RT Seems not superior
Alternating RT Seems not superior

References

  1. Lefebvre JL, Rolland F, Tesselaar M, Bardet E, Leemans CR, Geoffrois L, Hupperets P, Barzan L, de Raucourt D, Chevalier D, Licitra L, Lunghi F, Stupp R, Lacombe D, Bogaerts J, Horiot JC, Bernier J, Vermorken JB; EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group; EORTC Radiation Oncology Group. Phase 3 randomized trial on larynx preservation comparing sequential vs alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Feb 4;101(3):142-52. Epub 2009 Jan 27. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

RTOG 91-11

Arm 1, induction chemotherapy, then radiotherapy (Control)

Arm 2, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (Experimental)

Arm 3, radiotherapy (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Efficacy is based on the 2012 update.

Regimen vs. Arm 1 Arm 2 Arm 3
Arm 1 vs. Inferior LFS Seems to have superior LFS
Arm 2 vs. Superior LFS Seems to have superior LFS
Arm 3 vs. Seems to have inferior LFS Seems to have inferior LFS

References

  1. Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, Pajak TF, Weber R, Morrison W, Glisson B, Trotti A, Ridge JA, Chao C, Peters G, Lee DJ, Leaf A, Ensley J, Cooper J. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2091-8. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Forastiere AA, Zhang Q, Weber RS, Maor MH, Goepfert H, Pajak TF, Morrison W, Glisson B, Trotti A, Ridge JA, Thorstad W, Wagner H, Ensley JF, Cooper JS. Long-term results of RTOG 91-11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with locally advanced larynx cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 1;31(7):845-52. Epub 2012 Nov 26. link to original article contains partial protocol link to PMC article PubMed

Hodgkin lymphoma

EORTC 20012

Arm 1

Arm 2

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
BEACOPP4+4 Did not meet primary endpoint of EFS
ABVD x 8 Did not meet primary endpoint of EFS

References

  1. Carde P, Karrasch M, Fortpied C, Brice P, Khaled H, Casasnovas O, Caillot D, Gaillard I, Bologna S, Ferme C, Lugtenburg PJ, Morschhauser F, Aurer I, Coiffier B, Meyer R, Seftel M, Wolf M, Glimelius B, Sureda A, Mounier N. Eight cycles of ABVD versus four cycles of BEACOPPescalated plus four cycles of BEACOPPbaseline in stage III to IV, International Prognostic Score ≥ 3, high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma: First results of the phase III EORTC 20012 Intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 10;34(17):2028-36. Epub 2016 Apr 25. link to original article contains dosing details in manuscript PubMed

EORTC-GELA H8-F

Arm 1

Arm 2

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
MOPP-ABV x 3, then IFRT Superior OS
STNI Inferior OS

References

  1. Fermé C, Eghbali H, Meerwaldt JH, Rieux C, Bosq J, Berger F, Girinsky T, Brice P, van't Veer MB, Walewski JA, Lederlin P, Tirelli U, Carde P, Van den Neste E, Gyan E, Monconduit M, Diviné M, Raemaekers JM, Salles G, Noordijk EM, Creemers GJ, Gabarre J, Hagenbeek A, Reman O, Blanc M, Thomas J, Vié B, Kluin-Nelemans JC, Viseu F, Baars JW, Poortmans P, Lugtenburg PJ, Carrie C, Jaubert J, Henry-Amar M; EORTC; GELA. Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation in early-stage Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 8;357(19):1916-27. link to original article contains dosing details in supplement PubMed

EORTC-GELA H8-U

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Comparative efficacy

Note: the paper describes this as an equivalence study, although the primary endpoint of EFS had p=0.80.

Regimen Efficacy
MOPP-ABV x 4, then IFRT Inconclusive whether equivalent
MOPP-ABV x 4, then STNI Inconclusive whether equivalent
MOPP-ABV x 6, then IFRT Inconclusive whether equivalent

References

  1. Fermé C, Eghbali H, Meerwaldt JH, Rieux C, Bosq J, Berger F, Girinsky T, Brice P, van't Veer MB, Walewski JA, Lederlin P, Tirelli U, Carde P, Van den Neste E, Gyan E, Monconduit M, Diviné M, Raemaekers JM, Salles G, Noordijk EM, Creemers GJ, Gabarre J, Hagenbeek A, Reman O, Blanc M, Thomas J, Vié B, Kluin-Nelemans JC, Viseu F, Baars JW, Poortmans P, Lugtenburg PJ, Carrie C, Jaubert J, Henry-Amar M; EORTC-GELA H8 Trial. Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation in early-stage Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 8;357(19):1916-27. link to original article contains dosing details in supplement PubMed

EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10

Note: randomization in this trial occurred before treatment, but took effect after 2 cycles of ABVD, and only if interim PET-CT was negative.

