Difference between revisions of "Colon cancer, RAS wild-type"

From HemOnc.org - A Hematology Oncology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" !Study !Evidence |-" to "{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" !style="width: 50%"|Study !style="width: 50%"|Evidence |-")
m (Text replacement - "{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" !Study !Evidence !Comparator !Efficacy |-" to "{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" !style="width: 25%"|Study !style="width: 25%"|Evidence !style="width: 25%"|Comparator !style="width: 25%"|Efficacy |-")
Line 36: Line 36:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:7abe3e|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:7abe3e|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1148329 Alberts et al. 2012 (N0147)]
 
|[http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1148329 Alberts et al. 2012 (N0147)]
Line 72: Line 72:
 
===Variant #1, weekly cetuximab {{#subobject:8f47f9|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, weekly cetuximab {{#subobject:8f47f9|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8308 Ye et al. 2013]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8308 Ye et al. 2013]
Line 98: Line 98:
 
===Variant #2, bi-weekly cetuximab {{#subobject:49d215|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, bi-weekly cetuximab {{#subobject:49d215|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8308 Ye et al. 2013]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8308 Ye et al. 2013]
Line 130: Line 130:
 
===Variant #1, weekly cetuximab {{#subobject:dcf5ee|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #1, weekly cetuximab {{#subobject:dcf5ee|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8308 Ye et al. 2013]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8308 Ye et al. 2013]
Line 156: Line 156:
 
===Variant #2, bi-weekly cetuximab {{#subobject:e190fa|Variant=1}}===
 
===Variant #2, bi-weekly cetuximab {{#subobject:e190fa|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8308 Ye et al. 2013]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8308 Ye et al. 2013]
Line 193: Line 193:
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0805019 Van Cutsem et al. 2009 (CRYSTAL)]
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0805019 Van Cutsem et al. 2009 (CRYSTAL)]
Line 237: Line 237:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:9ec84d|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:9ec84d|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8397 Bokemeyer et al. 2008 (OPUS)]
 
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8397 Bokemeyer et al. 2008 (OPUS)]
Line 271: Line 271:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:d862a3|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:d862a3|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/28/31/4697.long Douillard et al. 2010 (PRIME)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/28/31/4697.long Douillard et al. 2010 (PRIME)]
Line 305: Line 305:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:ebf6e5|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:ebf6e5|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/28/31/4706.long Peeters et al. 2010]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/28/31/4706.long Peeters et al. 2010]
Line 335: Line 335:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:b7315f|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:b7315f|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/26/14/2311.long Sobrero et al. 2008 (EPIC)]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/26/14/2311.long Sobrero et al. 2008 (EPIC)]
Line 378: Line 378:
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa033025 Cunningham et al. 2004 (BOND)]
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa033025 Cunningham et al. 2004 (BOND)]
Line 458: Line 458:
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa033025 Cunningham et al. 2004 (BOND)]
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa033025 Cunningham et al. 2004 (BOND)]
Line 488: Line 488:
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa033025 Cunningham et al. 2004 (BOND)]
 
|[http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa033025 Cunningham et al. 2004 (BOND)]
Line 563: Line 563:
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:fa978e|Variant=1}}===
 
===Regimen {{#subobject:fa978e|Variant=1}}===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"  
!Study
+
!style="width: 25%"|Study
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]]
!Comparator
+
!style="width: 25%"|Comparator
![[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
+
!style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/13/1658.long Van Cutsem et al. 2007]
 
|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/13/1658.long Van Cutsem et al. 2007]

Revision as of 03:25, 19 August 2018

Section editor
Nkv.jpg
Neeta K. Venepalli, MD, MBA
Chicago, IL

Note: the page has adjuvant and perioperative regimens specific to KRAS wild-type colon cancer as well as systemic regimens for the more general category of KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer.

2 regimens on this page
2 variants on this page


Guidelines

ESMO

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum

NCCN

Adjuvant therapy

mFOLFOX6 & Cetuximab

back to top

mFOLFOX6 & Cetuximab: modified FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, OXaliplatin, Cetuximab

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Alberts et al. 2012 (N0147) Phase III (E) mFOLFOX6 Might have inferior DFS

Some guidelines do not recommend using cetuximab as adjuvant therapy outside of a clinical trial.

