Difference between revisions of "Low-grade serous ovarian cancer"

From HemOnc.org - A Hematology Oncology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 18: Line 18:
 
|[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7655017/ Monk et al. 2020 (MILO)]
 
|[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7655017/ Monk et al. 2020 (MILO)]
 
|2013-2016
 
|2013-2016
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase 3 (C)
|Binimetinib
+
|[[#Binimetinib_monotherapy_99|Binimetinib]]
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS<br>Median PFS: 10.6 vs 9.1 mo<br>(HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.27)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 45: Line 45:
 
|[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7655017/ Monk et al. 2020 (MILO)]
 
|[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7655017/ Monk et al. 2020 (MILO)]
 
|2013-2016
 
|2013-2016
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase 3 (C)
|Binimetinib
+
|[[#Binimetinib_monotherapy_99|Binimetinib]]
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS<br>Median PFS: 10.6 vs 9.1 mo<br>(HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.27)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 71: Line 71:
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627419/ Farley et al. 2013 (GOG-0239)]
 
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627419/ Farley et al. 2013 (GOG-0239)]
 
|2007-2009
 
|2007-2009
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase II
+
| style="background-color:#91cf61" |Phase 2
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 96: Line 96:
 
|[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7655017/ Monk et al. 2020 (MILO)]
 
|[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7655017/ Monk et al. 2020 (MILO)]
 
|2013-2016
 
|2013-2016
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C)
+
|style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase 3 (C)
|Binimetinib
+
|[[#Binimetinib_monotherapy_99|Binimetinib]]
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS
+
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS<br>Median PFS: 10.6 vs 9.1 mo<br>(HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.27)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 01:12, 8 February 2022

Section editor transclusions Note: this page has regimens which are specific to low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC). Please see the main ovarian cancer page for other chemotherapy regimens.


Relapsed or recurrent disease

Doxorubicin pegylated liposomal monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Years of enrollment Evidence Comparator Comparative Efficacy
Monk et al. 2020 (MILO) 2013-2016 Phase 3 (C) Binimetinib Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS
Median PFS: 10.6 vs 9.1 mo
(HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.27)

Chemotherapy

28-day cycles

References

  1. MILO: Monk BJ, Grisham RN, Banerjee S, Kalbacher E, Mirza MR, Romero I, Vuylsteke P, Coleman RL, Hilpert F, Oza AM, Westermann A, Oehler MK, Pignata S, Aghajanian C, Colombo N, Drill E, Cibula D, Moore KN, Christy-Bittel J, Del Campo JM, Berger R, Marth C, Sehouli J, O'Malley DM, Churruca C, Boyd AP, Kristensen G, Clamp A, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I. MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 10;38(32):3753-3762. Epub 2020 Aug 21. link to original article contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed NCT01849874

Paclitaxel monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Years of enrollment Evidence Comparator Comparative Efficacy
Monk et al. 2020 (MILO) 2013-2016 Phase 3 (C) Binimetinib Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS
Median PFS: 10.6 vs 9.1 mo
(HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.27)

Note: this trial studied patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC).

Chemotherapy

28-day cycles

References

  1. MILO: Monk BJ, Grisham RN, Banerjee S, Kalbacher E, Mirza MR, Romero I, Vuylsteke P, Coleman RL, Hilpert F, Oza AM, Westermann A, Oehler MK, Pignata S, Aghajanian C, Colombo N, Drill E, Cibula D, Moore KN, Christy-Bittel J, Del Campo JM, Berger R, Marth C, Sehouli J, O'Malley DM, Churruca C, Boyd AP, Kristensen G, Clamp A, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I. MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 10;38(32):3753-3762. Epub 2020 Aug 21. link to original article contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed NCT01849874

Selumetinib monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Years of enrollment Evidence
Farley et al. 2013 (GOG-0239) 2007-2009 Phase 2

Targeted therapy

28-day cycles

References

  1. GOG-0239: Farley J, Brady WE, Vathipadiekal V, Lankes HA, Coleman R, Morgan MA, Mannel R, Yamada SD, Mutch D, Rodgers WH, Birrer M, Gershenson DM. Selumetinib in women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):134-40. Epub 2012 Dec 21. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed NCT00551070

Topotecan monotherapy

back to top

Regimen

Study Years of enrollment Evidence Comparator Comparative Efficacy
Monk et al. 2020 (MILO) 2013-2016 Phase 3 (C) Binimetinib Did not meet primary endpoint of PFS
Median PFS: 10.6 vs 9.1 mo
(HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.27)

Chemotherapy

21-day cycles

References

  1. MILO: Monk BJ, Grisham RN, Banerjee S, Kalbacher E, Mirza MR, Romero I, Vuylsteke P, Coleman RL, Hilpert F, Oza AM, Westermann A, Oehler MK, Pignata S, Aghajanian C, Colombo N, Drill E, Cibula D, Moore KN, Christy-Bittel J, Del Campo JM, Berger R, Marth C, Sehouli J, O'Malley DM, Churruca C, Boyd AP, Kristensen G, Clamp A, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I. MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 10;38(32):3753-3762. Epub 2020 Aug 21. link to original article contains verified protocol link to PMC article PubMed NCT01849874