Arm 1

  • Favorable: ABVD x 4
  • Unfavorable: ABVD x 6

Arm 2

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
ABVD x 4 Inconclusive whether non-inferior
ABVD x 3, then INRT Inconclusive whether non-inferior

References

  1. Raemaekers JM, André MP, Federico M, Girinsky T, Oumedaly R, Brusamolino E, Brice P, Fermé C, van der Maazen R, Gotti M, Bouabdallah R, Sebban CJ, Lievens Y, Re A, Stamatoullas A, Morschhauser F, Lugtenburg PJ, Abruzzese E, Olivier P, Casasnovas RO, van Imhoff G, Raveloarivahy T, Bellei M, van der Borght T, Bardet S, Versari A, Hutchings M, Meignan M, Fortpied C. Omitting radiotherapy in early positron emission tomography-negative stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma is associated with an increased risk of early relapse: Clinical results of the preplanned interim analysis of the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 20;32(12):1188-94. Epub 2014 Mar 17. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: André MPE, Girinsky T, Federico M, Reman O, Fortpied C, Gotti M, Casasnovas O, Brice P, van der Maazen R, Re A, Edeline V, Fermé C, van Imhoff G, Merli F, Bouabdallah R, Sebban C, Specht L, Stamatoullas A, Delarue R, Fiaccadori V, Bellei M, Raveloarivahy T, Versari A, Hutchings M, Meignan M, Raemaekers J. Early positron emission tomography response-adapted treatment in stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma: final results of the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;35(16):1786-1794. Epub 2017 Mar 14. link to original article PubMed

GHSG HD11

Note: the primary endpoints of this trial, which were to determine the superiority of BEACOPP vs. ABVD and noninferiority of 20 Gy vs. 30 Gy of IFRT, were not reported in the manuscript.

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Comparative efficacy

  • Designed using a 2 x 2 factorial design

Comparison 1

Chemotherapy Efficacy
ABVD Not reported
BEACOPP Not reported

Comparison 2

Radiotherapy Efficacy
IFRT x 20 Gy Not reported
IFRT x 30 Gy Not reported

References

  1. Eich HT, Diehl V, Görgen H, Pabst T, Markova J, Debus J, Ho A, Dörken B, Rank A, Grosu AL, Wiegel T, Karstens JH, Greil R, Willich N, Schmidberger H, Döhner H, Borchmann P, Müller-Hermelink HK, Müller RP, Engert A. Intensified chemotherapy and dose-reduced involved-field radiotherapy in patients with early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma: final analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD11 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4199-206. Epub 2010 Aug 16. link to original article PubMed

GHSG HD12

Arm 1

  • eBEACOPP x 8, then ISRT x 30 Gy for patients with initial bulky disease or residual disease

Arm 2

Arm 3

  • eBEACOPP x 4, then BEACOPP x 4, then ISRT x 30 Gy for patients with initial bulky disease or residual disease

Arm 4

Comparative efficacy

  • Designed using a 2 x 2 factorial design

Comparison 1

Chemotherapy Efficacy
eBEACOPP x 8 Non-inferior OS1
eBEACOPP x 4, then BEACOPP x 4 Non-inferior OS1

1Reported efficacy is based on the 2018 update.

Comparison 2

Radiotherapy Efficacy
ISRT x 30 Gy Might have superior 5-year FFTF
No radiotherapy Might have inferior 5-year FFTF

References

  1. Borchmann P, Haverkamp H, Diehl V, Cerny T, Markova J, Ho AD, Eich HT, Mueller-Hermelink HK, Kanz L, Greil R, Rank A, Paulus U, Smardova L, Huber C, Dörken B, Nerl C, Krause SW, Mueller RP, Fuchs M, Engert A. Eight cycles of escalated-dose BEACOPP compared with four cycles of escalated-dose BEACOPP followed by four cycles of baseline-dose BEACOPP with or without radiotherapy in patients with advanced-stage hodgkin's lymphoma: final analysis of the HD12 trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 10;29(32):4234-42. Epub 2011 Oct 11. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: von Tresckow B, Kreissl S, Dipl-Math HG, Bröckelmann PJ, Pabst T, Fridrik M, Rummel M, Jung W, Thiemer J, Sasse S, Bürkle C, Baues C, Diehl V, Engert A, Borchmann P; German Hodgkin Study Group. Intensive treatment strategies in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD9 and HD12): analysis of long-term survival in two randomised trials. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Oct 01;5(10):e462-73. link to original article PubMed