Preceding treatment

  • Surgery, within 10 weeks

Chemotherapy

  • Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus once on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 46 to 48 hours on days 1 to 2 (total dose per cycle: 2800 mg/m2)
  • Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1
  • Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 85 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows:
    • Cycle 1: 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once on day 8
    • Cycles 2 to 12: 250 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once per day on days 1 & 8

14-day cycle for 12 cycles

References

  1. N0147: Alberts SR, Sargent DJ, Nair S, Mahoney MR, Mooney M, Thibodeau SN, Smyrk TC, Sinicrope FA, Chan E, Gill S, Kahlenberg MS, Shields AF, Quesenberry JT, Webb TA, Farr GH Jr, Pockaj BA, Grothey A, Goldberg RM. Effect of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab on survival among patients with resected stage III colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1383-93. link to original article contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed

Perioperative therapy for oligometastatic disease

FOLFIRI & Cetuximab

back to top

FOLFIRI & Cetuximab: FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, IRInotecan, Cetuximab

Variant #1, weekly cetuximab

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ye et al. 2013 Phase III (E) FOLFIRI Seems to have superior OS

Note: this trial was only open to KRAS wild-type patients with synchronous liver-confined unresectable metastases.

Chemotherapy

  • Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus once on day 1, then 2400 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion over 46 hours on days 1 to 2 (total dose per cycle: 2800 mg/m2)
  • Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 400 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
  • Irinotecan (Camptosar) 180 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows, given first:
    • Cycle 1: 400 mg/m2 IV once on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV once on day 8
    • Subsequent cycles: 250 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 & 8

14-day cycles

Treatment continued until lesions deemed resectable or progression or toxicity, or maximum of 12 cycles.

Variant #2, bi-weekly cetuximab

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ye et al. 2013 Phase III (E) FOLFIRI Seems to have superior OS

Note: this trial was only open to KRAS wild-type patients with synchronous liver-confined unresectable metastases.

Chemotherapy

14-day cycles

Treatment continued until lesions deemed resectable or progression or toxicity, or maximum of 12 cycles.

References

  1. Ye LC, Liu TS, Ren L, Wei Y, Zhu DX, Zai SY, Ye QH, Yu Y, Xu B, Qin XY, Xu J. Randomized controlled trial of cetuximab plus chemotherapy for patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun 1;31(16):1931-8. Epub 2013 Apr 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

mFOLFOX6 & Cetuximab

back to top

mFOLFOX6 & Cetuximab: modified FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, OXaliplatin, Cetuximab

Variant #1, weekly cetuximab

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ye et al. 2013 Phase III (E) mFOLFOX6 Seems to have superior OS

Note: this trial was only open to KRAS wild-type patients with synchronous liver-confined unresectable metastases.

Chemotherapy

  • Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus once on day 1, then 2400 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion over 46 hours on days 1 to 2 (total dose per cycle: 2800 mg/m2)
  • Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 400 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
  • Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 85 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows, given first:
    • Cycle 1: 400 mg/m2 IV once on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV once on day 8
    • Subsequent cycles: 250 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 & 8

14-day cycles

Treatment continued until lesions deemed resectable or progression or toxicity, or maximum of 12 cycles.

Variant #2, bi-weekly cetuximab

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Ye et al. 2013 Phase III (E) mFOLFOX6 Seems to have superior OS

Note: this trial was only open to KRAS wild-type patients with synchronous liver-confined unresectable metastases.

Chemotherapy

14-day cycles

Treatment continued until lesions deemed resectable or progression or toxicity, or maximum of 12 cycles.

References

  1. Ye LC, Liu TS, Ren L, Wei Y, Zhu DX, Zai SY, Ye QH, Yu Y, Xu B, Qin XY, Xu J. Randomized controlled trial of cetuximab plus chemotherapy for patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun 1;31(16):1931-8. Epub 2013 Apr 8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Advanced or metastatic disease, first-line

FOLFIRI & Cetuximab

back to top

FOLFIRI & Cetuximab: FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, IRInotecan, Cetuximab

Regimen

FDA-recommended dose
Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Van Cutsem et al. 2009 (CRYSTAL) Phase III (E) FOLFIRI Superior OS (*)
Heinemann et al. 2014 (FIRE-3) Phase III (E) FOLFIRI & Bevacizumab Seems not superior

Reported efficacy for CRYSTAL is based on the 2012 pooled update and is only for KRAS wild-type tumors.

