Difference between revisions of "Malignant pleural mesothelioma - null regimens"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warner-admin (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%" to "{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 100%") |
Warner-admin (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/26/10/1698.long" to "https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.9887") |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
!style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Comparative_efficacy|Comparative Efficacy]] | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Comparative_efficacy|Comparative Efficacy]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |[ | + | |[https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.9887 Jassem et al. 2008] |
|2001-2004 | |2001-2004 | ||
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
− | # Jassem J, Ramlau R, Santoro A, Schuette W, Chemaissani A, Hong S, Blatter J, Adachi S, Hanauske A, Manegold C. Phase III trial of pemetrexed plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care in previously treated patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1698-704. [ | + | # Jassem J, Ramlau R, Santoro A, Schuette W, Chemaissani A, Hong S, Blatter J, Adachi S, Hanauske A, Manegold C. Phase III trial of pemetrexed plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care in previously treated patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1698-704. [https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.9887 link to original article] '''contains verified protocol''' [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18375898 PubMed] |
# '''DETERMINE:''' Maio M, Scherpereel A, Calabrò L, Aerts J, Cedres Perez S, Bearz A, Nackaerts K, Fennell DA, Kowalski D, Tsao AS, Taylor P, Grosso F, Antonia SJ, Nowak AK, Taboada M, Puglisi M, Stockman PK, Kindler HL. Tremelimumab as second-line or third-line treatment in relapsed malignant mesothelioma (DETERMINE): a multicentre, international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1261-1273. Epub 2017 Jul 17. [https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(17)30446-1/fulltext link to original article] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28729154 PubMed] | # '''DETERMINE:''' Maio M, Scherpereel A, Calabrò L, Aerts J, Cedres Perez S, Bearz A, Nackaerts K, Fennell DA, Kowalski D, Tsao AS, Taylor P, Grosso F, Antonia SJ, Nowak AK, Taboada M, Puglisi M, Stockman PK, Kindler HL. Tremelimumab as second-line or third-line treatment in relapsed malignant mesothelioma (DETERMINE): a multicentre, international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1261-1273. Epub 2017 Jul 17. [https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(17)30446-1/fulltext link to original article] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28729154 PubMed] | ||
Revision as of 00:11, 1 April 2021
The purpose of this page is to provide references to "null therapy" such as placebo and observation. While not clinically relevant, these references provide further insight into the historical development of the treatment landscape. See the main mesothelioma page for current regimens.
Advanced or metastatic disease, first-line therapy
Best supportive care
back to top |
Regimen
Study | Years of enrollment | Evidence | Comparator | Comparative Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|---|
Muers et al. 2008 (MS01) | 2001-2006 | Phase III (C) | 1. MVP | Did not meet primary endpoint of OS |
2. Vinorelbine | Might have inferior OS |
No antineoplastic treatment; used as a comparator arm and here for reference purposes only.
References
- MS01: Muers MF, Stephens RJ, Fisher P, Darlison L, Higgs CM, Lowry E, Nicholson AG, O'Brien M, Peake M, Rudd R, Snee M, Steele J, Girling DJ, Nankivell M, Pugh C, Parmar MK; MS01 Trial Management Group. Active symptom control with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MS01): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2008 May 17;371(9625):1685-94. link to original article contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed
Maintenance after first line therapy
Best supportive care
back to top |
Regimen
Study | Years of enrollment | Evidence | Comparator | Comparative Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buikhuisen et al. 2013 (NVALT 5) | 2004-2009 | Phase III (C) | Thalidomide | Did not meet primary endpoint of TTP |
No antineoplastic treatment after first-line therapy.
Preceding treatment
References
- NVALT 5: Buikhuisen WA, Burgers JA, Vincent AD, Korse CM, van Klaveren RJ, Schramel FM, Pavlakis N, Nowak AK, Custers FL, Schouwink JH, Gans SJ, Groen HJ, Strankinga WF, Baas P. Thalidomide versus active supportive care for maintenance in patients with malignant mesothelioma after first-line chemotherapy (NVALT 5): an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):543-51. Epub 2013 Apr 12. link to original article PubMed
Advanced or metastatic disease, subsequent lines of therapy
Best supportive care
back to top |
Regimen
Study | Years of enrollment | Evidence | Comparator | Comparative Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jassem et al. 2008 | 2001-2004 | Phase III (C) | Pemetrexed | Seems to have inferior PFS |
Maio et al. 2017 (DETERMINE) | 2013-2014 | Randomized Phase IIb (C) | Tremelimumab | Did not meet primary endpoint of OS |
No antineoplastic treatment.
References
- Jassem J, Ramlau R, Santoro A, Schuette W, Chemaissani A, Hong S, Blatter J, Adachi S, Hanauske A, Manegold C. Phase III trial of pemetrexed plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care in previously treated patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1698-704. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- DETERMINE: Maio M, Scherpereel A, Calabrò L, Aerts J, Cedres Perez S, Bearz A, Nackaerts K, Fennell DA, Kowalski D, Tsao AS, Taylor P, Grosso F, Antonia SJ, Nowak AK, Taboada M, Puglisi M, Stockman PK, Kindler HL. Tremelimumab as second-line or third-line treatment in relapsed malignant mesothelioma (DETERMINE): a multicentre, international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1261-1273. Epub 2017 Jul 17. link to original article PubMed
Placebo
back to top |
Regimen
Study | Years of enrollment | Evidence | Comparator | Comparative Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|---|
Krug et al. 2015 (VANTAGE-014) | 2005-2011 | Phase III (C) | Vorinostat | Did not meet primary endpoint of OS |
No active antineoplastic treatment.
References
- VANTAGE-014: Krug LM, Kindler HL, Calvert H, Manegold C, Tsao AS, Fennell D, Öhman R, Plummer R, Eberhardt WE, Fukuoka K, Gaafar RM, Lafitte JJ, Hillerdal G, Chu Q, Buikhuisen WA, Lubiniecki GM, Sun X, Smith M, Baas P. Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):447-56. Epub 2015 Mar 20. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2015 May;16(5):e199. link to original article PubMed