GHSG HD14

Arm 1

Arm 2

Comparative efficacy

Chemotherapy Efficacy
ABVD x 4 Inferior FFTF
eBEACOPP x 2, then ABVD x 2 Superior FFTF

References

  1. von Tresckow B, Plütschow A, Fuchs M, Klimm B, Markova J, Lohri A, Kral Z, Greil R, Topp MS, Meissner J, Zijlstra JM, Soekler M, Stein H, Eich HT, Mueller RP, Diehl V, Borchmann P, Engert A. Dose-intensification in early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma: final analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD14 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 20;30(9):907-13. Epub 2012 Jan 23. link to original article PubMed

GHSG HD17

Arm 1 (Control)

Arm 2 (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Chemotherapy Efficacy
2+2 -> IFRT Non-inferior PFS
PET-guided therapy Non-inferior PFS

References

  1. Borchmann P, Plütschow A, Kobe C, Greil R, Meissner J, Topp MS, Ostermann H, Dierlamm J, Mohm J, Thiemer J, Sökler M, Kerkhoff A, Ahlborn M, Halbsguth TV, Martin S, Keller U, Balabanov S, Pabst T, Vogelhuber M, Hüttmann A, Wilhelm M, Zijlstra JM, Moccia A, Kuhnert G, Bröckelmann PJ, von Tresckow B, Fuchs M, Klimm B, Rosenwald A, Eich H, Baues C, Marnitz S, Hallek M, Diehl V, Dietlein M, Engert A. PET-guided omission of radiotherapy in early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma (GHSG HD17): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):223-234. link to original article PubMed NCT01356680

GSM-HD

Arm 1

Arm 2

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
BEACOPP4+4 Seems to have superior FFFP
ABVD x 8 Seems to have inferior FFFP

References

  1. Viviani S, Zinzani PL, Rambaldi A, Brusamolino E, Levis A, Bonfante V, Vitolo U, Pulsoni A, Liberati AM, Specchia G, Valagussa P, Rossi A, Zaja F, Pogliani EM, Pregno P, Gotti M, Gallamini A, Rota Scalabrini D, Bonadonna G, Gianni AM; Michelangelo Foundation; Gruppo Italiano di Terapie Innovative nei Linfomi; Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi. ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin's lymphoma when high-dose salvage is planned. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 21;365(3):203-12. link to original article PubMed

LYSA H34

Arm 1

Arm 2

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
BEACOPP4+4 Might have superior EFS
ABVD x 8 Might have inferior EFS

References

  1. Mounier N, Brice P, Bologna S, Briere J, Gaillard I, Heczko M, Gabarre J, Casasnovas O, Jaubert J, Colin P, Delmer A, Devidas A, Bachy E, Nicolas-Virelizier E, Aoudjhane A, Humbrecht C, Andre M, Carde P; Lymphoma Study Association. ABVD (8 cycles) versus BEACOPP (4 escalated cycles ≥4 baseline): final results in stage III-IV low-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (IPS 0-2) of the LYSA H34 randomized trial. Ann Oncol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1622-8. Epub 2014 May 14. link to original article contains dosing details in manuscript PubMed

NCIC-CTG/ECOG HD.6

Note: this randomization was for patients with unfavorable risk.

Arm 1

Arm 2

Comparative efficacy

Efficacy is based on the 2011 update.