Chemotherapy

  • Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1, started during irinotecan infusion
  • Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus once on day 1, then 2400 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion over 46 hours on days 1 to 2, given last (total dose per cycle: 2800 mg/m2)
  • Irinotecan (Camptosar) 180 mg/m2 IV over 30 to 90 minutes once on day 1, given 1 hour after completion of cetuximab
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows, given first and completed at least 1 hour before FOLFIRI begins:
    • Cycle 1: 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes on day 8
    • Cycle 2 onwards: 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 1 & 8

14-day cycles

References

  1. CRYSTAL: Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, D'Haens G, Pintér T, Lim R, Bodoky G, Roh JK, Folprecht G, Ruff P, Stroh C, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Nippgen J, Rougier P. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1408-17. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Update: Abstract: E. Van Cutsem, I. Lang, G. Folprecht, M. Nowacki, C. Barone, I. Shchepotin, J. Maurel, D. Cunningham, I. Celik, C. Kohne. Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI: Final data from the CRYSTAL study on the association of KRAS and BRAF biomarker status with treatment outcome. 2010 ASCO Annual Meeting abstract 3570. link to abstract
    2. Update: Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Láng I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, Shchepotin I, Maurel J, Cunningham D, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Zubel A, Celik I, Rougier P, Ciardiello F. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2011-9. Epub 2011 Apr 18. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    3. Update: Bokemeyer C, Cutsem EV, Rougier P, Ciardiello F, Heeger S, Schlichting M, Celik I, Köhne CH. Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(10):1466-75. Epub 2012 Mar 23. link to original article PubMed
  2. FIRE-3: Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran SE, Heintges T, Lerchenmüller C, Kahl C, Seipelt G, Kullmann F, Stauch M, Scheithauer W, Hielscher J, Scholz M, Müller S, Link H, Niederle N, Rost A, Höffkes HG, Moehler M, Lindig RU, Modest DP, Rossius L, Kirchner T, Jung A, Stintzing S. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1065-75. Epub 2014 Jul 31. link to original article PubMed

FOLFOX4 & Cetuximab

back to top

FOLFOX4 & Cetuximab: FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, OXaliplatin, Cetuximab

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Bokemeyer et al. 2008 (OPUS) Phase III (E) FOLFOX4 Superior OS (*)

Reported efficacy is based on the 2012 pooled update and is only for KRAS wild-type tumors.

Chemotherapy

  • Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, then 600 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 22 hours once per day on days 1 & 2 (total dose per cycle: 2000 mg/m2)
  • Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 200 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once per day on days 1 & 2, before 5-FU
  • Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 85 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1, concurrent with leucovorin
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows:
    • Cycle 1 day 1: 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once, given first
    • Thereafter: 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per week, given first

14-day cycles

References

  1. OPUS: Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, Hartmann JT, Aparicio J, de Braud F, Donea S, Ludwig H, Schuch G, Stroh C, Loos AH, Zubel A, Koralewski P. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):663-71. Epub 2008 Dec 29. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Pooled Update: Bokemeyer C, Cutsem EV, Rougier P, Ciardiello F, Heeger S, Schlichting M, Celik I, Köhne CH. Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(10):1466-75. Epub 2012 Mar 23. link to original article PubMed

FOLFOX4 & Panitumumab

back to top

FOLFOX4 & Panitumumab: FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, OXaliplatin, Panitumumab

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Douillard et al. 2010 (PRIME) Phase III (E) FOLFOX4 See note

Note: in KRAS wild-type patients, this regimen seems to have superior PFS. Conversely, in KRAS mutants, this regimen seems to have inferior PFS.

Chemotherapy

  • Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus once on day 1, then 600 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 22 hours; both bolus and continuous infusion given on days 1 & 2
  • Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 200 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once per day on days 1 & 2
  • Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 85 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1
  • Panitumumab (Vectibix) 6 mg/kg IV once on day 1, given first
    • Infusion times are 1 hour for cycle 1, then if tolerated, 30 minutes for cycle 2 and later

References

  1. PRIME: Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, Humblet Y, Bodoky G, Cunningham D, Jassem J, Rivera F, Kocákova I, Ruff P, Błasińska-Morawiec M, Šmakal M, Canon JL, Rother M, Oliner KS, Wolf M, Gansert J. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4697-705. Epub 2010 Oct 4. link to original article PubMed
    1. Biomarker analysis: Douillard JY, Oliner KS, Siena S, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, Humblet Y, Bodoky G, Cunningham D, Jassem J, Rivera F, Kocákova I, Ruff P, Błasińska-Morawiec M, Šmakal M, Canon JL, Rother M, Williams R, Rong A, Wiezorek J, Sidhu R, Patterson SD. Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 12;369(11):1023-34. link to original article PubMed

Advanced or metastatic disease, second-line

FOLFIRI & Panitumumab

back to top

FOLFIRI & Panitumumab: FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, IRInotecan, Panitumumab

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Peeters et al. 2010 Phase III (E) FOLFIRI Superior PFS

Note: efficacy is for wild-type KRAS, only.