Regimen Efficacy
ABVD x 4 Seems to have superior OS
ABVD x 2, then STNI Seems to have inferior OS

References

  1. Meyer RM, Gospodarowicz MK, Connors JM, Pearcey RG, Bezjak A, Wells WA, Burns BF, Winter JN, Horning SJ, Dar AR, Djurfeldt MS, Ding K, Shepherd LE; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group; ECOG. Randomized comparison of ABVD chemotherapy with a strategy that includes radiation therapy in patients with limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4634-42. Epub 2005 Apr 18. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Meyer RM, Gospodarowicz MK, Connors JM, Pearcey RG, Wells WA, Winter JN, Horning SJ, Dar AR, Shustik C, Stewart DA, Crump M, Djurfeldt MS, Chen BE, Shepherd LE; NCIC Clinical Trials Group; ECOG. ABVD alone versus radiation-based therapy in limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):399-408. Epub 2011 Dec 11. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

Mantle cell lymphoma

MCL Younger

Arm 1 (Control)

Arm 2 (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
SOC Seems to have inferior TTTF
Cytarabine-based Seems to have superior TTTF

References

  1. Hermine O, Hoster E, Walewski J, Bosly A, Stilgenbauer S, Thieblemont C, Szymczyk M, Bouabdallah R, Kneba M, Hallek M, Salles G, Feugier P, Ribrag V, Birkmann J, Forstpointner R, Haioun C, Hänel M, Casasnovas RO, Finke J, Peter N, Bouabdallah K, Sebban C, Fischer T, Dührsen U, Metzner B, Maschmeyer G, Kanz L, Schmidt C, Delarue R, Brousse N, Klapper W, Macintyre E, Delfau-Larue MH, Pott C, Hiddemann W, Unterhalt M, Dreyling M; European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network. Addition of high-dose cytarabine to immunochemotherapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients aged 65 years or younger with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL Younger): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network. Lancet. 2016 Aug 6;388(10044):565-75. Epub 2016 Jun 14. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: Hermine O, Jiang L, Walewski J, Bosly A, Thieblemont C, Szymczyk M, Pott C, Salles G, Feugier P, Hübel K, Haioun C, Casasnovas RO, Schmidt C, Bouabdallah K, Ribrag V, Kanz L, Dürig J, Metzner B, Sibon D, Cheminant M, Burroni B, Klapper W, Hiddemann W, Unterhalt M, Hoster E, Dreyling M; European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network. High-Dose Cytarabine and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Randomized Mantle Cell Lymphoma Younger Trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):479-484. Epub 2022 Dec 5. link to original article PubMed

Multiple myeloma

HOVON-50

Arm 1 (Control)

Arm 2 (Experimental)

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
SOC Inferior PFS
Thalidomide-based Superior PFS

References

  1. Lokhorst HM, van der Holt B, Zweegman S, Vellenga E, Croockewit S, van Oers MH, von dem Borne P, Wijermans P, Schaafsma R, de Weerdt O, Wittebol S, Delforge M, Berenschot H, Bos GM, Jie KS, Sinnige H, van Marwijk-Kooy M, Joosten P, Minnema MC, van Ammerlaan R, Sonneveld P; Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Group (HOVON). A randomized phase 3 study on the effect of thalidomide combined with adriamycin, dexamethasone, and high-dose melphalan, followed by thalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010 Feb 11;115(6):1113-20. Epub 2009 Oct 30. link to original article PubMed
    1. Update: van de Donk NW, van der Holt B, Minnema MC, Vellenga E, Croockewit S, Kersten MJ, von dem Borne PA, Ypma P, Schaafsma R, de Weerdt O, Klein SK, Delforge M, Levin MD, Bos GM, Jie KG, Sinnige H, Coenen JL, de Waal EG, Zweegman S, Sonneveld P, Lokhorst HM. Thalidomide before and after autologous stem cell transplantation in recently diagnosed multiple myeloma (HOVON-50): long-term results from the phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Oct;5(10):e479-e492. link to original article PubMed

Non-small cell lung cancer

ECOG 3598

Arm 1 (Control)

Arm 2, with thalidomide (Experimental)

  • TPC, then Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Thalidomide, RT

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Without thalidomide Seems not superior
With thalidomide Seems not superior

References

  1. Hoang T, Dahlberg SE, Schiller JH, Mehta MP, Fitzgerald TJ, Belinsky SA, Johnson DH. Randomized phase III study of thoracic radiation in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without thalidomide in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: the ECOG 3598 study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 20;30(6):616-22. Epub 2012 Jan 23. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

IUNO

Arm 1, "early" erlotinib

Arm 2, "late" erlotinib

Comparative efficacy

Timing Efficacy
Maintenance erlotinib Did not meet primary endpoint of OS
Second-line erlotinib Did not meet primary endpoint of OS