Chemotherapy

14-day cycles

References

  1. Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, Sobrero AF, Ducreux M, Hotko Y, André T, Chan E, Lordick F, Punt CJ, Strickland AH, Wilson G, Ciuleanu TE, Roman L, Van Cutsem E, Tzekova V, Collins S, Oliner KS, Rong A, Gansert J. Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4706-13. Epub 2010 Oct 4. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Irinotecan & Cetuximab

back to top

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Sobrero et al. 2008 (EPIC) Phase III (E) Irinotecan Seems not superior

Chemotherapy

  • Irinotecan (Camptosar) 350 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes once on day 1
    • If aged 70 years old or more, ECOG performance status 2 or more, or prior pelvic radiation: 300 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes once on day 1
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows:
    • Cycle 1: 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 8 & 15
    • Subsequent cycles: 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 1, 8, 15

Supportive medications

21-day cycles

References

  1. EPIC: Sobrero AF, Maurel J, Fehrenbacher L, Scheithauer W, Abubakr YA, Lutz MP, Vega-Villegas ME, Eng C, Steinhauer EU, Prausova J, Lenz HJ, Borg C, Middleton G, Kröning H, Luppi G, Kisker O, Zubel A, Langer C, Kopit J, Burris HA 3rd. EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 10;26(14):2311-9. Epub 2008 Apr 7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed

Advanced or metastatic disease, subsequent lines of therapy

Cetuximab monotherapy

back to top

Example orders

Variant #1, weekly

FDA-recommended dose
Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Cunningham et al. 2004 (BOND) Phase III (C) Cetuximab & Irinotecan Inferior TTP
Lenz et al. 2006 (SALVAGE) Phase II
Jonker et al. 2007 (NCIC CTG CO.17) Phase III (E) Best supportive care Superior OS
Siu et al. 2013 (NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.20) Phase III (C) Brivanib & Cetuximab Seems not superior
Price et al. 2014 (ASPECCT) Phase III (C) Panitumumab Non-inferior OS

Chemotherapy

  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1 of cycle 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per week

Supportive medications

Given until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

Variant #2, bi-weekly

Study Evidence
Tabernero et al. 2009 Phase I

Note: no primary reference could be found for this exact dosing in monotherapy; in the phase I trial it is described as "the most convenient and feasible dose".

Chemotherapy

  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) 500 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1
    • If tolerated, subsequent doses can be given over 1 hour

Supportive medications

14-day cycles

References

  1. BOND: Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, Santoro A, Bets D, Mueser M, Harstrick A, Verslype C, Chau I, Van Cutsem E. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):337-45. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. SALVAGE: Lenz HJ, Van Cutsem E, Khambata-Ford S, Mayer RJ, Gold P, Stella P, Mirtsching B, Cohn AL, Pippas AW, Azarnia N, Tsuchihashi Z, Mauro DJ, Rowinsky EK. Multicenter phase II and translational study of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal carcinoma refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 20;24(30):4914-21. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  3. NCIC CTG CO.17: Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, Au HJ, Berry SR, Krahn M, Price T, Simes RJ, Tebbutt NC, van Hazel G, Wierzbicki R, Langer C, Moore MJ. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):2040-8. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
    1. Subgroup analysis: Asmis TR, Powell E, Karapetis CS, Jonker DJ, Tu D, Jeffery M, Pavlakis N, Gibbs P, Zhu L, Dueck DA, Whittom R, Langer C, O'Callaghan CJ. Comorbidity, age and overall survival in cetuximab-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC)--results from NCIC CTG CO.17: a phase III trial of cetuximab versus best supportive care. Ann Oncol. 2011 Jan;22(1):118-26. Epub 2010 Jul 5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  4. Phase I: Tabernero J, Ciardiello F, Rivera F, Rodriguez-Braun E, Ramos FJ, Martinelli E, Vega-Villegas ME, Roselló S, Liebscher S, Kisker O, Macarulla T, Baselga J, Cervantes A. Cetuximab administered once every second week to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a two-part pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic phase I dose-escalation study. Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1537-45. Epub 2009 Nov 25. link to original article PubMed
  5. NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.20: Siu LL, Shapiro JD, Jonker DJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Simes J, Couture F, Moore MJ, Price TJ, Siddiqui J, Nott LM, Charpentier D, Liauw W, Sawyer MB, Jefford M, Magoski NM, Haydon A, Walters I, Ringash J, Tu D, O'Callaghan CJ. Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled study of cetuximab plus brivanib alaninate versus cetuximab plus placebo in patients with metastatic, chemotherapy-refractory, wild-type K-RAS colorectal carcinoma: the NCIC Clinical Trials Group and AGITG CO.20 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 1;31(19):2477-84. Epub 2013 May 20. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  6. ASPECCT: Price TJ, Peeters M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Zhang K, Murugappan S, Sidhu R. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):569-79. Epub 2014 Apr 14. link to original article PubMed

Irinotecan & Cetuximab

back to top

Variant #1, q3wk irinotecan

FDA-recommended dose
Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Cunningham et al. 2004 (BOND) Phase III (E) Cetuximab Superior TTP

Note that the FDA-recommended dosing is for the cetuximab component; no comment is made about irinotecan dosing.

Chemotherapy

  • Irinotecan (Camptosar) 350 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes once on day 1
    • If aged 70 years old or more, ECOG performance status 2 or more, or prior pelvic radiation: 300 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes once on day 1
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows:
    • Cycle 1: 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 8 & 15
    • Subsequent cycles: 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 1, 8, 15

Supportive medications

21-day cycles

Variant #2, irinotecan 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off

FDA-recommended dose
Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Cunningham et al. 2004 (BOND) Phase III (E) Cetuximab Superior TTP

Note that the FDA-recommended dosing is for the cetuximab component; no comment is made about irinotecan dosing.

Chemotherapy

  • Irinotecan (Camptosar) 125 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes once per day on days 1, 8, 15, 22
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows:
    • Cycle 1: 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36
    • Subsequent cycles: 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36

Supportive medications

42-day cycles

Variant #3, irinotecan 2 weeks on, 1 week off

FDA-recommended dose

Note: In contrast to BOND, some guidelines list irinotecan as being given on days 1 & 8 of a 21-day cycle. No primary reference could be found for this. Note also that the FDA-recommended dosing is for the cetuximab component; no comment is made about irinotecan dosing.

Chemotherapy

  • Irinotecan (Camptosar) 125 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes once per day on days 1 & 8
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows:
    • Cycle 1: 400 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours once on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 8 & 15
    • Subsequent cycles: 250 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes once per day on days 1, 8, 15

Supportive medications

21-day cycles

Variant #4, escalated dose cetuximab

Study Evidence
Martín-Martorell et al. 2008 Phase II

Chemotherapy

Supportive medications

14-day cycles

References

  1. BOND: Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, Santoro A, Bets D, Mueser M, Harstrick A, Verslype C, Chau I, Van Cutsem E. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):337-45. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. Martín-Martorell P, Roselló S, Rodríguez-Braun E, Chirivella I, Bosch A, Cervantes A. Biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer patients progressing after at least one previous line of chemotherapy: results of a phase II single institution trial. Br J Cancer. 2008 Aug 5;99(3):455-8. link to original article contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed
  3. Dose escalation study: Van Cutsem E, Tejpar S, Vanbeckevoort D, Peeters M, Humblet Y, Gelderblom H, Vermorken JB, Viret F, Glimelius B, Gallerani E, Hendlisz A, Cats A, Moehler M, Sagaert X, Vlassak S, Schlichting M, Ciardiello F. Intrapatient cetuximab dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer according to the grade of early skin reactions: the randomized EVEREST study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 10;30(23):2861-8. Epub 2012 Jul 2.link to original article PubMed

Panitumumab monotherapy

back to top

Example orders

Regimen

Study Evidence Comparator Efficacy
Van Cutsem et al. 2007 Phase III (E) Best supportive care Superior PFS
Price et al. 2014 (ASPECCT) Phase III (E) Cetuximab Non-inferior OS
Kim et al. 2016 (20100007) Phase III (E) Best supportive care Superior OS

Chemotherapy

14-day cycles

References

  1. Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, Canon JL, Van Laethem JL, Maurel J, Richardson G, Wolf M, Amado RG. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1658-64. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
  2. ASPECCT: Price TJ, Peeters M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Zhang K, Murugappan S, Sidhu R. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):569-79. Epub 2014 Apr 14. link to original article PubMed
  3. 20100007: Kim TW, Elme A, Kusic Z, Park JO, Udrea AA, Kim SY, Ahn JB, Valencia RV, Krishnan S, Bilic A, Manojlovic N, Dong J, Guan X, Lofton-Day C, Jung AS, Vrdoljak E. A phase 3 trial evaluating panitumumab plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS or RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016 Nov 8;115(10):1206-1214. Epub 2016 Oct 13. link to original article link to PMC article PubMed