References

  1. Cicènas S, Geater SL, Petrov P, Hotko Y, Hooper G, Xia F, Mudie N, Wu YL. Maintenance erlotinib versus erlotinib at disease progression in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who have not progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy (IUNO study). Lung Cancer. 2016 Dec;102:30-37. Epub 2016 Oct 20. link to original article contains dosing details in manuscript PubMed

PRONOUNCE

Arm 1

Arm 2

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Arm 1 Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS
Arm 2 Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS

References

  1. Zinner RG, Obasaju CK, Spigel DR, Weaver RW, Beck JT, Waterhouse DM, Modiano MR, Hrinczenko B, Nikolinakos PG, Liu J, Koustenis AG, Winfree KB, Melemed SA, Guba SC, Ortuzar WI, Desaiah D, Treat JA, Govindan R, Ross HJ. PRONOUNCE: randomized, open-label, phase III study of first-line pemetrexed + carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed versus paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients ith advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jan;10(1):134-42. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

RTOG 9410

Arm 1, sequential

Arm 2, concurrent

Arm 3, concurrent

Comparative efficacy

Schedule Efficacy
Concurrent Seems to have superior OS
Sequential Seems to have inferior OS

References

  1. Curran WJ Jr, Paulus R, Langer CJ, Komaki R, Lee JS, Hauser S, Movsas B, Wasserman T, Rosenthal SA, Gore E, Machtay M, Sause W, Cox JD. Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 5;103(19):1452-60. Epub 2011 Sep 8. Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(1):79. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed

Ovarian cancer

GOG 114

Arm 1 - Control

Arm 2 - Experimental

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Control Seems to have inferior OS
Experimental Seems to have superior OS

References

  1. Markman M, Bundy BN, Alberts DS, Fowler JM, Clark-Pearson DL, Carson LF, Wadler S, Sickel J. Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 15;19(4):1001-7. link to original article PubMed

Pancreatic cancer

GERCOR LAP07

This study had two randomizations; the second only occurred if patients were progression-free after 4 cycles.

Arm 1 - Control

Arm 2 - Experimental

Arm 3 - Experimental

Arm 4 - Experimental

Comparative efficacy

First randomization

Regimen Efficacy
Gemcitabine Might have superior OS
With Erlotinib Might have inferior OS

Second randomization

Modality Efficacy
Chemotherapy Seems not superior
Chemoradiotherapy Seems not superior

References

  1. Hammel P, Huguet F, van Laethem JL, Goldstein D, Glimelius B, Artru P, Borbath I, Bouché O, Shannon J, André T, Mineur L, Chibaudel B, Bonnetain F, Louvet C; LAP07 Trial Group. Effect of chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: The LAP07 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016 May 3;315(17):1844-53. link to original article PubMed

Rectal cancer

CinClare

Arm 1 (Control)

Capecitabine & RT, then CapeOx x 1, then TME, then CapeOx x 5

Arm 2 (Experimental)

Genotype-dosed CAPIRI & RT, then genotype-dosed CAPIRI x 1, then TME, then CapeOx x 5

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
Control Inferior pCR rate
Experimental Superior pCR rate

References

  1. Zhu J, Liu A, Sun X, Liu L, Zhu Y, Zhang T, Jia J, Tan S, Wu J, Wang X, Zhou J, Yang J, Zhang C, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Cai G, Zhang W, Xia F, Wan J, Zhang H, Shen L, Cai S, Zhang Z. Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Capecitabine and Irinotecan Guided by UGT1A1 Status in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 20;38(36):4231-4239. Epub 2020 Oct 29. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed NCT02605265

RAPIDO

Arm 1 (Control)

Capecitabine & RT, then TME, then (per hospital policy) CapeOx x 8 or FOLFOX4 x 12

Arm 2 (Experimental)

RT, then CapeOx x 6 or FOLFOX4 x 9, then TME

Comparative efficacy

Regimen Efficacy
RT, then chemo, then TME Seems to have superior DRTF
Chemo-RT, then TME, +/- adjuvant chemo Seems to have inferior DRTF

References

  1. Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Roodvoets AGH, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RGH, Blomqvist LK, Fokstuen T, Ten Tije AJ, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes A, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP; RAPIDO collaborative investigators. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):29-42. Epub 2020 Dec 7. link to original article PubMed
Retrieved from "https://hemonc.org/w/index.php?title=Complex_multipart_regimens&oldid=67040"